Cross-omics risk scores of inflammation markers are associated with all-cause mortality: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Anat Yaskolka Meir, Huan Yun, Jie Hu, Jun Li, Jiaxuan Liu, Alaina Bever, Andrew Ratanatharathorn, Mingyang Song, A Heather Eliassen, Lori Chibnik, Karestan Koenen, Guillaume Pare, Meir J Stampfer, Liming Liang
{"title":"Cross-omics risk scores of inflammation markers are associated with all-cause mortality: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.","authors":"Anat Yaskolka Meir, Huan Yun, Jie Hu, Jun Li, Jiaxuan Liu, Alaina Bever, Andrew Ratanatharathorn, Mingyang Song, A Heather Eliassen, Lori Chibnik, Karestan Koenen, Guillaume Pare, Meir J Stampfer, Liming Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammation is a critical component of chronic diseases, aging progression, and lifespan. Omics signatures may characterize inflammation status beyond blood biomarkers. We leveraged genetics (polygenic risk score [PRS]), metabolomics (metabolomic risk score [MRS]), and epigenetics (epigenetic risk score [ERS]) to build multi-omics-multi-marker risk scores for inflammation status represented by the level of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). We found that multi-omics risk scores generally outperformed single-omics risk scores in predicting all-cause mortality in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Compared with circulating inflammation biomarkers, some multi-omics risk scores had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality when including both score and circulating IL-6 in the same model (1-SD IL-6 MRS-ERS: HR = 2.20 [1.55-3.13] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6 HR = 0.94 [0.67,1.32]. 1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS: HR = 1.47 [1.35,1.59] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6 HR = 1.33 [1.18, 1.51]. 1-SD PRS-MRS-ERS: HR = 1.95 [1.40, 2.70] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6: HR = 0.99 [0.71, 1.39]). In the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHS II, and Health Professional Follow-up Study with available omics, 1 SD of IL-6 PRS and 1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS had HR = 1.12 [1.00,1.26] and HR = 1.13 [1.01,1.26] among individuals >65 years old without mutual adjustment of the score and circulating IL-6. Our study demonstrates that some multi-omics scores for inflammation markers may characterize important inflammation burden for an individual beyond those represented by blood biomarkers and improve our prediction capability for the aging process and lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.06.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflammation is a critical component of chronic diseases, aging progression, and lifespan. Omics signatures may characterize inflammation status beyond blood biomarkers. We leveraged genetics (polygenic risk score [PRS]), metabolomics (metabolomic risk score [MRS]), and epigenetics (epigenetic risk score [ERS]) to build multi-omics-multi-marker risk scores for inflammation status represented by the level of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). We found that multi-omics risk scores generally outperformed single-omics risk scores in predicting all-cause mortality in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Compared with circulating inflammation biomarkers, some multi-omics risk scores had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality when including both score and circulating IL-6 in the same model (1-SD IL-6 MRS-ERS: HR = 2.20 [1.55-3.13] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6 HR = 0.94 [0.67,1.32]. 1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS: HR = 1.47 [1.35,1.59] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6 HR = 1.33 [1.18, 1.51]. 1-SD PRS-MRS-ERS: HR = 1.95 [1.40, 2.70] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6: HR = 0.99 [0.71, 1.39]). In the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHS II, and Health Professional Follow-up Study with available omics, 1 SD of IL-6 PRS and 1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS had HR = 1.12 [1.00,1.26] and HR = 1.13 [1.01,1.26] among individuals >65 years old without mutual adjustment of the score and circulating IL-6. Our study demonstrates that some multi-omics scores for inflammation markers may characterize important inflammation burden for an individual beyond those represented by blood biomarkers and improve our prediction capability for the aging process and lifespan.

炎症标志物的交叉组学风险评分与全因死亡率相关:加拿大老龄化纵向研究。
炎症是慢性疾病、衰老进程和寿命的重要组成部分。组学特征可以表征血液生物标志物之外的炎症状态。我们利用遗传学(多基因风险评分[PRS])、代谢组学(代谢组学风险评分[MRS])和表观遗传学(表观遗传风险评分[ERS])建立多组学-多标记风险评分,以循环c -反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素6 (IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α)水平为代表炎症状态。我们发现,在加拿大老龄化纵向研究中,多组学风险评分在预测全因死亡率方面普遍优于单组学风险评分。与循环炎症生物标志物相比,当在同一模型中同时包含评分和循环IL-6时,一些多组学风险评分的全因死亡率风险比(HR)更高(1-SD IL-6 MRS-ERS: HR = 2.20 [1.55-3.13], 1-SD循环IL-6 HR = 0.94[0.67,1.32])。1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS: HR = 1.47 [1.35,1.59] vs. 1-SD循环IL-6 HR = 1.33[1.18, 1.51]。1-SD PRS-MRS-ERS: HR = 1.95[1.40, 2.70]与1-SD循环IL-6: HR = 0.99[0.71, 1.39])。在护士健康研究(NHS)、NHS II和有组学可用的卫生专业随访研究中,在0 ~ 65岁的个体中,IL-6 PRS和1-SD IL-6 PRS- mrs的HR = 1.12[1.00,1.26]和HR = 1.13[1.01,1.26],且不相互调整评分和循环IL-6。我们的研究表明,炎症标志物的一些多组学评分可以表征个体的重要炎症负担,而不仅仅是血液生物标志物,并提高我们对衰老过程和寿命的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信