EVALUATION OF CARAPACIAL REPAIR TECHNIQUES FOR INJURED TURTLES PRESENTING TO A WILDLIFE CLINIC.

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Rachel G Carpenter, Aswini Cherukuri, Gregory A Lewbart, Kim R Love, Sarah M Ozawa
{"title":"EVALUATION OF CARAPACIAL REPAIR TECHNIQUES FOR INJURED TURTLES PRESENTING TO A WILDLIFE CLINIC.","authors":"Rachel G Carpenter, Aswini Cherukuri, Gregory A Lewbart, Kim R Love, Sarah M Ozawa","doi":"10.1638/2024-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chelonians commonly present to the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine's Turtle Rescue Team (TRT) for shell injuries. Several shell repair protocols are described in the literature, but many of these techniques are invasive, require a surgical plane of anesthesia, can result in infections or iatrogenic trauma, and are inaccessible in the wildlife rehabilitation setting. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate three minimally invasive and inexpensive carapace fracture repair methods used at the TRT from 2012-2021. In total, 1,761 turtles presented with carapace fractures. Fracture repairs were performed in 428 turtles and were successful in 236 patients (55.1%). A successful outcome was defined as a fracture that was stable on manual palpation and the patient survived to release. The fracture did not stabilize but the subject survived to release in 13 cases (3.0%). Out of the repairs performed, there were 110 (25.7%) hook-and-wire procedures, 93 (21.7%) fragment removals, 94 (21.9%) marginal hole-and-wire repairs, and 131 (30.6%) repairs that included a combination of procedures. Success rates were highest for fragment removal (69.9%), followed by marginal hole- and-wire repairs (63.8%). The combined hook-and-wire procedures with fragment removal achieved a success rate of 57.9%, while hook-and-wire procedures alone saw a success rate of 47.3%. No complications arising from stabilization procedures were reported. The odds of success were significantly higher in adult males (OR = 3.904, 95% CI = 1.200, 12.705) and females (OR = 3.636, 95% CI = 1.087, 12.158) compared to juvenile turtles. A prognostic scoring system was developed based on published literature and clinical experience at TRT; the odds of success decreased as the prognosis moved from excellent to grave (OR = 0.330, 95% CI = 0.233, 0.458). These minimally invasive techniques should be considered in future chelonian fracture repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"56 2","pages":"316-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chelonians commonly present to the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine's Turtle Rescue Team (TRT) for shell injuries. Several shell repair protocols are described in the literature, but many of these techniques are invasive, require a surgical plane of anesthesia, can result in infections or iatrogenic trauma, and are inaccessible in the wildlife rehabilitation setting. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate three minimally invasive and inexpensive carapace fracture repair methods used at the TRT from 2012-2021. In total, 1,761 turtles presented with carapace fractures. Fracture repairs were performed in 428 turtles and were successful in 236 patients (55.1%). A successful outcome was defined as a fracture that was stable on manual palpation and the patient survived to release. The fracture did not stabilize but the subject survived to release in 13 cases (3.0%). Out of the repairs performed, there were 110 (25.7%) hook-and-wire procedures, 93 (21.7%) fragment removals, 94 (21.9%) marginal hole-and-wire repairs, and 131 (30.6%) repairs that included a combination of procedures. Success rates were highest for fragment removal (69.9%), followed by marginal hole- and-wire repairs (63.8%). The combined hook-and-wire procedures with fragment removal achieved a success rate of 57.9%, while hook-and-wire procedures alone saw a success rate of 47.3%. No complications arising from stabilization procedures were reported. The odds of success were significantly higher in adult males (OR = 3.904, 95% CI = 1.200, 12.705) and females (OR = 3.636, 95% CI = 1.087, 12.158) compared to juvenile turtles. A prognostic scoring system was developed based on published literature and clinical experience at TRT; the odds of success decreased as the prognosis moved from excellent to grave (OR = 0.330, 95% CI = 0.233, 0.458). These minimally invasive techniques should be considered in future chelonian fracture repairs.

野生动物诊所评估受伤海龟的龟壳修复技术。
龟通常会出现在北卡罗来纳州立大学兽医学院的海龟救援队(TRT)。文献中描述了几种外壳修复方案,但其中许多技术是侵入性的,需要麻醉手术平面,可能导致感染或医源性创伤,并且在野生动物康复环境中无法实现。本研究的目的是回顾性评估2012-2021年在TRT使用的三种微创和廉价的甲壳骨折修复方法。总共有1761只海龟出现甲壳骨折。对428只海龟进行骨折修复,其中236例(55.1%)成功。成功的结果被定义为骨折在手触诊时稳定,患者存活并释放。骨折未稳定,但13例(3.0%)患者存活并松解。在进行的修复中,有110例(25.7%)采用钩丝修复,93例(21.7%)采用碎片清除,94例(21.9%)采用边缘孔丝修复,131例(30.6%)采用综合修复。碎片移除成功率最高(69.9%),其次是边缘孔线修复(63.8%)。钩丝结合碎片清除手术的成功率为57.9%,而单独钩丝手术的成功率为47.3%。无稳定手术并发症的报道。与幼龟相比,成年雄龟(OR = 3.904, 95% CI = 1.200, 12.705)和雌龟(OR = 3.636, 95% CI = 1.087, 12.158)的成功率显著高于幼龟。根据已发表的文献和TRT的临床经验,开发了预后评分系统;随着预后从优到差,成功率降低(OR = 0.330, 95% CI = 0.233, 0.458)。这些微创技术应该在未来的龟骨骨折修复中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers. The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution. Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信