Incorporating human factors methods into the configuration and implementation of an electronic health record system.

Q3 Medicine
Susan Biesbroek, Shaunna Milloy, Amanda Raven, Jessica Martel, Jared Dembicki, Katelyn Wiley, Andrea Opyr, Jason Laberge
{"title":"Incorporating human factors methods into the configuration and implementation of an electronic health record system.","authors":"Susan Biesbroek, Shaunna Milloy, Amanda Raven, Jessica Martel, Jared Dembicki, Katelyn Wiley, Andrea Opyr, Jason Laberge","doi":"10.1177/08404704251355226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems can help to improve patient safety by reducing common errors, but they can also introduce new safety risks associated with the technology itself. The application of Human Factor (HF) methods in an EHR implementation project is critical to identify usability issues early and optimize the build to ensure safety, efficiency, and alignment with clinical workflows. Despite the benefits, inclusion of HF evaluations can have time and resource costs which must be accounted for in the overall project plans and timelines. Based on our experiences with a large-scale EHR implementation project, this article outlines recommendations on how to incorporate HF evaluation methods into EHR design. Over the 7-year roll-out, the HF team had the opportunity to engage with over 400 clinical end users in 30 usability evaluations across the EHR project, which yielded over 2,000 recommendations for improvement to address usability issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251355226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251355226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems can help to improve patient safety by reducing common errors, but they can also introduce new safety risks associated with the technology itself. The application of Human Factor (HF) methods in an EHR implementation project is critical to identify usability issues early and optimize the build to ensure safety, efficiency, and alignment with clinical workflows. Despite the benefits, inclusion of HF evaluations can have time and resource costs which must be accounted for in the overall project plans and timelines. Based on our experiences with a large-scale EHR implementation project, this article outlines recommendations on how to incorporate HF evaluation methods into EHR design. Over the 7-year roll-out, the HF team had the opportunity to engage with over 400 clinical end users in 30 usability evaluations across the EHR project, which yielded over 2,000 recommendations for improvement to address usability issues.

将人为因素方法纳入电子健康记录系统的配置和实施。
电子健康记录(EHR)系统可以通过减少常见错误来帮助提高患者安全,但它们也可能引入与技术本身相关的新安全风险。在EHR实施项目中应用人为因素(HF)方法对于早期识别可用性问题和优化构建以确保安全性、效率和与临床工作流程的一致性至关重要。尽管有这些好处,但包括高频评价可能需要时间和资源成本,必须在整个项目计划和时间表中考虑到这一点。根据我们在大型电子病历实施项目中的经验,本文概述了如何将心力衰竭评估方法纳入电子病历设计的建议。在7年的推广过程中,HF团队有机会与400多名临床最终用户参与了整个EHR项目的30次可用性评估,得出了2000多条改进建议,以解决可用性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信