A Salmonella enterica Surrogate for Future Validation Studies for Nonfat Dried Milk and Low-Moisture Food Environments

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Kavita Patil , Manita Adhikari , Peter Rubinelli , Jennifer C. Acuff
{"title":"A Salmonella enterica Surrogate for Future Validation Studies for Nonfat Dried Milk and Low-Moisture Food Environments","authors":"Kavita Patil ,&nbsp;Manita Adhikari ,&nbsp;Peter Rubinelli ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Acuff","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low-moisture food persistent bacterial populations (LMF PBPs) may be responsible for pathogen harborage in LMF processing environments, resulting in outbreaks and recalls. To address this issue, industry requires a surrogate to understand the survivability of LMF PBP and perform in-plant validation studies to reduce the level of this pathogen to an acceptable level. Hygienic controls for the LMF industry must be tailored to different equipment, environments, and food types. In-plant validations with a surrogate would assist with evaluating the efficacy of sanitation protocols that eliminate LMF PBPs and harborage. This study explored surrogates for <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBP to provide tools for challenge studies to eliminate LMF PBPs from stainless-steel surfaces. Three surrogates (<em>Escherichia coli</em> MP 26, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, <em>Pediococcus acidilactici</em>) were evaluated for similarity to a <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBP in nonfat dried milk (NFDM) formed on stainless steel coupons stored at 30% or 70% relative humidity (RH) at 25 °C. Coupons were prepared with a previously established method to form an LMF PBP (0.5 g of NFDM, 0.4 mL culture). Microbial survival was enumerated at intervals (0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days) using standard plating techniques. An ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to compare log reductions to identify suitable surrogates. <em>E. faecium</em> exhibited higher survival trends that were most similar to <em>Salmonella</em>, with no significant differences in log reductions (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). In contrast, <em>E. coli</em> surrogate panel and <em>P. acidilactici</em> showed significantly greater reductions, making them unsuitable surrogate candidates for <em>Salmonella</em>. Matrices and RH interactions influenced survival, but <em>E. faecium</em> consistently mirrored <em>Salmonella</em> behavior. <em>E. faecium</em> was similar but hardier than <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBPs and could be used in processing environments for challenging and validating sanitation protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 9","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-moisture food persistent bacterial populations (LMF PBPs) may be responsible for pathogen harborage in LMF processing environments, resulting in outbreaks and recalls. To address this issue, industry requires a surrogate to understand the survivability of LMF PBP and perform in-plant validation studies to reduce the level of this pathogen to an acceptable level. Hygienic controls for the LMF industry must be tailored to different equipment, environments, and food types. In-plant validations with a surrogate would assist with evaluating the efficacy of sanitation protocols that eliminate LMF PBPs and harborage. This study explored surrogates for Salmonella LMF PBP to provide tools for challenge studies to eliminate LMF PBPs from stainless-steel surfaces. Three surrogates (Escherichia coli MP 26, Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici) were evaluated for similarity to a Salmonella LMF PBP in nonfat dried milk (NFDM) formed on stainless steel coupons stored at 30% or 70% relative humidity (RH) at 25 °C. Coupons were prepared with a previously established method to form an LMF PBP (0.5 g of NFDM, 0.4 mL culture). Microbial survival was enumerated at intervals (0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days) using standard plating techniques. An ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to compare log reductions to identify suitable surrogates. E. faecium exhibited higher survival trends that were most similar to Salmonella, with no significant differences in log reductions (p > 0.05). In contrast, E. coli surrogate panel and P. acidilactici showed significantly greater reductions, making them unsuitable surrogate candidates for Salmonella. Matrices and RH interactions influenced survival, but E. faecium consistently mirrored Salmonella behavior. E. faecium was similar but hardier than Salmonella LMF PBPs and could be used in processing environments for challenging and validating sanitation protocols.
一种肠道沙门氏菌替代物,用于脱脂奶粉和低水分食品环境的未来验证研究。
低水分食物持久性细菌种群(LMF PBPs)可能是LMF加工环境中病原体的温床,导致疫情和召回。为了解决这个问题,工业界需要一个替代品来了解LMF PBP的生存能力,并进行植物内验证研究,以将这种病原体的水平降低到可接受的水平。LMF行业的卫生控制必须针对不同的设备、环境和食品类型进行调整。用替代品进行厂内验证将有助于评估消除LMF PBPs和窝藏的卫生方案的有效性。本研究探索了沙门氏菌LMF PBP的替代品,为挑战研究提供工具,以消除不锈钢表面的LMF PBP。在相对湿度为30%或70%、温度为25℃的不锈钢制品中,研究了3种替代物(大肠杆菌MP 26、屎肠球菌、酸化Pediococcus)与脱脂奶粉(NFDM)中沙门氏菌LMF PBP的相似性。用先前建立的方法制备券,形成LMF PBP (0.5 g NFDM, 0.4 mL培养物)。使用标准电镀技术,每隔一段时间(0、1、3、5和7天)对微生物存活率进行计数。方差分析和Tukey的HSD检验用于比较对数减少,以确定合适的替代品。粪肠杆菌表现出与沙门氏菌最相似的更高的生存趋势,在对数降低方面没有显著差异(p >0.05)。相比之下,大肠杆菌替代面板和P. acidilactii显示出明显更大的减少,使它们不适合作为沙门氏菌的替代候选人。基质和RH相互作用影响存活,但粪肠杆菌始终反映沙门氏菌的行为。粪肠杆菌与沙门氏菌相似,但比LMF PBPs更顽强,可用于加工环境,以挑战和验证卫生方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信