Clinical efficacy of mixed-reality holographic imaging-based nonsurgical periodontal therapy: A randomized controlled split-mouth study

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Rui Zhang , Yichong Sun , Yong Zhang , Jun Dai , Jianxia Hou , Fei Xue
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of mixed-reality holographic imaging-based nonsurgical periodontal therapy: A randomized controlled split-mouth study","authors":"Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yichong Sun ,&nbsp;Yong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jun Dai ,&nbsp;Jianxia Hou ,&nbsp;Fei Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial compared the short-term clinical efficacy of mixed-reality holographic imaging-based scaling and root planing (MR-SRP) and conventional SRP (C-SRP) in the treatment of severe periodontitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with generalized stage III periodontitis (grade B or C) were recruited. Using a split-mouth design, the contralateral quadrants were randomly assigned to receive either MR-SRP or C-SRP. The primary outcome measure was the number of sites with both a probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP). Multivariate multilevel logistic regression models were used to quantify the effects of treatment modality, sex, smoking status, tooth type, site characteristics, and baseline PPD on treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the 3-month follow-up, both modalities yielded significant reductions in the number of sites with a PPD ≥5 mm and BOP compared with baseline (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that MR-SRP treatment (OR = 1.37, <em>p</em> = 0.02), middle site (OR = 1.44, <em>p</em> = 0.03), molar (OR = 0.30, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), and baseline PPD (OR = 0.26, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) were significantly associated with site healing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with C-SRP, the MR-SRP approach demonstrated superior short-term clinical outcomes, likely due to the achieved three-dimensional visualization of periodontal structures.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Within the limits of the present study, mixed-reality holographic imaging could be a clinically variable adjunct tool for periodontal therapy. This technology shows promise for managing severe periodontitis, potentially improving treatment outcomes through enhanced visualization and instrument navigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105963"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225004075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial compared the short-term clinical efficacy of mixed-reality holographic imaging-based scaling and root planing (MR-SRP) and conventional SRP (C-SRP) in the treatment of severe periodontitis.

Methods

Patients with generalized stage III periodontitis (grade B or C) were recruited. Using a split-mouth design, the contralateral quadrants were randomly assigned to receive either MR-SRP or C-SRP. The primary outcome measure was the number of sites with both a probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP). Multivariate multilevel logistic regression models were used to quantify the effects of treatment modality, sex, smoking status, tooth type, site characteristics, and baseline PPD on treatment outcomes.

Results

At the 3-month follow-up, both modalities yielded significant reductions in the number of sites with a PPD ≥5 mm and BOP compared with baseline (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that MR-SRP treatment (OR = 1.37, p = 0.02), middle site (OR = 1.44, p = 0.03), molar (OR = 0.30, p < 0.01), and baseline PPD (OR = 0.26, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with site healing.

Conclusions

Compared with C-SRP, the MR-SRP approach demonstrated superior short-term clinical outcomes, likely due to the achieved three-dimensional visualization of periodontal structures.

Clinical significance

Within the limits of the present study, mixed-reality holographic imaging could be a clinically variable adjunct tool for periodontal therapy. This technology shows promise for managing severe periodontitis, potentially improving treatment outcomes through enhanced visualization and instrument navigation.
基于混合现实全息成像的牙周非手术治疗的临床疗效:一项随机对照裂口研究。
目的:本随机、对照、裂口临床试验比较基于混合现实全息成像的刮治和根刨(MR-SRP)和常规刮治(C-SRP)治疗重度牙周炎的短期临床疗效。方法:招募广泛性III期牙周炎(B级或C级)患者。采用裂口设计,对侧象限被随机分配接受MR-SRP或C-SRP。主要结局指标是穿刺袋深度(PPD)≥5mm和穿刺出血(BOP)的部位数量。采用多变量多水平logistic回归模型量化治疗方式、性别、吸烟状况、牙齿类型、部位特征和基线PPD对治疗结果的影响。结果:在3个月的随访中,与基线相比,两种方法均显著减少了PPD≥5mm和BOP的部位数量(p)。结论:与C-SRP相比,MR-SRP方法表现出更优越的短期临床结果,可能是由于实现了牙周结构的三维可视化。临床意义:在本研究的限制下,混合现实全息成像可以成为临床可变的牙周治疗辅助工具。这项技术显示了治疗严重牙周炎的希望,通过增强可视化和仪器导航,有可能改善治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信