Mismatches between UK food supply and dietary guidelines: A dietary gap assessment.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Niamh M Kelly, Rebecca Wells, Rosalind Sharpe, Christian Reynolds
{"title":"Mismatches between UK food supply and dietary guidelines: A dietary gap assessment.","authors":"Niamh M Kelly, Rebecca Wells, Rosalind Sharpe, Christian Reynolds","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025100633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how aligned the UK food supply is with the Eatwell Guide and identify discrepancies which should be addressed to support the availability of healthy diets for the population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A dietary gap assessment was carried out on the 2022 UK food supply with FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (FAO-FBS) data, including domestic production, imports and exports, and excluding animal feed, seeds and non-food uses. Foods were grouped into potatoes and cereals, oils and spreads, dairy, protein, fruit and vegetables, and sugar. The percentage contribution of each food group to the food supply was compared to the Eatwell Guide. An overview of the food supply from 2010-2022 was also created. To triangulate the data, FAO-FBS data were compared with the 2022 data from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK, 2010-2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of fruit and vegetables, potatoes and cereals in the UK food supply were lower than the Eatwell Guide, while dairy and oil were higher. Only 7% of the food produced in the UK in 2022 was fruit and vegetables. This was the second smallest proportion, after oils and spreads (6%), and about half the amount of sugar beet produced (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the relationship between food supply and consumption is complex, taking a more coherent approach by integrating dietary recommendations with the food supply could help increase the availability of the recommended healthy diet. Going forwards, DEFRA should include dietary gap assessments in future Food Security Reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine how aligned the UK food supply is with the Eatwell Guide and identify discrepancies which should be addressed to support the availability of healthy diets for the population.

Design: A dietary gap assessment was carried out on the 2022 UK food supply with FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (FAO-FBS) data, including domestic production, imports and exports, and excluding animal feed, seeds and non-food uses. Foods were grouped into potatoes and cereals, oils and spreads, dairy, protein, fruit and vegetables, and sugar. The percentage contribution of each food group to the food supply was compared to the Eatwell Guide. An overview of the food supply from 2010-2022 was also created. To triangulate the data, FAO-FBS data were compared with the 2022 data from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

Setting: UK, 2010-2022.

Participants: N/A.

Results: The proportion of fruit and vegetables, potatoes and cereals in the UK food supply were lower than the Eatwell Guide, while dairy and oil were higher. Only 7% of the food produced in the UK in 2022 was fruit and vegetables. This was the second smallest proportion, after oils and spreads (6%), and about half the amount of sugar beet produced (13%).

Conclusion: Although the relationship between food supply and consumption is complex, taking a more coherent approach by integrating dietary recommendations with the food supply could help increase the availability of the recommended healthy diet. Going forwards, DEFRA should include dietary gap assessments in future Food Security Reports.

英国食品供应与膳食指南之间的不匹配:膳食差距评估。
目的:检查英国食品供应与Eatwell指南的一致性,并确定应解决的差异,以支持人口健康饮食的可用性。设计:利用粮农组织统计机构食品资产负债表(FAO-FBS)数据对2022年英国食品供应进行膳食缺口评估,包括国内生产、进口和出口,不包括动物饲料、种子和非食品用途。食物分为土豆和谷物、油和酱、乳制品、蛋白质、水果和蔬菜以及糖。每个食物组对食物供应的贡献百分比与Eatwell指南进行了比较。还创建了2010-2022年粮食供应概况。为了对数据进行三角测量,将粮农组织- fbs的数据与环境、食品和农村事务部(DEFRA) 2022年的数据进行了比较。背景:英国,2010-2022年。参与者:N / A。结果:英国食品供应中水果、蔬菜、土豆和谷物的比例低于Eatwell指南,而乳制品和油的比例较高。2022年,英国生产的食品中只有7%是水果和蔬菜。这是第二小的比例,仅次于油和酱(6%),大约是甜菜产量的一半(13%)。结论:虽然食物供应和消费之间的关系是复杂的,但采取更连贯的方法,将饮食建议与食物供应结合起来,可以帮助增加推荐的健康饮食的可用性。展望未来,DEFRA应该在未来的食品安全报告中纳入饮食差距评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信