Proposing a precision-enhancing method for sagittal plane alignment during total knee arthroplasty.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jisu Park, Hyeongyu Lim, Chong Bum Chang
{"title":"Proposing a precision-enhancing method for sagittal plane alignment during total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Jisu Park, Hyeongyu Lim, Chong Bum Chang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08912-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving appropriate alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for long-term survival of implant but alignment in sagittal plane is relatively not well studied. The purpose of this study was to (1) propose the preoperative sagittal planning method of TKA using X-ray, (2) validate its accuracy and (3) find factors contributing to inaccurate sagittal placement of the component.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three knees of 71 patients were prospectively reviewed. Preoperative sagittal planning for the femoral and tibial component was conducted using simple X-ray images. The postoperative X-ray taken six weeks after surgery was used to validate the proposed method. The angle between the reference line and the expected resection line before surgery was defined as the preoperative gamma angle for the femur and delta angle for the tibia. Postoperatively, the angle between the same reference line and the actual component was defined as the postoperative gamma and delta angles, respectively. The target angle range for the difference between the preoperative and postoperative gamma and delta angles was set as -2° to 2°. Demographic and radiologic factors between groups that fell within and outside the target angle range were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 75 cases (80.6%) met the target angle range of distal femur resection. Femoral component tended to be placed in more flexed position than planned. Anterior femoral notching was not observed in all cases. Total 89 cases (95.7%) met the target angle range of proximal tibia resection. No factors were associated with the increased difference in preoperative and postoperative femoral and tibial prosthesis placement in multiple regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed sagittal planning method for TKA demonstrated an accuracy of 80.6% for the femoral component and 95.7% for the tibial component. Since this method does not require any programs and additional costs, it could be a good alternative in situations where robotic-assisted TKA is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08912-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achieving appropriate alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for long-term survival of implant but alignment in sagittal plane is relatively not well studied. The purpose of this study was to (1) propose the preoperative sagittal planning method of TKA using X-ray, (2) validate its accuracy and (3) find factors contributing to inaccurate sagittal placement of the component.

Methods: Ninety-three knees of 71 patients were prospectively reviewed. Preoperative sagittal planning for the femoral and tibial component was conducted using simple X-ray images. The postoperative X-ray taken six weeks after surgery was used to validate the proposed method. The angle between the reference line and the expected resection line before surgery was defined as the preoperative gamma angle for the femur and delta angle for the tibia. Postoperatively, the angle between the same reference line and the actual component was defined as the postoperative gamma and delta angles, respectively. The target angle range for the difference between the preoperative and postoperative gamma and delta angles was set as -2° to 2°. Demographic and radiologic factors between groups that fell within and outside the target angle range were compared.

Results: Total 75 cases (80.6%) met the target angle range of distal femur resection. Femoral component tended to be placed in more flexed position than planned. Anterior femoral notching was not observed in all cases. Total 89 cases (95.7%) met the target angle range of proximal tibia resection. No factors were associated with the increased difference in preoperative and postoperative femoral and tibial prosthesis placement in multiple regression.

Conclusions: The proposed sagittal planning method for TKA demonstrated an accuracy of 80.6% for the femoral component and 95.7% for the tibial component. Since this method does not require any programs and additional costs, it could be a good alternative in situations where robotic-assisted TKA is not available.

提出一种提高全膝关节置换术中矢状面对齐精度的方法。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后获得适当的对齐对于假体的长期存活至关重要,但矢状面对齐的研究相对较少。本研究的目的是:(1)提出TKA术前x线矢状面规划方法,(2)验证其准确性,(3)找到导致组件矢状面放置不准确的因素。方法:对71例患者93个膝关节进行前瞻性分析。术前矢状面规划股骨和胫骨部分使用简单的x线图像。术后6周的x光片用于验证所提出的方法。术前参考线与预期切除线之间的夹角定义为股骨的术前gamma角和胫骨的术前delta角。术后,同一参考线与实际组件之间的夹角分别定义为术后gamma角和delta角。术前和术后gamma角和delta角差的目标角度范围设为-2°至2°。在目标角度范围内和之外的组之间进行人口统计学和放射学因素的比较。结果:75例(80.6%)达到股骨远端切除目标角度范围。股骨假体倾向于放置在比计划更弯曲的位置。所有病例均未见股前切迹。89例(95.7%)达到胫骨近端切除目标角度范围。在多元回归中,术前和术后股骨和胫骨假体放置的差异没有增加的相关因素。结论:提出的矢状面TKA规划方法对股骨假体的准确率为80.6%,对胫骨假体的准确率为95.7%。由于该方法不需要任何程序和额外费用,因此在无法使用机器人辅助TKA的情况下,它可能是一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信