Courtney Chen, Tiffany Lim, Annie Yang, Ian Lau, Kelly Mahuron, Ryuhei Aoyama, Michael Sullivan, Bradford Kim, Aaron Lewis, Laleh Melstrom, I Benjamin Paz, Yuman Fong, Yanghee Woo
{"title":"Risk of Open Conversion During Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Optimizing Patient Selection.","authors":"Courtney Chen, Tiffany Lim, Annie Yang, Ian Lau, Kelly Mahuron, Ryuhei Aoyama, Michael Sullivan, Bradford Kim, Aaron Lewis, Laleh Melstrom, I Benjamin Paz, Yuman Fong, Yanghee Woo","doi":"10.1002/jso.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) shows recovery benefits compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. While open conversion (OC) is associated with poorer outcomes, factors influencing robotic gastrectomy (RG) OC are obscure. We identified preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for OC and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of RG using a prospectively maintained GC database from a high-volume comprehensive US cancer center between January 2010 and October 2022. RG standardization began in July 2015, with ongoing expansion of patient selection criteria. Patients who underwent radical resection with biopsy-proved GC were included in the analysis if the operation was initiated robotically. Preoperative documentation of likely to convert to open procedures was identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 289 gastrectomy cases, 133 (46.0%) were RG. Before RG standardization, OC rate was 42.1% (n = 8/19); then decreased to 15.8% (n = 18/114). Factors causing unplanned OC included instability upon insufflation (7.7%), difficult esophagojejunostomy (23.1%), bulky nodes (26.9%), and tumor invasion/fibrosis (38.5%). On multivariate analysis, Preoperative EUS (OR 0.78) decreased OC likelihood, whereas prior abdominal surgeries (OR 1.31) increased OC likelihood (p < 0.05). D2 lymphadenectomy and neoadjuvant treatment did not increase OC likelihood.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-operatively identifiable OC factors can guide RG patient selection. Yet, certain intraoperative findings challenge RG and require improved preoperative planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Robotic surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) shows recovery benefits compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. While open conversion (OC) is associated with poorer outcomes, factors influencing robotic gastrectomy (RG) OC are obscure. We identified preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for OC and associated outcomes.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of RG using a prospectively maintained GC database from a high-volume comprehensive US cancer center between January 2010 and October 2022. RG standardization began in July 2015, with ongoing expansion of patient selection criteria. Patients who underwent radical resection with biopsy-proved GC were included in the analysis if the operation was initiated robotically. Preoperative documentation of likely to convert to open procedures was identified.
Results: Of 289 gastrectomy cases, 133 (46.0%) were RG. Before RG standardization, OC rate was 42.1% (n = 8/19); then decreased to 15.8% (n = 18/114). Factors causing unplanned OC included instability upon insufflation (7.7%), difficult esophagojejunostomy (23.1%), bulky nodes (26.9%), and tumor invasion/fibrosis (38.5%). On multivariate analysis, Preoperative EUS (OR 0.78) decreased OC likelihood, whereas prior abdominal surgeries (OR 1.31) increased OC likelihood (p < 0.05). D2 lymphadenectomy and neoadjuvant treatment did not increase OC likelihood.
Conclusions: Pre-operatively identifiable OC factors can guide RG patient selection. Yet, certain intraoperative findings challenge RG and require improved preoperative planning.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.