Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Rural Iowa Hospitals: Content Analysis of Community Health Needs Assessments.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Khyathi Gadag, Ufuoma Ejughemre, Kristin Wilson, Whitney E Zahnd
{"title":"Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Rural Iowa Hospitals: Content Analysis of Community Health Needs Assessments.","authors":"Khyathi Gadag, Ufuoma Ejughemre, Kristin Wilson, Whitney E Zahnd","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With the shift to value-based care, social needs screening and referrals and other means of addressing the social determinants of health (SDOH) have become important ways for hospitals to address population health, which is particularly important for rural communities. Our objective was to evaluate how Iowa rural hospitals identified SDOHs in their community health needs assessment (CHNAs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted content analysis on the most recent CHNAs, and corresponding implementation plans of 53 rural Iowa hospitals, capturing broad social needs terms (eg, social screening, social risk) and specific SDOH terms (eg, housing, food insecurity), and hospital-community partnerships. We conducted stratified analysis by hospital-level characteristics like ownership (not-for-profit, non-federal government), type, and Accountable Care Organizations participation, and sociodemographic characteristics of each hospital's defined community area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequently identified SDOH were food insecurity (94.4%), transportation (92.6%), and housing insecurity (83.3%). Implementation plans primarily addressed food insecurity (53.7%), transportation (48.1%), and housing insecurity (35.2%). The most common hospital partnerships were with schools (68.5%), local organizations (53.7%), and faith-based organizations (31.5%). A lower percentage of Critical Access Hospitals and non-federal government hospitals addressed SDOH in their implementation plans compared to rural prospective payment system hospitals and non-profit hospitals, respectively. Hospitals serving counties with higher social needs showed higher assessment but lower implementation addressing these needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The disparities in screening and implementation efforts by hospital type, ownership, and payment models highlight the need for tailored policy interventions and infrastructure support to enhance social needs strategies, particularly in rural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"716-725"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: With the shift to value-based care, social needs screening and referrals and other means of addressing the social determinants of health (SDOH) have become important ways for hospitals to address population health, which is particularly important for rural communities. Our objective was to evaluate how Iowa rural hospitals identified SDOHs in their community health needs assessment (CHNAs).

Design: We conducted content analysis on the most recent CHNAs, and corresponding implementation plans of 53 rural Iowa hospitals, capturing broad social needs terms (eg, social screening, social risk) and specific SDOH terms (eg, housing, food insecurity), and hospital-community partnerships. We conducted stratified analysis by hospital-level characteristics like ownership (not-for-profit, non-federal government), type, and Accountable Care Organizations participation, and sociodemographic characteristics of each hospital's defined community area.

Results: The most frequently identified SDOH were food insecurity (94.4%), transportation (92.6%), and housing insecurity (83.3%). Implementation plans primarily addressed food insecurity (53.7%), transportation (48.1%), and housing insecurity (35.2%). The most common hospital partnerships were with schools (68.5%), local organizations (53.7%), and faith-based organizations (31.5%). A lower percentage of Critical Access Hospitals and non-federal government hospitals addressed SDOH in their implementation plans compared to rural prospective payment system hospitals and non-profit hospitals, respectively. Hospitals serving counties with higher social needs showed higher assessment but lower implementation addressing these needs.

Conclusion: The disparities in screening and implementation efforts by hospital type, ownership, and payment models highlight the need for tailored policy interventions and infrastructure support to enhance social needs strategies, particularly in rural contexts.

解决爱荷华州农村医院健康的社会决定因素:社区卫生需求评估的内容分析。
目标:随着向以价值为基础的保健的转变,社会需求、筛查和转诊以及其他处理健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的手段已成为医院处理人口健康问题的重要方式,这对农村社区尤其重要。我们的目的是评估爱荷华州农村医院如何在其社区卫生需求评估(CHNAs)中确定SDOHs。设计:我们对爱荷华州53家农村医院的最新中国医疗信息和相应的实施计划进行了内容分析,包括广泛的社会需求术语(如社会筛查、社会风险)和具体的SDOH术语(如住房、食品不安全),以及医院与社区的合作关系。我们根据医院层面的特征进行了分层分析,如所有权(非营利、非联邦政府)、类型和责任医疗组织的参与,以及每家医院所定义的社区区域的社会人口统计学特征。结果:最常见的SDOH是食品不安全(94.4%)、交通不安全(92.6%)和住房不安全(83.3%)。实施计划主要解决粮食不安全(53.7%)、交通(48.1%)和住房不安全(35.2%)问题。最常见的医院合作伙伴是学校(68.5%)、地方组织(53.7%)和宗教组织(31.5%)。与农村未来支付系统医院和非营利性医院相比,关键医院和非联邦政府医院在其实施计划中解决SDOH问题的比例较低。服务于社会需求较高的县的医院的评价较高,但满足这些需求的执行情况较低。结论:医院类型、所有权和支付模式在筛查和实施方面的差异突出表明,需要有针对性的政策干预和基础设施支持,以加强社会需求战略,特别是在农村地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信