Application of Professional Best Practices in Postmortem Forensic Toxicology.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Michael T Truver, Chris W Chronister, Gregory G Davis, Teresa R Gray, Rebecca L Hartman, Joseph H Kahl, Erin L Karschner, Sarah Kerrigan, Robert Kronstrand, Alex J Krotulski, Dayong Lee, Barry K Logan, Diane M Moore, Luke N Rodda, Svante Vikingsson, Ruth E Winecker, Bruce A Goldberger
{"title":"Application of Professional Best Practices in Postmortem Forensic Toxicology.","authors":"Michael T Truver, Chris W Chronister, Gregory G Davis, Teresa R Gray, Rebecca L Hartman, Joseph H Kahl, Erin L Karschner, Sarah Kerrigan, Robert Kronstrand, Alex J Krotulski, Dayong Lee, Barry K Logan, Diane M Moore, Luke N Rodda, Svante Vikingsson, Ruth E Winecker, Bruce A Goldberger","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postmortem forensic toxicology plays a critical role in medicolegal death investigations through the identification and quantitation of drugs and other substances in postmortem fluids and tissues. Due to the complexity of this sub-discipline, consistent application of best practices is critical for ensuring accurate and reliable results, particularly in the context of challenges such as emerging novel psychoactive substances, complex poly-drug interactions, postmortem drug redistribution, and analytical limitations inherent with postmortem specimens. Although there has been significant progress in the development of consensus-based forensic toxicology standards, their scope is intentionally broad to accommodate human performance, postmortem, regulated and non-regulated employment drug testing, court-ordered toxicology, and other applications. Consequently, some aspects specific to postmortem toxicology and medicolegal death investigation are not addressed within the standards. This manuscript seeks to fill these gaps by demonstrating how current standards can be applied in a postmortem toxicology setting and presenting best practices in situations where no established standards exist. These best practices will aid laboratories in prioritizing changes to workflows, allocating resources more efficiently, improving analytical accuracy and reproducibility, ensuring interpretative consistency, and strengthening forensic defensibility in administrative and legal proceedings. Key topics addressed include specimen collection and case submission protocols, method validation approaches tailored for postmortem analysis, optimized analytical workflows based on testing scope and case classification, and quality assurance requirements. Considerations for data review, reporting, and result interpretation are discussed in the context of accurate determination of cause and manner of death. Emphasis is placed on integrating toxicological findings with investigative and autopsy information obtained through ongoing communication with stakeholders. By integrating the application of existing consensus standards with the best community practices for postmortem toxicology, this manuscript aims to support the generation of robust and reliable toxicological data, with the goal of improving forensic investigations, public health surveillance, and drug policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postmortem forensic toxicology plays a critical role in medicolegal death investigations through the identification and quantitation of drugs and other substances in postmortem fluids and tissues. Due to the complexity of this sub-discipline, consistent application of best practices is critical for ensuring accurate and reliable results, particularly in the context of challenges such as emerging novel psychoactive substances, complex poly-drug interactions, postmortem drug redistribution, and analytical limitations inherent with postmortem specimens. Although there has been significant progress in the development of consensus-based forensic toxicology standards, their scope is intentionally broad to accommodate human performance, postmortem, regulated and non-regulated employment drug testing, court-ordered toxicology, and other applications. Consequently, some aspects specific to postmortem toxicology and medicolegal death investigation are not addressed within the standards. This manuscript seeks to fill these gaps by demonstrating how current standards can be applied in a postmortem toxicology setting and presenting best practices in situations where no established standards exist. These best practices will aid laboratories in prioritizing changes to workflows, allocating resources more efficiently, improving analytical accuracy and reproducibility, ensuring interpretative consistency, and strengthening forensic defensibility in administrative and legal proceedings. Key topics addressed include specimen collection and case submission protocols, method validation approaches tailored for postmortem analysis, optimized analytical workflows based on testing scope and case classification, and quality assurance requirements. Considerations for data review, reporting, and result interpretation are discussed in the context of accurate determination of cause and manner of death. Emphasis is placed on integrating toxicological findings with investigative and autopsy information obtained through ongoing communication with stakeholders. By integrating the application of existing consensus standards with the best community practices for postmortem toxicology, this manuscript aims to support the generation of robust and reliable toxicological data, with the goal of improving forensic investigations, public health surveillance, and drug policy development.

在死后法医毒理学专业最佳实践的应用。
死后法医毒理学通过对死后液体和组织中的药物和其他物质进行鉴定和定量,在法医死亡调查中发挥着关键作用。由于这一分支学科的复杂性,始终如一地应用最佳实践对于确保准确可靠的结果至关重要,特别是在诸如新出现的新型精神活性物质、复杂的多药相互作用、死后药物再分配以及死后标本固有的分析局限性等挑战的背景下。虽然在制定基于共识的法医毒理学标准方面取得了重大进展,但其范围有意扩大,以适应人体行为、死后、受管制和不受管制的就业药物测试、法院命令的毒理学和其他应用。因此,一些具体到死后毒理学和法医死亡调查方面的问题在标准中没有得到解决。本手稿旨在填补这些空白,通过展示如何现行标准可以应用于死后毒理学设置,并提出在没有既定标准存在的情况下的最佳做法。这些最佳做法将有助于实验室优先改变工作流程,更有效地分配资源,提高分析的准确性和可重复性,确保解释的一致性,并加强行政和法律诉讼中的法医辩护能力。讨论的关键主题包括标本收集和病例提交协议,针对死后分析量身定制的方法验证方法,基于测试范围和病例分类的优化分析工作流程,以及质量保证要求。在准确确定死因和死亡方式的背景下,对数据审查、报告和结果解释的考虑进行了讨论。重点放在将毒理学发现与通过与利益相关者的持续沟通获得的调查和尸检信息相结合。通过整合现有共识标准与最佳社区尸检毒理学实践的应用,本文旨在支持生成稳健可靠的毒理学数据,以改善法医调查、公共卫生监督和药物政策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信