Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Yong Won Cho, Won Chul Shin, Jung-Ick Byun, Jung-Won Shin, Ki-Young Jung
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Yong Won Cho, Won Chul Shin, Jung-Ick Byun, Jung-Won Shin, Ki-Young Jung","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2025.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in Korean adults with restless legs syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 78 patients with RLS with an International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 were randomized 1:1 to receive either pregabalin (<i>n</i>=39) or placebo (<i>n</i>=39) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the IRLS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and changes in scores on other RLS symptom questionnaires. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161027).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the mean IRLS scores were 23.2±5.8 in the pregabalin and 24.5±5.2 in the placebo group (<i>p</i>=0.297). After 12 weeks, the baseline-adjusted change in the IRLS score was -6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.3 to -4.3) in the pregabalin group and -5.4 (95% CI -7.9 to -2.8) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i>=0.420). The secondary efficacy outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of TEAE was similar between the two groups (48.7% vs. 51.3%, <i>p</i>=0.821), with dizziness being the most common TEAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study failed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of pregabalin compared with placebo for RLS in Korean adults. Possible reasons for the negative results include low dose, insufficient sample size, and substantial placebo response. Further investigations are warranted to optimize pregabalin therapy in Korean adults with RLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"21 4","pages":"325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2025.0092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in Korean adults with restless legs syndrome (RLS).
Methods: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 78 patients with RLS with an International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 were randomized 1:1 to receive either pregabalin (n=39) or placebo (n=39) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the IRLS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and changes in scores on other RLS symptom questionnaires. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161027).
Results: At baseline, the mean IRLS scores were 23.2±5.8 in the pregabalin and 24.5±5.2 in the placebo group (p=0.297). After 12 weeks, the baseline-adjusted change in the IRLS score was -6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.3 to -4.3) in the pregabalin group and -5.4 (95% CI -7.9 to -2.8) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (p=0.420). The secondary efficacy outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of TEAE was similar between the two groups (48.7% vs. 51.3%, p=0.821), with dizziness being the most common TEAE.
Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of pregabalin compared with placebo for RLS in Korean adults. Possible reasons for the negative results include low dose, insufficient sample size, and substantial placebo response. Further investigations are warranted to optimize pregabalin therapy in Korean adults with RLS.
期刊介绍:
The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.