{"title":"Matrix Radiofrequency Combined with Myofascial Manipulation in the Treatment of Myofascial Pelvic Pain: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Hongyan Wang, Wenying Wang, Fangfang Xue","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06202-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study is aimed at evaluating the clinical efficacy of matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation in the treatment of myofascial pelvic pain (MPP) and to assess its effects on pain relief and pelvic floor muscle function improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 87 MPP patients treated at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2024. According to their treatment modalities, patients were divided into the observation group (matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation) and the control group (myofascial manipulation alone). Pain levels and pelvic floor muscle function were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and pelvic floor surface electromyography by Glazer evaluation before and after treatment in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the treatment course, the VAS scores significantly decreased in both groups. However, the post-treatment VAS score in the observation group (1.21 ± 0.95) was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.76 ± 0.80), with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). The Glazer evaluation of pelvic floor muscles showed that the improvements in fast-twitch contraction, tonic contraction, and endurance contraction in the observation group were significantly greater than those in the control group (p < 0.001), and the reduction in resting electromyographic amplitude was also more pronounced. Moreover, the overall effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation is significantly more effective than myofascial manipulation alone in alleviating pain and improving pelvic floor muscle function in patients with MPP. This combination therapy provides a safe and effective treatment option, which can significantly improve the clinical efficacy of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06202-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: This study is aimed at evaluating the clinical efficacy of matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation in the treatment of myofascial pelvic pain (MPP) and to assess its effects on pain relief and pelvic floor muscle function improvement.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 87 MPP patients treated at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2024. According to their treatment modalities, patients were divided into the observation group (matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation) and the control group (myofascial manipulation alone). Pain levels and pelvic floor muscle function were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and pelvic floor surface electromyography by Glazer evaluation before and after treatment in both groups.
Results: After the treatment course, the VAS scores significantly decreased in both groups. However, the post-treatment VAS score in the observation group (1.21 ± 0.95) was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.76 ± 0.80), with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). The Glazer evaluation of pelvic floor muscles showed that the improvements in fast-twitch contraction, tonic contraction, and endurance contraction in the observation group were significantly greater than those in the control group (p < 0.001), and the reduction in resting electromyographic amplitude was also more pronounced. Moreover, the overall effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation is significantly more effective than myofascial manipulation alone in alleviating pain and improving pelvic floor muscle function in patients with MPP. This combination therapy provides a safe and effective treatment option, which can significantly improve the clinical efficacy of patients.
期刊介绍：
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
