Universal adhesive application and curing mode affect shear bond strength and shear fatigue bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Toshiki Takamizawa, Mark A Latta, Wayne W Barkmeier, Ryo Ishii, Sho Shibasaki, Yuta Kasahara, Soshi Suzuki, Masashi Miyazaki
{"title":"Universal adhesive application and curing mode affect shear bond strength and shear fatigue bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin.","authors":"Toshiki Takamizawa, Mark A Latta, Wayne W Barkmeier, Ryo Ishii, Sho Shibasaki, Yuta Kasahara, Soshi Suzuki, Masashi Miyazaki","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the shear bond strength (SBS) and shear fatigue bond strength (SFS) of self-adhesive resin luting cements (RLCs) to dentin with or without universal adhesive application in different curing modes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two self-adhesive RLCs (BeautiLink SA and RelyX Universal Resin Cement) were used with or without universal adhesive application. A conventional RLC system (Panavia V5) was used for comparative analysis. Thirty-six specimens were used for each test group: 12 for the SBS and 24 for the SFS tests. Stainless steel rods were bonded to human dentin with and without the light curing of RLC paste. For the SBS test, the bonded specimens were loaded to failure. For the SFS test, repeated subcritical load was applied to the specimens. The flexural strength of the RLCs in different curing modes were also determined. Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test, was used for SBS, and a modified t-test with Bonferroni correction was used for SFS (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SFS results showed a similar trend to the SBS results. The self-adhesive RLCs alone showed significantly lower SFS values in the self-cure mode than in the dual-cure mode. The dual-cure mode triggered higher flexural strength than the self-cure mode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The universal adhesive combined self-adhesive RLCs showed significantly higher bond effectiveness than self-adhesive RLCs alone.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The self-adhesive RLCs combined with universal adhesive may enhance interlocking and chemical bonding. However, light irradiation of the RLC paste remains essential to ensure optimal bonding effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2025.07.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the shear bond strength (SBS) and shear fatigue bond strength (SFS) of self-adhesive resin luting cements (RLCs) to dentin with or without universal adhesive application in different curing modes.

Methods: Two self-adhesive RLCs (BeautiLink SA and RelyX Universal Resin Cement) were used with or without universal adhesive application. A conventional RLC system (Panavia V5) was used for comparative analysis. Thirty-six specimens were used for each test group: 12 for the SBS and 24 for the SFS tests. Stainless steel rods were bonded to human dentin with and without the light curing of RLC paste. For the SBS test, the bonded specimens were loaded to failure. For the SFS test, repeated subcritical load was applied to the specimens. The flexural strength of the RLCs in different curing modes were also determined. Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test, was used for SBS, and a modified t-test with Bonferroni correction was used for SFS (α = 0.05).

Results: The SFS results showed a similar trend to the SBS results. The self-adhesive RLCs alone showed significantly lower SFS values in the self-cure mode than in the dual-cure mode. The dual-cure mode triggered higher flexural strength than the self-cure mode.

Conclusion: The universal adhesive combined self-adhesive RLCs showed significantly higher bond effectiveness than self-adhesive RLCs alone.

Significance: The self-adhesive RLCs combined with universal adhesive may enhance interlocking and chemical bonding. However, light irradiation of the RLC paste remains essential to ensure optimal bonding effectiveness.

通用胶粘剂的应用和固化方式影响自粘树脂粘结剂与牙本质的剪切粘接强度和剪切疲劳粘接强度。
目的:测定在不同固化方式下,使用或不使用通用粘结剂的自粘树脂粘结剂(rlc)与牙本质的剪切粘接强度(SBS)和剪切疲劳粘接强度(SFS)。方法:使用两种自粘rlc (BeautiLink SA和RelyX通用树脂水泥),使用或不使用通用粘合剂。采用常规RLC系统(Panavia V5)进行对比分析。每组36只,SBS试验12只,SFS试验24只。将不锈钢棒与牙本质进行光固化和不光固化。在SBS试验中,粘结试件被加载至破坏。在SFS试验中,反复对试件施加亚临界载荷。测定了不同养护方式下rlc的抗弯强度。SBS采用Tukey’s honest显著性差异检验进行方差分析,SFS采用Bonferroni修正t检验(α = 0.05)。结果:SFS结果与SBS结果具有相似的趋势。单用自固化rlc的SFS值明显低于双固化rlc的SFS值。双固化模式比自固化模式触发更高的抗弯强度。结论:万能胶联合自粘胶粘结效果明显高于单用自粘胶粘结效果。意义:自粘rlc与通用胶粘剂结合可增强联锁和化学键合。然而,RLC浆料的光照射仍然是确保最佳粘合效果的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信