Rebecca Petts, Diana Ponsky, Luciane Macedo de Menezes, Tarek ElShebiny, Kristina Wolf, Juan Martin Palomo
{"title":"Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction in an Orthodontic Population Using the NOSE Scale.","authors":"Rebecca Petts, Diana Ponsky, Luciane Macedo de Menezes, Tarek ElShebiny, Kristina Wolf, Juan Martin Palomo","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nasal Airway Obstruction is a common problem affecting 30% of the general population and significantly impacts the quality of life. The objective of this research was to determine nasal airway obstruction prevalence in a population seeking orthodontic treatment using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and to determine if practice modalities play a role.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 431 patients seeking orthodontic care who completed the NOSE survey at an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Obstruction was not correlated with age, gender, or trauma (p < 0.05). The mean of all scores was 8.4 ± 14.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0-9.8), ranging from 0 to 80 on a scale of 100. The prevalence of nasal airway obstruction in the orthodontic population was: mild or above-43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%); moderate or above-11.4% (95% CI: 8.6%-14.9%); severe-2.6% (95% CI: 1.3%-4.5%); and extreme-0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.3%). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference among patients at the three locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction (Mild to Extreme) in orthodontic populations was 43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%), representing or slightly exceeding that of the general population. There was no significant difference between an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice, indicating that the results are widely applicable. Orthodontists are encouraged to use the NOSE scale as a risk assessment tool, providing additional healthcare services to patients and potentially improving their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nasal Airway Obstruction is a common problem affecting 30% of the general population and significantly impacts the quality of life. The objective of this research was to determine nasal airway obstruction prevalence in a population seeking orthodontic treatment using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and to determine if practice modalities play a role.
Methods: The sample consisted of 431 patients seeking orthodontic care who completed the NOSE survey at an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice.
Results: Obstruction was not correlated with age, gender, or trauma (p < 0.05). The mean of all scores was 8.4 ± 14.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0-9.8), ranging from 0 to 80 on a scale of 100. The prevalence of nasal airway obstruction in the orthodontic population was: mild or above-43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%); moderate or above-11.4% (95% CI: 8.6%-14.9%); severe-2.6% (95% CI: 1.3%-4.5%); and extreme-0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.3%). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference among patients at the three locations.
Conclusions: The Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction (Mild to Extreme) in orthodontic populations was 43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%), representing or slightly exceeding that of the general population. There was no significant difference between an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice, indicating that the results are widely applicable. Orthodontists are encouraged to use the NOSE scale as a risk assessment tool, providing additional healthcare services to patients and potentially improving their quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.