Mapping the Effects of Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sofia Pantis, Dian Lyu, Weichen Huang, Abby Kwon, Claire Cheng, Anna Duong, Eileen Ma, Kieran C R Fox, Josef Parvizi
{"title":"Mapping the Effects of Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex.","authors":"Sofia Pantis, Dian Lyu, Weichen Huang, Abby Kwon, Claire Cheng, Anna Duong, Eileen Ma, Kieran C R Fox, Josef Parvizi","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior findings on direct intracranial electrical stimulation (iES) of the human orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), which includes the orbital and ventromedial prefrontal regions, have been mixed, with several reports lacking replication. We aimed to clarify the effects of iES in the OFC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 608 stimulations across 277 OFC site pairs (352 sites total) in 49 patients collected over 17 years of our practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 24.4% of sites as responsive to iES, with subjects reporting visual and olfactory sensations. However, post hoc analysis revealed that these responses largely originated from the stimulation of nearby non-OFC optic and olfactory structures. After applying quality controls, stimulation of only 0.6% of OFC sites (2 sites, 2 patients) produced changes in subjective domain, while 99.4% had no reportable effects. Contrary to earlier studies, we found no evidence of valence lateralization or functional organization within the OFC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the electrical perturbation of OFC is largely silent and does not lead to reportable change in the subjective state of the individual.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Orbitofrontal cortex is a higher transmodal cortical area. The variability and limited replicability of reported effects from prior publications and the inconsistencies in the extant literature about OFC stimulations can be attributed to methodological shortcomings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prior findings on direct intracranial electrical stimulation (iES) of the human orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), which includes the orbital and ventromedial prefrontal regions, have been mixed, with several reports lacking replication. We aimed to clarify the effects of iES in the OFC.

Methods: We analyzed data from 608 stimulations across 277 OFC site pairs (352 sites total) in 49 patients collected over 17 years of our practice.

Results: We found 24.4% of sites as responsive to iES, with subjects reporting visual and olfactory sensations. However, post hoc analysis revealed that these responses largely originated from the stimulation of nearby non-OFC optic and olfactory structures. After applying quality controls, stimulation of only 0.6% of OFC sites (2 sites, 2 patients) produced changes in subjective domain, while 99.4% had no reportable effects. Contrary to earlier studies, we found no evidence of valence lateralization or functional organization within the OFC.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the electrical perturbation of OFC is largely silent and does not lead to reportable change in the subjective state of the individual.

Significance: Orbitofrontal cortex is a higher transmodal cortical area. The variability and limited replicability of reported effects from prior publications and the inconsistencies in the extant literature about OFC stimulations can be attributed to methodological shortcomings.

绘制颅内电刺激对人眶额皮质的影响。
导读:先前关于人类眶额皮质(OFC)的直接颅内电刺激(iES)的发现,包括眶和腹内侧前额叶区域,一直是混合的,有几个报告缺乏复制。我们的目的是澄清iES在OFC中的影响。方法:我们分析了17年来收集的49例患者277对OFC部位(总共352个部位)608次刺激的数据。结果:我们发现24.4%的部位对iES有反应,受试者报告有视觉和嗅觉感觉。然而,事后分析显示,这些反应主要源于附近非ofc的视觉和嗅觉结构的刺激。在应用质量控制后,只有0.6%的OFC部位(2个部位,2例患者)的刺激产生了主观领域的变化,而99.4%没有报告的影响。与早期的研究相反,我们没有发现OFC中存在价侧化或功能组织的证据。结论:我们的研究结果表明,OFC的电扰动在很大程度上是沉默的,不会导致个体主观状态的可报告变化。意义:眶额皮质是一个较高的跨峰皮质区。先前发表的报告效应的可变性和有限的可复制性,以及现有文献中关于OFC刺激的不一致,可归因于方法上的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信