Frailty evaluation for predicting the survival in patients with glioma: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Qiuyan Xiang, Sha Luo, Guangyao Chen, Yiwen Liu
{"title":"Frailty evaluation for predicting the survival in patients with glioma: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Qiuyan Xiang, Sha Luo, Guangyao Chen, Yiwen Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03693-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome associated with decreased physiological reserve, may influence survival outcomes in patients with glioma. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and survival outcomes in glioma patients, with implications for nursing and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included cohort studies investigating frailty and survival in glioma patients. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses using a leave-one-out approach were performed to evaluate the robustness of the finding. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of study characteristics on the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven cohort studies involving 2,519 patients were included. Frailty was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in glioma patients (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.25-1.74, p < 0.001) with moderate heterogeneity (p for Cochrane Q test = 0.12, I² = 35%). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent results across tumor grades (p = 0.92), primary treatments (p = 0.82), age groups (p = 0.14), proportion of men (p = 0.23), frailty assessment methods (p = 0.43), follow-up durations (p = 0.25), analytic models (p = 0.30), and study quality scores (p = 0.21). Meta-regression did not show a significant influence of sample size, mean age, sex, follow-up duration, or study quality score on the association (p all > 0.05). Frailty was also associated with shorter progression-free survival (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06-1.36, p = 0.004) with mild heterogeneity (p for Cochrane Q test = 0.41, I² = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty appears to be a significant predictor of poorer survival in glioma patients, underscoring its importance in clinical decision-making and patient care. Integrating frailty assessments into nursing and treatment protocols could improve outcome predictions and tailored interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03693-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome associated with decreased physiological reserve, may influence survival outcomes in patients with glioma. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and survival outcomes in glioma patients, with implications for nursing and clinical practice.

Methods: This meta-analysis included cohort studies investigating frailty and survival in glioma patients. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses using a leave-one-out approach were performed to evaluate the robustness of the finding. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of study characteristics on the outcome.

Results: Eleven cohort studies involving 2,519 patients were included. Frailty was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in glioma patients (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.25-1.74, p < 0.001) with moderate heterogeneity (p for Cochrane Q test = 0.12, I² = 35%). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent results across tumor grades (p = 0.92), primary treatments (p = 0.82), age groups (p = 0.14), proportion of men (p = 0.23), frailty assessment methods (p = 0.43), follow-up durations (p = 0.25), analytic models (p = 0.30), and study quality scores (p = 0.21). Meta-regression did not show a significant influence of sample size, mean age, sex, follow-up duration, or study quality score on the association (p all > 0.05). Frailty was also associated with shorter progression-free survival (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06-1.36, p = 0.004) with mild heterogeneity (p for Cochrane Q test = 0.41, I² = 0%).

Conclusion: Frailty appears to be a significant predictor of poorer survival in glioma patients, underscoring its importance in clinical decision-making and patient care. Integrating frailty assessments into nursing and treatment protocols could improve outcome predictions and tailored interventions.

衰弱评估预测胶质瘤患者的生存:一项荟萃分析。
背景:虚弱是一种与生理储备下降相关的多维综合征,可能会影响胶质瘤患者的生存结果。本荟萃分析旨在评估神经胶质瘤患者虚弱和生存结果之间的关系,对护理和临床实践具有指导意义。方法:本荟萃分析纳入了研究神经胶质瘤患者虚弱和生存的队列研究。在PubMed, Embase和Web of Science中进行了全面的搜索,截止到2024年10月。风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)采用随机效应模型进行汇总。采用留一方法进行敏感性分析,以评估该发现的稳健性。采用亚组和元回归分析来评估研究特征对结果的影响。结果:纳入了11项队列研究,涉及2519例患者。神经胶质瘤患者虚弱与较差的总生存期(OS)显著相关(HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.25-1.74, p 0.05)。虚弱也与较短的无进展生存期相关(HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06-1.36, p = 0.004),具有轻度异质性(Cochrane Q检验p = 0.41, I²= 0%)。结论:虚弱似乎是胶质瘤患者较差生存的重要预测因素,强调其在临床决策和患者护理中的重要性。将衰弱评估纳入护理和治疗方案可以改善结果预测和量身定制的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信