Role of Artificial Intelligence in Minimizing Missed and Undiagnosed Fractures Among Trainee Residents.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-07-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S525183
Mir Sadat-Ali, Hussain Khalil Al Omar, Muath M Alneghaimshi, Abdallah M AlHossan, Abdullah M Baragabh
{"title":"Role of Artificial Intelligence in Minimizing Missed and Undiagnosed Fractures Among Trainee Residents.","authors":"Mir Sadat-Ali, Hussain Khalil Al Omar, Muath M Alneghaimshi, Abdallah M AlHossan, Abdullah M Baragabh","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S525183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Traumatic Fractures and dislocations are missed up to 10% at the first line of defense in the emergency room and by the junior orthopedic residents in training. This review was done to evaluate the accuracy of AI-assisted fracture detection and to compare with the residents in training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched all related electronic databases for English language literature between January 2015 and July 2023, Pub Med, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Allied Health Literature, with keywords of Artificial Intelligence, fractures, dislocations, X-rays, radiographs and missed diagnosis. The data extracted included a number of patients/images studied, site of fractures analyzed, algorithms used, the accuracy of the report based on the algorithm, sensitivity, and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), comparison between the algorithm, junior orthopedic resident, emergency physicians, and board certified radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven publications fulfilled our objectives and were analyzed in detail. Ninety-two thousand two hundred and thirty-six images were analyzed for fractures, which showed that the overall accuracy of the correct diagnosis was 90.35±6.88%, sensitivity 90.08±8.2%, specificity 90.16±7 and AUC was 0.931±0.06. The accuracy of the AI model was 94.24±4.19, and that of orthopedic resident was 85.18±7.01 (P value of <0.0001), with sensitivity 92.15±7.12 versus 86.38±7.6 (P<0.0001) and specificity of 93.77±4.03 versus 87.05±12.9 (P<0.0001). A single study compared 1703 hip fracture images between the AI model versus orthopedic resident and board-certified radiologist and found the accuracy to be 98% versus 87% and 92% (P value of <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review accentuates AI's potential for accurate diagnosis of fractures. We believe the AI algorithm should be incorporated in the emergency rooms where trainee residents and junior orthopedic residents could routinely use AI so that the incidence of missed fractures can be curtailed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"3851-3858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S525183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Traumatic Fractures and dislocations are missed up to 10% at the first line of defense in the emergency room and by the junior orthopedic residents in training. This review was done to evaluate the accuracy of AI-assisted fracture detection and to compare with the residents in training.

Methods: We searched all related electronic databases for English language literature between January 2015 and July 2023, Pub Med, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Allied Health Literature, with keywords of Artificial Intelligence, fractures, dislocations, X-rays, radiographs and missed diagnosis. The data extracted included a number of patients/images studied, site of fractures analyzed, algorithms used, the accuracy of the report based on the algorithm, sensitivity, and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), comparison between the algorithm, junior orthopedic resident, emergency physicians, and board certified radiologists.

Results: Twenty-seven publications fulfilled our objectives and were analyzed in detail. Ninety-two thousand two hundred and thirty-six images were analyzed for fractures, which showed that the overall accuracy of the correct diagnosis was 90.35±6.88%, sensitivity 90.08±8.2%, specificity 90.16±7 and AUC was 0.931±0.06. The accuracy of the AI model was 94.24±4.19, and that of orthopedic resident was 85.18±7.01 (P value of <0.0001), with sensitivity 92.15±7.12 versus 86.38±7.6 (P<0.0001) and specificity of 93.77±4.03 versus 87.05±12.9 (P<0.0001). A single study compared 1703 hip fracture images between the AI model versus orthopedic resident and board-certified radiologist and found the accuracy to be 98% versus 87% and 92% (P value of <0.0001).

Conclusion: This review accentuates AI's potential for accurate diagnosis of fractures. We believe the AI algorithm should be incorporated in the emergency rooms where trainee residents and junior orthopedic residents could routinely use AI so that the incidence of missed fractures can be curtailed.

人工智能在减少住院实习医师骨折漏诊和未诊断骨折中的作用。
背景和目的:创伤性骨折和脱位在急诊室的第一道防线和在培训中的初级骨科住院医师中有高达10%的漏诊率。本综述旨在评估人工智能辅助骨折检测的准确性,并与培训中的住院医生进行比较。方法:检索2015年1月至2023年7月Pub Med、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase、EBSCO联合健康文献累积索引(Cumulative Index to Allied Health literature)中所有相关电子数据库的英文文献,关键词为人工智能、骨折、脱位、x射线、x线片和漏诊。提取的数据包括研究的一些患者/图像、分析的骨折部位、使用的算法、基于算法的报告的准确性、敏感性和特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)、算法、初级骨科住院医师、急诊医生和委员会认证的放射科医生之间的比较。结果:27篇文献达到了我们的目的,并进行了详细的分析。对92,236张骨折图像进行分析,结果表明,正确诊断的总体准确率为90.35±6.88%,灵敏度为90.08±8.2%,特异性为90.16±7,AUC为0.931±0.06。人工智能模型的准确率为94.24±4.19,骨科住院医师的准确率为85.18±7.01 (P值)。结论:本综述强调了人工智能在骨折准确诊断中的潜力。我们认为人工智能算法应该被纳入急诊室,实习住院医生和初级骨科住院医生可以经常使用人工智能,这样可以减少骨折漏诊的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信