Age-stratified pharmacovigilance of azithromycin: a multimethod signal detection analysis in the FAERS database.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2525356
Zhenpo Zhang, Jiangxiong Li, Jingping Zheng, Yankun Liang, Lin Ma, Ling Su
{"title":"Age-stratified pharmacovigilance of azithromycin: a multimethod signal detection analysis in the FAERS database.","authors":"Zhenpo Zhang, Jiangxiong Li, Jingping Zheng, Yankun Liang, Lin Ma, Ling Su","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2525356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azithromycin, a widely prescribed macrolide antibiotic, faces emerging safety concerns due to inappropriate use and age-specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study characterises age-stratified safety profiles of azithromycin using pharmacovigilance data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adverse event (AE) reports for azithromycin prescribed in Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia treatment (2004-2024) were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Disproportionality analyses (Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker) identified safety signals across four age groups: 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, and ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7,496 AE reports, age-specific risks varied significantly. Paediatric populations (0-17 years) exhibited predominant cutaneous/hypersensitivity reactions (rash, pruritus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome) and unlabelled psychiatric signals (hallucinations). Adults (18-44 years) showed pregnancy-related risks (preterm delivery). Geriatric patients (≥65 years) had heightened cardiac risks (QT prolongation, torsades de pointes), often exacerbated by off-label COVID-19 use. The 45-64-year cohort displayed the highest signal frequency, primarily involving drug hypersensitivity. Off-label prescribing accounted for 65% of geriatric AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Azithromycin safety profiles differ markedly across age groups. Children face dermatologic and neuropsychiatric risks, while elderly patients are vulnerable to cardiac complications. Strict adherence to labelled indications, age-specific monitoring, and avoidance of off-label use - particularly during public health crises - are critical to mitigating ADRs. These findings underscore the need for stratified clinical decision-making and targeted pharmacovigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2525356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2525356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Azithromycin, a widely prescribed macrolide antibiotic, faces emerging safety concerns due to inappropriate use and age-specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study characterises age-stratified safety profiles of azithromycin using pharmacovigilance data.

Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports for azithromycin prescribed in Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia treatment (2004-2024) were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Disproportionality analyses (Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker) identified safety signals across four age groups: 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, and ≥65 years.

Results: Among 7,496 AE reports, age-specific risks varied significantly. Paediatric populations (0-17 years) exhibited predominant cutaneous/hypersensitivity reactions (rash, pruritus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome) and unlabelled psychiatric signals (hallucinations). Adults (18-44 years) showed pregnancy-related risks (preterm delivery). Geriatric patients (≥65 years) had heightened cardiac risks (QT prolongation, torsades de pointes), often exacerbated by off-label COVID-19 use. The 45-64-year cohort displayed the highest signal frequency, primarily involving drug hypersensitivity. Off-label prescribing accounted for 65% of geriatric AEs.

Conclusion: Azithromycin safety profiles differ markedly across age groups. Children face dermatologic and neuropsychiatric risks, while elderly patients are vulnerable to cardiac complications. Strict adherence to labelled indications, age-specific monitoring, and avoidance of off-label use - particularly during public health crises - are critical to mitigating ADRs. These findings underscore the need for stratified clinical decision-making and targeted pharmacovigilance.

阿奇霉素的年龄分层药物警戒:FAERS数据库中的多方法信号检测分析。
背景:阿奇霉素是一种广泛使用的大环内酯类抗生素,由于使用不当和年龄特异性药物不良反应(adr)而面临新的安全性问题。本研究利用药物警戒数据对阿奇霉素的年龄分层安全性特征进行了描述。方法:从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中提取2004-2024年阿奇霉素治疗肺炎支原体肺炎的不良事件报告。歧化分析(报告优势比、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络、多项目伽玛泊松收缩器)确定了4个年龄组的安全信号:0-17岁、18-44岁、45-64岁和≥65岁。结果:7496例AE报告中,年龄特异性风险差异显著。儿童人群(0-17岁)表现出主要的皮肤/过敏反应(皮疹、瘙痒、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征)和未标记的精神信号(幻觉)。成人(18-44岁)存在妊娠相关风险(早产)。老年患者(≥65岁)有较高的心脏风险(QT间期延长、心尖扭转),通常因非适应症用药而加剧。45-64岁的队列显示出最高的信号频率,主要涉及药物过敏。标签外处方占老年ae的65%。结论:阿奇霉素的安全性在不同年龄组之间存在显著差异。儿童面临皮肤和神经精神方面的风险,而老年患者容易出现心脏并发症。严格遵守标签适应症、针对特定年龄的监测和避免超标签使用——特别是在公共卫生危机期间——对减轻不良反应至关重要。这些发现强调了分层临床决策和有针对性的药物警戒的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信