Effect of Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal on lung aeration score after operative fixation of cervical spine: A prospective, double blinded, randomised control trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sumit R Chowdhury, Ashish Bindra, Gyaninder P Singh, Charu Mahajan, Maroof A Khan
{"title":"Effect of Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal on lung aeration score after operative fixation of cervical spine: A prospective, double blinded, randomised control trial.","authors":"Sumit R Chowdhury, Ashish Bindra, Gyaninder P Singh, Charu Mahajan, Maroof A Khan","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_513_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Traumatic cervical spine injury (tCSI) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (POPC) after surgical fixation. Sugammadex provides superior neuromuscular recovery; however, its effectiveness in reducing POPC in tCSI remains unclear. The primary outcome of this study was the ultrasonographic lung aeration score (LAS) at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included extubation success in the operation theatre, POPC, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for tracheostomy, hospital stay after surgery, and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective, double-blinded, randomised control trial, 75 patients undergoing elective fixation of tCSI were randomly allocated to either the neostigmine (N) group (<i>n</i> = 37) or sugammadex (S) group (n = 38) for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal. A <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in LAS at 24 hours between groups [median (range) LAS: 2 (0-18) in the N group, 2 (0-19) in the S group] (<i>P</i> = 0.632) or in any other secondary outcomes. The incidence of POPC was 27.03% in the N group and 26.32% in the S group (<i>P</i> = 0.944) Exploratory analysis did not find any difference in outcomes based on the level [high (C1-C4) vs. low (C5-C7)] or severity [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale: A, B vs. C, D, E] of spinal injury (<i>P</i> > 0.05). A LAS of 4 at 24 h predicted the development of POPC within 7 days with 80% sensitivity and 87.27% specificity (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve: 0.9032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In tCSI, NMB reversal using either sugammadex or neostigmine resulted in comparable LAS at 24 h postoperatively following cervical spine fixation. Additionally, a LAS of 4 was found to be a strong predictor of POPC within a 7-day follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 3","pages":"523-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_513_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Traumatic cervical spine injury (tCSI) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (POPC) after surgical fixation. Sugammadex provides superior neuromuscular recovery; however, its effectiveness in reducing POPC in tCSI remains unclear. The primary outcome of this study was the ultrasonographic lung aeration score (LAS) at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included extubation success in the operation theatre, POPC, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for tracheostomy, hospital stay after surgery, and in-hospital mortality.

Material and methods: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomised control trial, 75 patients undergoing elective fixation of tCSI were randomly allocated to either the neostigmine (N) group (n = 37) or sugammadex (S) group (n = 38) for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: There was no significant difference in LAS at 24 hours between groups [median (range) LAS: 2 (0-18) in the N group, 2 (0-19) in the S group] (P = 0.632) or in any other secondary outcomes. The incidence of POPC was 27.03% in the N group and 26.32% in the S group (P = 0.944) Exploratory analysis did not find any difference in outcomes based on the level [high (C1-C4) vs. low (C5-C7)] or severity [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale: A, B vs. C, D, E] of spinal injury (P > 0.05). A LAS of 4 at 24 h predicted the development of POPC within 7 days with 80% sensitivity and 87.27% specificity (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve: 0.9032).

Conclusion: In tCSI, NMB reversal using either sugammadex or neostigmine resulted in comparable LAS at 24 h postoperatively following cervical spine fixation. Additionally, a LAS of 4 was found to be a strong predictor of POPC within a 7-day follow-up period.

Sugammadex与新斯的明逆转对颈椎手术固定后肺通气评分的影响:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
背景和目的:外伤性颈椎损伤(tCSI)与手术固定后肺部并发症(POPC)的风险增加有关。Sugammadex提供优越的神经肌肉恢复;然而,其在减少tCSI中POPC的有效性仍不清楚。本研究的主要结果是术后24小时超声肺通气评分(LAS)。次要结局包括在手术室拔管成功、POPC、重症监护病房停留时间、机械通气持续时间、气管切开术需要、术后住院时间和院内死亡率。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验中,75名接受选择性固定tCSI的患者被随机分配到新斯的明(N = 37)组或糖马德(S)组(N = 38),以逆转神经肌肉阻断(NMB)。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:两组患者24小时的LAS[中位(范围):N组为2 (0-18),S组为2(0-19)]及其他次要结局无显著差异(P = 0.632)。N组POPC发生率为27.03%,S组为26.32% (P = 0.944)。探索性分析未发现脊髓损伤程度[高(C1-C4) vs低(C5-C7)]或严重程度[美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表:A、B vs C、D、E]的结局差异(P < 0.05)。24 h时的LAS为4,预测7天内POPC的发展,敏感性为80%,特异性为87.27%(受体操作者特征曲线下面积:0.9032)。结论:在tCSI中,在颈椎固定后24小时,使用糖马德或新斯的明进行NMB逆转可获得相当的LAS。此外,在7天的随访期间,发现LAS为4是POPC的一个强有力的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信