Development of an explainable machine learning model for predicting device-related pressure injuries in clinical settings.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Yijie Qian, Hongying Pan, Jun Chen, Hongyang Hu, Mei Fang, Chen Huang, Yihong Xu, Yang Gao
{"title":"Development of an explainable machine learning model for predicting device-related pressure injuries in clinical settings.","authors":"Yijie Qian, Hongying Pan, Jun Chen, Hongyang Hu, Mei Fang, Chen Huang, Yihong Xu, Yang Gao","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03090-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Device-related pressure injury (DRPI) is a prevalent and severe problem for patients using medical devices. Timely identification of patients at high risk of DRPI is crucial for healthcare providers to make informed decisions and prevent DRPI quickly. Given the rapid advancements in computer technology, we aimed to develop an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting DRPI, utilizing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to enhance the model's transparency and provide insights into feature importance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 675 study subjects (225 in the DRPI group and 450 in the non-DRPI group) from a single medical center between January 2019 and December 2020. Python was used to perform classification models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and K-Nearest neighbors (KNN). We evaluated the performance of the six models using area under the ROC curve (AUC), specificity, accuracy, and sensitivity, with the dataset split into a 80% training set and a 20% testing set. We utilized several analyses, such as SHAP and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), to explore the potential contribution of different characteristics in our risk prediction models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test set, XGBoost model outperformed the other models (AUC = 0.964). The interpretation of the model using SHAPscores revealed that the length of stay, instrument type, emergency admissions, instrument material, and instrument duration of use are the top five most important features in predicting DRPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that the development of DRPI in patients can be accurately predicted using the machine learning (ML) model. The findings not only provide clinical caregivers with a valuable framework to identify patients at high risk of DRPI, but also lay the groundwork for developing targeted preventive strategies and personalized interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03090-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Device-related pressure injury (DRPI) is a prevalent and severe problem for patients using medical devices. Timely identification of patients at high risk of DRPI is crucial for healthcare providers to make informed decisions and prevent DRPI quickly. Given the rapid advancements in computer technology, we aimed to develop an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting DRPI, utilizing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to enhance the model's transparency and provide insights into feature importance.

Methods: We enrolled 675 study subjects (225 in the DRPI group and 450 in the non-DRPI group) from a single medical center between January 2019 and December 2020. Python was used to perform classification models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and K-Nearest neighbors (KNN). We evaluated the performance of the six models using area under the ROC curve (AUC), specificity, accuracy, and sensitivity, with the dataset split into a 80% training set and a 20% testing set. We utilized several analyses, such as SHAP and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), to explore the potential contribution of different characteristics in our risk prediction models.

Results: In the test set, XGBoost model outperformed the other models (AUC = 0.964). The interpretation of the model using SHAPscores revealed that the length of stay, instrument type, emergency admissions, instrument material, and instrument duration of use are the top five most important features in predicting DRPI.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the development of DRPI in patients can be accurately predicted using the machine learning (ML) model. The findings not only provide clinical caregivers with a valuable framework to identify patients at high risk of DRPI, but also lay the groundwork for developing targeted preventive strategies and personalized interventions.

开发一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测临床环境中与设备相关的压力损伤。
背景:器械相关压力损伤(DRPI)是使用医疗器械患者普遍存在的严重问题。及时识别DRPI高风险患者对于医疗保健提供者做出明智决策和快速预防DRPI至关重要。鉴于计算机技术的快速发展,我们的目标是开发一个可解释的人工智能(AI)模型来预测DRPI,利用SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)来提高模型的透明度并提供对特征重要性的见解。方法:我们在2019年1月至2020年12月期间从一个医疗中心招募了675名研究对象(225名DRPI组和450名非DRPI组)。使用Python执行分类模型,包括极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)、逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)和k -最近邻(KNN)。我们使用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、特异性、准确性和灵敏度来评估这六个模型的性能,数据集分为80%的训练集和20%的测试集。我们使用了几种分析,如SHAP和均匀流形逼近和投影(UMAP),来探索不同特征在我们的风险预测模型中的潜在贡献。结果:在测试集中,XGBoost模型优于其他模型(AUC = 0.964)。使用SHAPscores对模型的解释显示,住院时间、仪器类型、急诊入院、仪器材料和仪器使用时间是预测DRPI的前五个最重要的特征。结论:我们的研究表明,使用机器学习(ML)模型可以准确预测患者DRPI的发展。研究结果不仅为临床护理人员识别DRPI高风险患者提供了有价值的框架,而且为制定有针对性的预防策略和个性化干预措施奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信