Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of a New Digital Intervention ('FRAME') to Promote Resilience in Women Treated for Primary Breast Cancer.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Anna V Cartwright, Hannah Krzyzanowski, Rona Moss-Morris, Laura Smith, Yogini Sawjani, Camilla Böhme Kristensen, Nuvera Mukaty, Sam Norton, Jo Armes, Colette R Hirsch
{"title":"Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of a New Digital Intervention ('FRAME') to Promote Resilience in Women Treated for Primary Breast Cancer.","authors":"Anna V Cartwright, Hannah Krzyzanowski, Rona Moss-Morris, Laura Smith, Yogini Sawjani, Camilla Böhme Kristensen, Nuvera Mukaty, Sam Norton, Jo Armes, Colette R Hirsch","doi":"10.1002/pon.70217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the acceptability of a novel Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) intervention, 'FRAME', to promote resilience in women who have completed active treatment for primary breast cancer and determines the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-armed, participant-blind, parallel groups randomised controlled trial of CBM-I versus a time-matched control. Participants were recruited from community organisations and social media. Measures of acceptability, feasibility, change in interpretation bias and clinical outcomes (resilience, mood and quality of life) were assessed at baseline (T0), 1-month post-randomisation (T1, end of intervention), 2-month (T2) and 4-month post-randomisation (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven participants completed baseline assessment and were randomised to the FRAME CBM-I (n = 35) or control group (n = 32). Acceptability of CBM-I met pre-specified progression criteria, and 80% adhered to the CBM-I intervention. Between-group differences in interpretation bias at T1 demonstrated a moderate effect in favour of CBM-I on two measures of interpretation bias (SMD<sub>g</sub> = 0.66 and 0.73). Effect size estimates suggest moderate treatment effects on resilience (SMD<sub>g</sub> = 0.64) and small effects on mood, in favour of FRAME. No intervention-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results provide strong support for the acceptability of a new online CBM-I intervention ('FRAME') to promote resilience in women treated for primary breast cancer and indicate that a full-scale trial is feasible. The study fulfiled all pre-specified progression criteria to advance to an efficacy trial, except meeting the recruitment target of 70 participants. Importantly, recruitment took place during the Covid-19 pandemic. Recommendations for future research are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 7","pages":"e70217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the acceptability of a novel Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) intervention, 'FRAME', to promote resilience in women who have completed active treatment for primary breast cancer and determines the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial.

Methods: A two-armed, participant-blind, parallel groups randomised controlled trial of CBM-I versus a time-matched control. Participants were recruited from community organisations and social media. Measures of acceptability, feasibility, change in interpretation bias and clinical outcomes (resilience, mood and quality of life) were assessed at baseline (T0), 1-month post-randomisation (T1, end of intervention), 2-month (T2) and 4-month post-randomisation (T3).

Results: Sixty-seven participants completed baseline assessment and were randomised to the FRAME CBM-I (n = 35) or control group (n = 32). Acceptability of CBM-I met pre-specified progression criteria, and 80% adhered to the CBM-I intervention. Between-group differences in interpretation bias at T1 demonstrated a moderate effect in favour of CBM-I on two measures of interpretation bias (SMDg = 0.66 and 0.73). Effect size estimates suggest moderate treatment effects on resilience (SMDg = 0.64) and small effects on mood, in favour of FRAME. No intervention-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: The study results provide strong support for the acceptability of a new online CBM-I intervention ('FRAME') to promote resilience in women treated for primary breast cancer and indicate that a full-scale trial is feasible. The study fulfiled all pre-specified progression criteria to advance to an efficacy trial, except meeting the recruitment target of 70 participants. Importantly, recruitment took place during the Covid-19 pandemic. Recommendations for future research are provided.

Abstract Image

一种新的数字干预(“FRAME”)促进原发性乳腺癌治疗妇女恢复能力的可行性随机对照试验
目的:本研究探讨了一种新的认知偏差修正解释(CBM-I)干预“FRAME”的可接受性,以促进完成原发性乳腺癌积极治疗的女性的恢复能力,并确定了一项全面随机对照试验的可行性。方法:双臂,参与者盲,平行组随机对照试验CBM-I与时间匹配对照。参与者是从社区组织和社交媒体中招募的。在基线(T0)、随机化后1个月(T1,干预结束)、随机化后2个月(T2)和4个月(T3)评估可接受性、可行性、解释偏差改变和临床结果(恢复力、情绪和生活质量)。结果:67名参与者完成了基线评估,并随机分为FRAME CBM-I组(n = 35)或对照组(n = 32)。CBM-I的可接受性符合预先规定的进展标准,80%的患者坚持了CBM-I干预。T1时解释偏倚的组间差异表明,CBM-I对两种解释偏倚测量有中等影响(SMDg = 0.66和0.73)。效应量估计表明,治疗对恢复力的影响中等(SMDg = 0.64),对情绪的影响较小,有利于FRAME。无干预相关不良事件报告。结论:研究结果为一种新的在线CBM-I干预(“FRAME”)的可接受性提供了强有力的支持,以促进原发性乳腺癌治疗妇女的恢复力,并表明全面试验是可行的。除了满足70名受试者的招募目标外,该研究满足了所有预先指定的进展标准以进入疗效试验。重要的是,招聘是在Covid-19大流行期间进行的。对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信