Unveiling the superior analgesic: Thoracic epidural versus intrathecal morphine in open live donor hepatectomy - A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rohit Saini, Gaurav Sindwani, Neha Garg, Mahesh K Arora, Viniyendra Pamecha, Nihar Mohapatra
{"title":"Unveiling the superior analgesic: Thoracic epidural versus intrathecal morphine in open live donor hepatectomy - A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Rohit Saini, Gaurav Sindwani, Neha Garg, Mahesh K Arora, Viniyendra Pamecha, Nihar Mohapatra","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_173_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Postoperative pain management in open live donor hepatectomy is vital. This study aimed to compare postoperative analgesia provided by intrathecal morphine (ITM) and epidural in open live donor hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups. In the epidural (EPI) group, a bolus dose of 0.125% levobupivacaine (5-6 mL) with 3 mg of preservative-free morphine (diluted in 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline) was injected. In the postoperative period, infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at a rate of 5-8 mL/hour was continued for 3 days. In the intrathecal group (ITM), 0.3 mg morphine with 1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy was injected. General anesthesia was administered. Postoperatively, both groups received intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia. Numerical rating score (NRS) scores were recorded at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Data were analyzed using the Student <i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients were enrolled. The postoperative fentanyl consumption for the first 24 hours was significantly higher in the EPI group compared to the ITM group (162.5 mcg vs. 75 mcg, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.023). NRS up to 12 hours in the postoperative period at rest, on movement, and for shoulder pain were significantly lower in the ITM group compared to the EPI group (<i>P</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ITM significantly decreased fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours when compared to the epidural group in patients undergoing open donor hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 3","pages":"441-447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_173_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Postoperative pain management in open live donor hepatectomy is vital. This study aimed to compare postoperative analgesia provided by intrathecal morphine (ITM) and epidural in open live donor hepatectomy.

Material and methods: Patients were divided into two groups. In the epidural (EPI) group, a bolus dose of 0.125% levobupivacaine (5-6 mL) with 3 mg of preservative-free morphine (diluted in 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline) was injected. In the postoperative period, infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at a rate of 5-8 mL/hour was continued for 3 days. In the intrathecal group (ITM), 0.3 mg morphine with 1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy was injected. General anesthesia was administered. Postoperatively, both groups received intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia. Numerical rating score (NRS) scores were recorded at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Data were analyzed using the Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled. The postoperative fentanyl consumption for the first 24 hours was significantly higher in the EPI group compared to the ITM group (162.5 mcg vs. 75 mcg, respectively; P = 0.023). NRS up to 12 hours in the postoperative period at rest, on movement, and for shoulder pain were significantly lower in the ITM group compared to the EPI group (P = 0.000).

Conclusions: ITM significantly decreased fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours when compared to the epidural group in patients undergoing open donor hepatectomy.

揭示优越的镇痛:胸椎硬膜外吗啡与鞘内吗啡在开放式供肝切除术中的应用——一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:开放性供肝切除术术后疼痛管理至关重要。本研究旨在比较鞘内吗啡(ITM)和硬膜外吗啡在开放式供肝切除术中的术后镇痛效果。材料与方法:将患者分为两组。硬膜外(EPI)组注射0.125%左布比卡因(5-6 mL)和不含防腐剂的吗啡(用5 mL 0.9%生理盐水稀释)3 mg。术后持续输注0.125%左布比卡因,5- 8ml /h,持续3天。鞘内组(ITM)注射吗啡0.3 mg, 0.5%布比卡因1.5 mL。给予全身麻醉。术后两组均静脉注射芬太尼自控镇痛。分别于术后0、2、4、12、24、36、48、72小时记录数值评定评分(NRS)。数据分析采用学生t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Fisher精确检验。P < 0.05被认为是显著的。结果:共入组60例患者。与ITM组相比,EPI组术后前24小时的芬太尼消耗量显著高于ITM组(分别为162.5 mcg对75 mcg;P = 0.023)。与EPI组相比,ITM组术后休息、活动和肩部疼痛时长达12小时的NRS显著低于EPI组(P = 0.000)。结论:与硬膜外组相比,ITM在接受开放式供肝切除术的患者的前24小时内显着减少芬太尼的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信