Development and Validation of Preoperative Ultrasound-Based Risk Scoring Systems for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jieyi Ping, Hailing Zha, Baoding Chen, Jun Gu, Liwen Du, Mengjun Cai, Minjia Lin, Xiaoan Liu, Hui Wang, Cuiying Li
{"title":"Development and Validation of Preoperative Ultrasound-Based Risk Scoring Systems for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.","authors":"Jieyi Ping, Hailing Zha, Baoding Chen, Jun Gu, Liwen Du, Mengjun Cai, Minjia Lin, Xiaoan Liu, Hui Wang, Cuiying Li","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate 2 preoperative ultrasound (US)-based risk-scoring systems to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. > 2) in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multicenter retrospective study included 1194 women with breast cancer from 3 institutions. Institutions 1 and 2 were used for training (n = 643) and testing (n = 275), while 276 patients from Institution 3 served as the validation set. Multivariate logistic regression was used to construct 2 risk-scoring systems based on US features. Predictive performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk-scoring system for ALN metastasis (presence vs. absence), based on the longest diameter and margin of the mass, mass pathology, long-to-short axis ratio of the ALN, cortical morphological features, and blood flow type of the ALN, achieved AUCs of 0.86, 0.81, and 0.84 in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. The risk-scoring system for predicting the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. >2), based on US (the longest diameter and the number of suspicious ALNs on US), achieved AUCs of 0.78, 0.75, and 0.78 in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. Calibration plots showed good model calibration, and decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of both models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2 preoperative US-based risk-scoring systems effectively predicted ALN metastasis and the number of metastatic ALNs, aiding clinicians in assessing the risk of ALN involvement in breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.06.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate 2 preoperative ultrasound (US)-based risk-scoring systems to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. > 2) in patients with breast cancer.

Method: A multicenter retrospective study included 1194 women with breast cancer from 3 institutions. Institutions 1 and 2 were used for training (n = 643) and testing (n = 275), while 276 patients from Institution 3 served as the validation set. Multivariate logistic regression was used to construct 2 risk-scoring systems based on US features. Predictive performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.

Results: The risk-scoring system for ALN metastasis (presence vs. absence), based on the longest diameter and margin of the mass, mass pathology, long-to-short axis ratio of the ALN, cortical morphological features, and blood flow type of the ALN, achieved AUCs of 0.86, 0.81, and 0.84 in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. The risk-scoring system for predicting the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. >2), based on US (the longest diameter and the number of suspicious ALNs on US), achieved AUCs of 0.78, 0.75, and 0.78 in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. Calibration plots showed good model calibration, and decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of both models.

Conclusion: The 2 preoperative US-based risk-scoring systems effectively predicted ALN metastasis and the number of metastatic ALNs, aiding clinicians in assessing the risk of ALN involvement in breast cancer patients.

基于超声预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的术前风险评分系统的开发和验证:一项多中心回顾性研究。
目的:本研究旨在建立和验证2个基于术前超声(US)的风险评分系统,以预测乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结(ALN)转移和转移ALN的数量(≤2 vs. > 2)。方法:对来自3所医院的1194例乳腺癌患者进行多中心回顾性研究。机构1和机构2用于培训(n = 643)和测试(n = 275),机构3的276例患者作为验证集。采用多元逻辑回归构建了2个基于US特征的风险评分系统。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准图和决策曲线分析来评估预测性能。结果:基于肿块的最长直径和边缘、肿块病理、ALN的长短轴比、皮质形态特征和ALN的血流类型,ALN转移(存在与否)的风险评分系统在训练集、测试集和验证集的auc分别为0.86、0.81和0.84。基于US (US上最长直径和可疑aln的数量)预测转移性aln数量的风险评分系统(≤2 vs. >2),在训练集、测试集和验证集的auc分别为0.78、0.75和0.78。校正图显示模型校正良好,决策曲线分析证实了两种模型的临床实用性。结论:两种基于术前的风险评分系统可有效预测ALN转移及转移性ALN的数量,有助于临床医生评估乳腺癌患者ALN累及的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信