Intravenous Bronchodilators in Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Samer Abu-Sultaneh, Andrew G Miller, Sangita Basnet, Hannah J Craven, Abdallah Dalabih, Jose Enrique Irazuzta, Christine A Kapuscinski, Christopher J L Newth, Sana J Said, Elizabeth C Whipple, Lynda T Goodfellow, Benjamin R White, Narayan Prabhu Iyer
{"title":"Intravenous Bronchodilators in Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Samer Abu-Sultaneh, Andrew G Miller, Sangita Basnet, Hannah J Craven, Abdallah Dalabih, Jose Enrique Irazuzta, Christine A Kapuscinski, Christopher J L Newth, Sana J Said, Elizabeth C Whipple, Lynda T Goodfellow, Benjamin R White, Narayan Prabhu Iyer","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric critical asthma is one of the most common pediatric illnesses in children admitted to the pediatric ward and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Adjunct intravenous (IV) bronchodilators are often used when initial management with systemic corticosteroids and inhaled short-acting beta agonists (SABA) fail to provide improvement in a patient's clinical condition. While the recent guidelines gave recommendations for the use of different IV bronchodilators compared to placebo, it did not include ranking on which one should be used as first-line or second-line agent. The aim of this network meta-analysis is to determine the effect of IV bronchodilators on patient-centered outcomes and rank medications based on their effectiveness in these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using three databases MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL to identify randomized control trials examining the use of IV magnesium sulfate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>), IV methylxanthines (aminophylline or theophylline), IV SABA (salbutamol, terbutaline) in pediatric critical asthma patients. Bayesian network metanalytic framework was used to compare the interventions. Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% Credible Interval (CrI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials (n = 852) were included in the network meta-analysis. Largest reduction in hospital length of stay (LOS), PICU admission, and PICU LOS were noted with IV MgSO<sub>4</sub>; (MD: -3.1 days, 95% CrI: -6.9 days to 0.13 days), (OR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.02, 1.3), and (MD: -4.0 days, 95% CrI: -7.1 days to -1.2 days) respectively. IV MgSO<sub>4</sub> was ranked first in three outcomes of interest with Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.884 for hospital LOS, 0.919 for PICU admission, and 0.957 for PICU LOS. For preventing intubation, IV SABA was ranked the highest (SUCRA 0.995), but the only study with IV SABA had zero intubation events. In a sensitivity analysis that excluded studies with zero events, the intubation rate was lowest with IV MgSO<sub>4</sub> (OR 0.10; 95% CrI 0.003, 0.88) and it was ranked the best treatment (SUCRA 0.921).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this network meta-analysis comparing different IV adjunct bronchodilators, IV MgSO<sub>4</sub> was ranked first followed by IV SABA, and then IV methylxanthines. Given these findings and the favorable safety profile, ease of use, and low cost, IV MgSO<sub>4</sub> appears most promising the first adjunct IV bronchodilator, however, further large high-quality trials are still needed before it can be endorsed as routine first-line agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 7","pages":"e71192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric critical asthma is one of the most common pediatric illnesses in children admitted to the pediatric ward and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Adjunct intravenous (IV) bronchodilators are often used when initial management with systemic corticosteroids and inhaled short-acting beta agonists (SABA) fail to provide improvement in a patient's clinical condition. While the recent guidelines gave recommendations for the use of different IV bronchodilators compared to placebo, it did not include ranking on which one should be used as first-line or second-line agent. The aim of this network meta-analysis is to determine the effect of IV bronchodilators on patient-centered outcomes and rank medications based on their effectiveness in these outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using three databases MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL to identify randomized control trials examining the use of IV magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), IV methylxanthines (aminophylline or theophylline), IV SABA (salbutamol, terbutaline) in pediatric critical asthma patients. Bayesian network metanalytic framework was used to compare the interventions. Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% Credible Interval (CrI).

Results: Twelve trials (n = 852) were included in the network meta-analysis. Largest reduction in hospital length of stay (LOS), PICU admission, and PICU LOS were noted with IV MgSO4; (MD: -3.1 days, 95% CrI: -6.9 days to 0.13 days), (OR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.02, 1.3), and (MD: -4.0 days, 95% CrI: -7.1 days to -1.2 days) respectively. IV MgSO4 was ranked first in three outcomes of interest with Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.884 for hospital LOS, 0.919 for PICU admission, and 0.957 for PICU LOS. For preventing intubation, IV SABA was ranked the highest (SUCRA 0.995), but the only study with IV SABA had zero intubation events. In a sensitivity analysis that excluded studies with zero events, the intubation rate was lowest with IV MgSO4 (OR 0.10; 95% CrI 0.003, 0.88) and it was ranked the best treatment (SUCRA 0.921).

Conclusions: In this network meta-analysis comparing different IV adjunct bronchodilators, IV MgSO4 was ranked first followed by IV SABA, and then IV methylxanthines. Given these findings and the favorable safety profile, ease of use, and low cost, IV MgSO4 appears most promising the first adjunct IV bronchodilator, however, further large high-quality trials are still needed before it can be endorsed as routine first-line agent.

静脉支气管扩张剂治疗小儿危重哮喘:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
儿科危重哮喘是儿科病房和儿科重症监护病房(PICU)儿童最常见的儿科疾病之一。当最初使用全身皮质类固醇和吸入短效β受体激动剂(SABA)治疗不能改善患者的临床状况时,通常使用辅助静脉注射(IV)支气管扩张剂。虽然最近的指南给出了与安慰剂相比使用不同静脉支气管扩张剂的建议,但它没有包括哪一种应该作为一线或二线药物的排名。本网络荟萃分析的目的是确定静脉支气管扩张剂对以患者为中心的结果的影响,并根据药物在这些结果中的有效性对药物进行排名。方法:使用MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL三个数据库进行系统评价,以确定随机对照试验,研究IV硫酸镁(MgSO4)、IV甲基黄嘌呤(氨茶碱或茶碱)、IV SABA(沙丁胺醇、特布他林)在儿科危重哮喘患者中的应用。采用贝叶斯网络元分析框架对干预措施进行比较。结果以比值比(OR)或平均差(MD)和95%可信区间(CrI)报告。结果:12项试验(n = 852)被纳入网络荟萃分析。静脉MgSO4最大程度地降低了住院时间(LOS)、PICU入院率和PICU LOS;(MD: -3.1天,95% CrI: -6.9天至0.13天),(OR 0.21;95% CrI为0.02,1.3),MD为-4.0天,95% CrI为-7.1天至-1.2天。静脉MgSO4在3个关注的结果中排名第一,医院LOS的累积排名曲线下表面(SUCRA)为0.884,PICU入院时为0.919,PICU LOS为0.957。在预防插管方面,IV SABA排名最高(SUCRA 0.995),但IV SABA的唯一研究无插管事件。在排除零事件研究的敏感性分析中,IV MgSO4插管率最低(OR 0.10;95% CrI为0.003,0.88),SUCRA为最佳治疗(0.921)。结论:在比较不同静脉辅助支气管扩张剂的网络荟萃分析中,静脉注射MgSO4排名第一,其次是静脉注射SABA,然后是静脉注射甲基黄嘌呤。鉴于这些发现以及良好的安全性、易用性和低成本,IV MgSO4似乎是最有希望的第一辅助IV支气管扩张剂,然而,在它被认可为常规一线药物之前,仍需要进一步的大型高质量试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信