Risk of Open Conversion During Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Optimizing Patient Selection.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Courtney Chen, Tiffany Lim, Annie Yang, Ian Lau, Kelly Mahuron, Ryuhei Aoyama, Michael Sullivan, Bradford Kim, Aaron Lewis, Laleh Melstrom, I Benjamin Paz, Yuman Fong, Yanghee Woo
{"title":"Risk of Open Conversion During Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Optimizing Patient Selection.","authors":"Courtney Chen, Tiffany Lim, Annie Yang, Ian Lau, Kelly Mahuron, Ryuhei Aoyama, Michael Sullivan, Bradford Kim, Aaron Lewis, Laleh Melstrom, I Benjamin Paz, Yuman Fong, Yanghee Woo","doi":"10.1002/jso.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) shows recovery benefits compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. While open conversion (OC) is associated with poorer outcomes, factors influencing robotic gastrectomy (RG) OC are obscure. We identified preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for OC and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of RG using a prospectively maintained GC database from a high-volume comprehensive US cancer center between January 2010 and October 2022. RG standardization began in July 2015, with ongoing expansion of patient selection criteria. Patients who underwent radical resection with biopsy-proved GC were included in the analysis if the operation was initiated robotically. Preoperative documentation of likely to convert to open procedures was identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 289 gastrectomy cases, 133 (46.0%) were RG. Before RG standardization, OC rate was 42.1% (n = 8/19); then decreased to 15.8% (n = 18/114). Factors causing unplanned OC included instability upon insufflation (7.7%), difficult esophagojejunostomy (23.1%), bulky nodes (26.9%), and tumor invasion/fibrosis (38.5%). On multivariate analysis, Preoperative EUS (OR 0.78) decreased OC likelihood, whereas prior abdominal surgeries (OR 1.31) increased OC likelihood (p < 0.05). D2 lymphadenectomy and neoadjuvant treatment did not increase OC likelihood.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-operatively identifiable OC factors can guide RG patient selection. Yet, certain intraoperative findings challenge RG and require improved preoperative planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Robotic surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) shows recovery benefits compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. While open conversion (OC) is associated with poorer outcomes, factors influencing robotic gastrectomy (RG) OC are obscure. We identified preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for OC and associated outcomes.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of RG using a prospectively maintained GC database from a high-volume comprehensive US cancer center between January 2010 and October 2022. RG standardization began in July 2015, with ongoing expansion of patient selection criteria. Patients who underwent radical resection with biopsy-proved GC were included in the analysis if the operation was initiated robotically. Preoperative documentation of likely to convert to open procedures was identified.

Results: Of 289 gastrectomy cases, 133 (46.0%) were RG. Before RG standardization, OC rate was 42.1% (n = 8/19); then decreased to 15.8% (n = 18/114). Factors causing unplanned OC included instability upon insufflation (7.7%), difficult esophagojejunostomy (23.1%), bulky nodes (26.9%), and tumor invasion/fibrosis (38.5%). On multivariate analysis, Preoperative EUS (OR 0.78) decreased OC likelihood, whereas prior abdominal surgeries (OR 1.31) increased OC likelihood (p < 0.05). D2 lymphadenectomy and neoadjuvant treatment did not increase OC likelihood.

Conclusions: Pre-operatively identifiable OC factors can guide RG patient selection. Yet, certain intraoperative findings challenge RG and require improved preoperative planning.

胃癌机器人胃切除术中开放性转换的风险:优化患者选择。
背景和目的:与开放和腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术治疗胃腺癌(GC)显示出恢复优势。虽然开放式胃切除术(OC)与较差的预后相关,但影响机器人胃切除术(RG) OC的因素尚不清楚。我们确定了术前和术中卵巢癌的危险因素及相关结果。方法:我们使用2010年1月至2022年10月期间来自美国一个大容量综合癌症中心前瞻性维护的GC数据库对RG进行回顾性分析。随着患者选择标准的不断扩大,RG标准化始于2015年7月。如果手术是机器人启动的,那么接受根治性切除并活检证实的胃癌患者也被纳入分析。确定了可能转为开放式手术的术前文件。结果:289例胃切除术中,RG 133例(46.0%)。RG标准化前,OC率为42.1% (n = 8/19);然后下降到15.8% (n = 18/114)。导致计划外OC的因素包括充气性不稳定(7.7%)、食管空肠吻合术困难(23.1%)、淋巴结肿大(26.9%)和肿瘤侵袭/纤维化(38.5%)。在多因素分析中,术前EUS (OR 0.78)降低了OC的可能性,而既往腹部手术(OR 1.31)增加了OC的可能性(p)。结论:术前可识别的OC因素可以指导RG患者的选择。然而,某些术中发现对RG提出了挑战,需要改进术前计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信