The Evolutionary Roots of Familial Altruism: Paternity Uncertainty Shapes Patterns of Kindness.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Evolutionary Psychology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1177/14747049251357493
Radim Kuba, Jaroslav Flegr
{"title":"The Evolutionary Roots of Familial Altruism: Paternity Uncertainty Shapes Patterns of Kindness.","authors":"Radim Kuba, Jaroslav Flegr","doi":"10.1177/14747049251357493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated how paternity uncertainty (PU) shapes perceptions of familial kindness. We predicted that relatives with lower PU would be rated as kinder than those with higher PU. A total of 9,128 participants rated the kindness of specific relatives in their families. Main analyses focused on parents and maternal/paternal grandparents, who differ in their typical levels of PU. Siblings were included for broader within-family comparisons, while step-relatives, all having identical (maximal) PU, served as negative controls. Controlling for sex, age, and random effects of raters and targets, results supported PU predictions: PU showed a negative correlation with rated kindness (<i>β</i> = -0.148, <i>t</i><sub>(31,910)</sub> = -6.23, <i>p</i> < 0.001, with the full model (including PU) significantly outperforming a reduced model (<i>χ</i>²<sub>(2)</sub> = 42.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Post-hoc tests revealed significant differences between adjacent PU levels (0 vs. 1: <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.15; 1 vs. 2: <i>p</i> = 0.0002, <i>d</i> = 0.08). Mothers and maternal grandmothers (no PU) were rated the kindest, while the paternal grandfather (two PU) was rated lowest. Daughters consistently rated their biological parents higher than sons, possibly reflecting lower PU through female offspring. Maternal grandfathers were rated kinder than fathers, despite identical PU, perhaps due to redirected investment by non-reproducing elders. Furthermore, mothers were rated kinder than maternal grandmothers, possibly due to \"insider knowledge\" of their children's paternity. Step-relatives showed minimal variation, suggesting that observed differences among biological kin reflect genetic relatedness and PU, rather than non-genetic factors. Overall, our findings support kin selection theory and suggest that paternity uncertainty subtly yet systematically shapes perceptions of familial kindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47499,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Psychology","volume":"23 3","pages":"14747049251357493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049251357493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated how paternity uncertainty (PU) shapes perceptions of familial kindness. We predicted that relatives with lower PU would be rated as kinder than those with higher PU. A total of 9,128 participants rated the kindness of specific relatives in their families. Main analyses focused on parents and maternal/paternal grandparents, who differ in their typical levels of PU. Siblings were included for broader within-family comparisons, while step-relatives, all having identical (maximal) PU, served as negative controls. Controlling for sex, age, and random effects of raters and targets, results supported PU predictions: PU showed a negative correlation with rated kindness (β = -0.148, t(31,910) = -6.23, p < 0.001, with the full model (including PU) significantly outperforming a reduced model (χ²(2) = 42.84, p < 0.001). Post-hoc tests revealed significant differences between adjacent PU levels (0 vs. 1: p < 0.001, d = 0.15; 1 vs. 2: p = 0.0002, d = 0.08). Mothers and maternal grandmothers (no PU) were rated the kindest, while the paternal grandfather (two PU) was rated lowest. Daughters consistently rated their biological parents higher than sons, possibly reflecting lower PU through female offspring. Maternal grandfathers were rated kinder than fathers, despite identical PU, perhaps due to redirected investment by non-reproducing elders. Furthermore, mothers were rated kinder than maternal grandmothers, possibly due to "insider knowledge" of their children's paternity. Step-relatives showed minimal variation, suggesting that observed differences among biological kin reflect genetic relatedness and PU, rather than non-genetic factors. Overall, our findings support kin selection theory and suggest that paternity uncertainty subtly yet systematically shapes perceptions of familial kindness.

家族利他主义的进化根源:父权的不确定性塑造了善良的模式。
我们调查了亲子关系的不确定性(PU)如何塑造对家庭友善的看法。我们预测PU较低的亲属会比PU较高的亲属更友善。共有9128名参与者对他们家庭中特定亲属的善良程度进行了评分。主要分析集中在父母和母亲/父亲祖父母身上,他们的典型PU水平不同。兄弟姐妹被包括在更广泛的家庭内部比较中,而继亲属,所有具有相同(最大)PU,作为阴性对照。控制性别、年龄、评分者和目标的随机效应,结果支持PU预测:PU与被评分的友善度呈负相关(β = -0.148, t(31,910) = -6.23, p χ²(2)= 42.84,pp d = 0.15;1 vs. 2: p = 0.0002, d = 0.08)。母亲和外祖母(没有PU)被评为最善良的,而祖父(两个PU)被评为最差的。女儿对亲生父母的评价始终高于儿子,这可能反映了女性后代的PU较低。尽管PU相同,但外祖父被认为比父亲更善良,这可能是由于没有生育能力的长辈进行了重新定向投资。此外,母亲被认为比外祖母更善良,这可能是由于对孩子父亲身份的“内幕知识”。继亲缘关系的差异很小,表明生物亲缘关系之间的差异反映了遗传亲缘关系和PU,而不是非遗传因素。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持亲缘选择理论,并表明父亲身份的不确定性微妙而系统地塑造了人们对家庭友善的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Psychology is an open-access peer-reviewed journal that aims to foster communication between experimental and theoretical work on the one hand and historical, conceptual and interdisciplinary writings across the whole range of the biological and human sciences on the other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信