A Comparison of Severe Maternal Morbidity After Pre- and Periviable Premature Prelabor Rupture of Membranes in Multiple Gestations: Expectant Management versus Pregnancy Termination.

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS
AJP Reports Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2644-0279
Courtney T Connolly, Siwei Xie, Ethan Gough, Marika A Toscano
{"title":"A Comparison of Severe Maternal Morbidity After Pre- and Periviable Premature Prelabor Rupture of Membranes in Multiple Gestations: Expectant Management versus Pregnancy Termination.","authors":"Courtney T Connolly, Siwei Xie, Ethan Gough, Marika A Toscano","doi":"10.1055/a-2644-0279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality after pre- or periviable prelabor rupture of membranes (pPPROM) in multiple gestation pregnancies among individuals choosing expectant management (EM) or termination of pregnancy (TOP).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of multiple gestations with pPPROM between 14 <sup>0/7</sup> and 23 <sup>6/7</sup> at five hospitals within a large health system from 2011 to 2024. The primary outcome was SMM by the Centers for Disease Control (CDCs), 21 indicators compared between the two cohorts. Continuous outcomes were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical outcomes. Data was analyzed using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five twin and 1 triplet gestations were included ( <i>n</i>  = 37 EM, <i>n</i>  = 9 TOP). There were no differences in gestational age at PPROM, age, race, and history of PPROM. There were no maternal deaths and no differences in chorioamnionitis, sepsis, ICU admission, blood loss, or hospital readmission. Seventy point three percent of patients undergoing EM experienced some form of maternal morbidity, and 27.0% experienced at least one CDC SMM indicator, but this was not different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in four individuals with multiple gestations undergoing EM of pPPROM experienced at least one adverse maternal outcome by CDC criteria. There were no significant differences identified between EM and TOP, likely due to the study's limited size.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>More than 70% of multiples with pPPROM electing EM experienced an adverse maternal outcome.There was no difference in maternal morbidity detected between EM and termination.One in four multiples with pPPROM electing EM had a severe adverse maternal outcome.Given disparities in access to termination, understanding maternal risks of pPPROM is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":"e106-e112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2644-0279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality after pre- or periviable prelabor rupture of membranes (pPPROM) in multiple gestation pregnancies among individuals choosing expectant management (EM) or termination of pregnancy (TOP).

Study design: A retrospective cohort study of multiple gestations with pPPROM between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 at five hospitals within a large health system from 2011 to 2024. The primary outcome was SMM by the Centers for Disease Control (CDCs), 21 indicators compared between the two cohorts. Continuous outcomes were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical outcomes. Data was analyzed using R.

Results: Forty-five twin and 1 triplet gestations were included ( n  = 37 EM, n  = 9 TOP). There were no differences in gestational age at PPROM, age, race, and history of PPROM. There were no maternal deaths and no differences in chorioamnionitis, sepsis, ICU admission, blood loss, or hospital readmission. Seventy point three percent of patients undergoing EM experienced some form of maternal morbidity, and 27.0% experienced at least one CDC SMM indicator, but this was not different between groups.

Conclusion: One in four individuals with multiple gestations undergoing EM of pPPROM experienced at least one adverse maternal outcome by CDC criteria. There were no significant differences identified between EM and TOP, likely due to the study's limited size.

Key points: More than 70% of multiples with pPPROM electing EM experienced an adverse maternal outcome.There was no difference in maternal morbidity detected between EM and termination.One in four multiples with pPPROM electing EM had a severe adverse maternal outcome.Given disparities in access to termination, understanding maternal risks of pPPROM is critical.

多胎妊娠前和围生期早产、产前胎膜破裂后严重产妇发病率的比较:保守处理与终止妊娠。
目的:比较选择保守治疗(EM)或终止妊娠(TOP)的多胎妊娠患者在分娩前或围生期胎膜破裂(pPPROM)后的严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)和死亡率。研究设计:一项回顾性队列研究,对2011年至2024年在大型卫生系统内的五家医院进行的pPPROM 14 0/7至23 6/7之间的多胎妊娠进行研究。主要结果是疾病控制中心(cdc)的SMM,两个队列之间比较了21个指标。用Mann-Whitney U检验比较连续结果。分类结果采用卡方/费雪精确检验。结果:纳入45例双胎和1例三胞胎妊娠(n = 37 EM, n = 9 TOP)。PPROM的胎龄、年龄、种族和PPROM病史均无差异。没有产妇死亡,在绒毛膜羊膜炎、败血症、ICU入院、失血或再入院方面也没有差异。73%的EM患者经历了某种形式的产妇发病率,27.0%经历了至少一项CDC SMM指标,但这在两组之间没有差异。结论:四分之一的多胎患者接受pPPROM的EM至少经历了一次CDC标准的不良产妇结局。EM和TOP之间没有发现显著差异,可能是由于研究规模有限。重点:超过70%的pPPROM选择EM的多胎经历了不良的产妇结局。妊娠和终止妊娠的产妇发病率无差异。pPPROM选择EM的四分之一的多胞胎有严重的不良产妇结局。鉴于获得终止妊娠的机会存在差异,了解pPPROM的产妇风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJP Reports
AJP Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信