Alejandro Pagan-Conesa, Carlos Verdu-Aznar, Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, Flores Vizcaya-Moreno
{"title":"Influence of supraspinatus retraction size on functional outcome after arthroscopic direct repair.","authors":"Alejandro Pagan-Conesa, Carlos Verdu-Aznar, Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, Flores Vizcaya-Moreno","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06606-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective was to assess whether the size of the supraspinatus tendon retraction following a degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tear influenced the functional outcome after arthroscopic direct repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective comparative cohort study of 65 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a follow-up of 24 months. The mean age was 60.0 years (SD, 9.2). According to the supraspinatus tendon retraction, patients were included into the shorter retraction group (≤ 20 mm; n = 32) and longer retraction group (> 20 mm; n = 33). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant-Murley score and visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperatively, both groups significantly improved functional and pain outcomes, with no significant differences at the final follow-up (p = 0.671). The mean time interval between the onset of patient-reported symptoms and surgery was not significantly correlated with the retraction size (r = 0.12, p = 0.066). The multivariate analysis did not show significant predictors of satisfactory functional outcome, especially the tendon retraction size (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.9-1.1; p = 0.728).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In degenerative tears, the size of the supraspinatus tendon retraction was not correlated with the duration of the symptoms. The tendon retraction of up to 4 cm did not influence the functional outcome at 24 postoperative months, regardless of the arthroscopic repair technique of one or two rows.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"2139-2144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06606-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The objective was to assess whether the size of the supraspinatus tendon retraction following a degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tear influenced the functional outcome after arthroscopic direct repair.
Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study of 65 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a follow-up of 24 months. The mean age was 60.0 years (SD, 9.2). According to the supraspinatus tendon retraction, patients were included into the shorter retraction group (≤ 20 mm; n = 32) and longer retraction group (> 20 mm; n = 33). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant-Murley score and visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Results: Postoperatively, both groups significantly improved functional and pain outcomes, with no significant differences at the final follow-up (p = 0.671). The mean time interval between the onset of patient-reported symptoms and surgery was not significantly correlated with the retraction size (r = 0.12, p = 0.066). The multivariate analysis did not show significant predictors of satisfactory functional outcome, especially the tendon retraction size (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.9-1.1; p = 0.728).
Conclusion: In degenerative tears, the size of the supraspinatus tendon retraction was not correlated with the duration of the symptoms. The tendon retraction of up to 4 cm did not influence the functional outcome at 24 postoperative months, regardless of the arthroscopic repair technique of one or two rows.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.