A comparative analysis of the significance of depth of invasion and tumor thickness in the staging of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Maria Faraz, Neharika Shrestha, Syed M Gilani
{"title":"A comparative analysis of the significance of depth of invasion and tumor thickness in the staging of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Maria Faraz, Neharika Shrestha, Syed M Gilani","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition, tumor depth of invasion is one of the essential parameters required for the staging of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We conducted this study to overview our diagnostic challenges and share our institutional experiences related to the measurement of depth of invasion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 90 OSCC cases between 2017 and 2023. The depth of invasion and tumor thickness were remeasured in each case, and the tumor stage was assigned according to the AJCC 8th edition criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 84 of 90 (93.3%) had the same tumor stage, whether defined by tumor thickness or depth of invasion. Overall, the difference between tumor thickness and depth of invasion ranged from 0 to 3 mm. In only 6 of the 90 (6.7%) cases was the tumor stage changed based on tumor thickness. Of these 6 cases, 4 were upgraded from T1 to T2, while the remaining 2 were upgraded from T2 to T3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed that in 93.3% of our OSCC cases, tumor stage remained the same with either depth of invasion or tumor thickness, while 6.7% were upstaged based on tumor thickness. Based on the study observations, tumor thickness appears to be more straightforward to measure than depth of invasion. In contrast, depth of invasion measurement requires certain prerequisites and can pose diagnostic challenges. Additional studies with larger cohorts are needed to compare tumor thickness with depth of invasion findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":"409-414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition, tumor depth of invasion is one of the essential parameters required for the staging of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We conducted this study to overview our diagnostic challenges and share our institutional experiences related to the measurement of depth of invasion.

Methods: We selected 90 OSCC cases between 2017 and 2023. The depth of invasion and tumor thickness were remeasured in each case, and the tumor stage was assigned according to the AJCC 8th edition criteria.

Results: We found that 84 of 90 (93.3%) had the same tumor stage, whether defined by tumor thickness or depth of invasion. Overall, the difference between tumor thickness and depth of invasion ranged from 0 to 3 mm. In only 6 of the 90 (6.7%) cases was the tumor stage changed based on tumor thickness. Of these 6 cases, 4 were upgraded from T1 to T2, while the remaining 2 were upgraded from T2 to T3.

Conclusions: We observed that in 93.3% of our OSCC cases, tumor stage remained the same with either depth of invasion or tumor thickness, while 6.7% were upstaged based on tumor thickness. Based on the study observations, tumor thickness appears to be more straightforward to measure than depth of invasion. In contrast, depth of invasion measurement requires certain prerequisites and can pose diagnostic challenges. Additional studies with larger cohorts are needed to compare tumor thickness with depth of invasion findings.

侵袭深度与肿瘤厚度在口腔鳞状细胞癌分期中的比较分析。
目的:根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版,肿瘤浸润深度是口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)分期的重要参数之一。我们进行这项研究是为了概述我们在诊断方面面临的挑战,并分享我们在测量侵入深度方面的机构经验。方法:选取2017 - 2023年间的90例OSCC病例。每例患者重新测量浸润深度和肿瘤厚度,并根据AJCC第8版标准划分肿瘤分期。结果:90例中有84例(93.3%)的肿瘤分期相同,无论以肿瘤厚度还是浸润深度来定义。总体而言,肿瘤厚度和浸润深度的差异在0 - 3mm之间。90例中仅有6例(6.7%)根据肿瘤厚度改变肿瘤分期。6例中,4例由T1升级至T2, 2例由T2升级至T3。结论:我们观察到93.3%的OSCC病例的肿瘤分期与浸润深度或肿瘤厚度相同,而6.7%的病例因肿瘤厚度而提前。根据研究观察,肿瘤厚度似乎比浸润深度更容易测量。相比之下,入侵深度测量需要一定的先决条件,可能会给诊断带来挑战。需要更多的研究来比较肿瘤的厚度和浸润的深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信