Oral tofacitinib in comparison with dexamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Anubha Dev, Keshavamurthy Vinay, Anuradha Bishnoi, Muthu Sendhil Kumaran, Hitaishi Mehta, Davinder Parsad
{"title":"Oral tofacitinib in comparison with dexamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Anubha Dev, Keshavamurthy Vinay, Anuradha Bishnoi, Muthu Sendhil Kumaran, Hitaishi Mehta, Davinder Parsad","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of literature on stabilizing and repigmenting potential of oral tofacitinib in active vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of oral tofacitinib with oral mini-pulse therapy in active vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial recruited patients aged 18-60 with active nonsegmental vitiligo. Participants were randomized to receive dexamethasone 2.5 mg twice a week (group A) or oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (group B) for 24 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of observation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients showing ≥50% improvement in vitiligo extent score (VES) at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were recruited (30 per group), with 49 completing 36 weeks. At 24 weeks, the proportion achieving ≥50% VES improvement was similar (16.7% vs 20.0%, P = .833). By 36 weeks, group B had a significantly greater VES decrease (31.5 ± 24.9% vs 16.7 ± 34.8%, P = .031). Group A had higher treatment failure at 12 weeks (20% vs 3.3%, P = .049), but comparable stabilization rates at 24 weeks (63.3% vs 83.3%, P = .171).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limited sample size, single-center design, and lack of double-blinding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tofacitinib is more effective than oral mini-pulse (dexamethasone 2.5 mg twice a week) for treating active nonsegmental vitiligo.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2025.06.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of literature on stabilizing and repigmenting potential of oral tofacitinib in active vitiligo.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral tofacitinib with oral mini-pulse therapy in active vitiligo.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial recruited patients aged 18-60 with active nonsegmental vitiligo. Participants were randomized to receive dexamethasone 2.5 mg twice a week (group A) or oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (group B) for 24 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of observation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients showing ≥50% improvement in vitiligo extent score (VES) at 24 weeks.

Results: Sixty patients were recruited (30 per group), with 49 completing 36 weeks. At 24 weeks, the proportion achieving ≥50% VES improvement was similar (16.7% vs 20.0%, P = .833). By 36 weeks, group B had a significantly greater VES decrease (31.5 ± 24.9% vs 16.7 ± 34.8%, P = .031). Group A had higher treatment failure at 12 weeks (20% vs 3.3%, P = .049), but comparable stabilization rates at 24 weeks (63.3% vs 83.3%, P = .171).

Limitations: Limited sample size, single-center design, and lack of double-blinding.

Conclusion: Tofacitinib is more effective than oral mini-pulse (dexamethasone 2.5 mg twice a week) for treating active nonsegmental vitiligo.

口服托法替尼与地塞米松口服微脉冲治疗活动性非节段性白癜风的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:缺乏关于口服托法替尼治疗活动性白癜风的稳定和重色素潜力的文献。目的:比较口服托法替尼与口服微脉冲治疗活动性白癜风的疗效。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、研究者-盲法试验招募了18-60岁的活动性非节段性白癜风患者。受试者随机接受地塞米松2.5 mg /周2次(a组)或口服托法替尼5 mg /天2次(B组),疗程24周,随访12周。主要终点是24周时白癜风程度评分(VES)改善≥50%的患者比例。结果:招募了60例患者(每组30例),其中49例完成了36周。24周时,VES改善≥50%的比例相似(16.7% vs 20.0%, P = 0.833)。36周时,B组VES下降幅度明显大于对照组(31.5±24.9% vs 16.7±34.8%,P = 0.031)。A组在12周时治疗失败率较高(20% vs 3.3%, P = 0.049),但在24周时稳定率相当(63.3% vs 83.3%, P = 0.171)。局限性:样本量有限,单中心设计,缺乏双盲。结论:托法替尼治疗活动性非节段性白癜风的疗效优于口服小脉冲地塞米松2.5 mg / 2次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
2023
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信