Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction in an Orthodontic Population Using the NOSE Scale.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Rebecca Petts, Diana Ponsky, Luciane Macedo de Menezes, Tarek ElShebiny, Kristina Wolf, Juan Martin Palomo
{"title":"Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction in an Orthodontic Population Using the NOSE Scale.","authors":"Rebecca Petts, Diana Ponsky, Luciane Macedo de Menezes, Tarek ElShebiny, Kristina Wolf, Juan Martin Palomo","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nasal Airway Obstruction is a common problem affecting 30% of the general population and significantly impacts the quality of life. The objective of this research was to determine nasal airway obstruction prevalence in a population seeking orthodontic treatment using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and to determine if practice modalities play a role.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 431 patients seeking orthodontic care who completed the NOSE survey at an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Obstruction was not correlated with age, gender, or trauma (p < 0.05). The mean of all scores was 8.4 ± 14.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0-9.8), ranging from 0 to 80 on a scale of 100. The prevalence of nasal airway obstruction in the orthodontic population was: mild or above-43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%); moderate or above-11.4% (95% CI: 8.6%-14.9%); severe-2.6% (95% CI: 1.3%-4.5%); and extreme-0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.3%). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference among patients at the three locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction (Mild to Extreme) in orthodontic populations was 43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%), representing or slightly exceeding that of the general population. There was no significant difference between an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice, indicating that the results are widely applicable. Orthodontists are encouraged to use the NOSE scale as a risk assessment tool, providing additional healthcare services to patients and potentially improving their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nasal Airway Obstruction is a common problem affecting 30% of the general population and significantly impacts the quality of life. The objective of this research was to determine nasal airway obstruction prevalence in a population seeking orthodontic treatment using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and to determine if practice modalities play a role.

Methods: The sample consisted of 431 patients seeking orthodontic care who completed the NOSE survey at an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice.

Results: Obstruction was not correlated with age, gender, or trauma (p < 0.05). The mean of all scores was 8.4 ± 14.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0-9.8), ranging from 0 to 80 on a scale of 100. The prevalence of nasal airway obstruction in the orthodontic population was: mild or above-43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%); moderate or above-11.4% (95% CI: 8.6%-14.9%); severe-2.6% (95% CI: 1.3%-4.5%); and extreme-0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.3%). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference among patients at the three locations.

Conclusions: The Prevalence of Nasal Airway Obstruction (Mild to Extreme) in orthodontic populations was 43.9% (95% CI: 39.1%-48.7%), representing or slightly exceeding that of the general population. There was no significant difference between an orthodontic residency programme, a corporate practice, and a private practice, indicating that the results are widely applicable. Orthodontists are encouraged to use the NOSE scale as a risk assessment tool, providing additional healthcare services to patients and potentially improving their quality of life.

用鼻量表评估正畸人群鼻气道阻塞的患病率。
导言:鼻气道梗阻是影响30%人口的常见问题,严重影响生活质量。本研究的目的是使用鼻塞症状评估(NOSE)量表确定寻求正畸治疗的人群中鼻气道阻塞的患病率,并确定实践方式是否起作用。方法:样本包括431名寻求正畸治疗的患者,他们在正畸住院医师项目、公司诊所和私人诊所完成了NOSE调查。结果:鼻道梗阻与年龄、性别、外伤无关(p)。结论:正畸人群中鼻道梗阻(轻度至重度)的患病率为43.9% (95% CI: 39.1% ~ 48.7%),代表或略高于一般人群。正畸住院医师计划、公司实践和私人实践之间没有显着差异,表明结果广泛适用。我们鼓励正畸医生使用NOSE量表作为风险评估工具,为患者提供额外的医疗保健服务,并有可能改善他们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信