The Influence of Spatial Distance and Environment on Small-Scale Genetic Variability in Eelgrass and Its Application for Restoration

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Marlene Jahnke, Stefanie R. Ries, Swantje Enge, Christian Pansch, Giannina Hattich, Maru Bernal-Gómez, Pierre De Wit, Jonathan Havenhand
{"title":"The Influence of Spatial Distance and Environment on Small-Scale Genetic Variability in Eelgrass and Its Application for Restoration","authors":"Marlene Jahnke,&nbsp;Stefanie R. Ries,&nbsp;Swantje Enge,&nbsp;Christian Pansch,&nbsp;Giannina Hattich,&nbsp;Maru Bernal-Gómez,&nbsp;Pierre De Wit,&nbsp;Jonathan Havenhand","doi":"10.1111/eva.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying suitable donor sites is an important component of successful restoration and reduces the likelihood that a restoration action will have negative impacts on surrounding populations. Whether the most suitable donor site has (1) fast-growing phenotypes, (2) high genetic diversity, or (3) harbors alleles that are beneficial for the current or future environment at the restoration site is an ongoing debate in restoration genomics. It is also debated whether one single donor site is the best choice, or if a mixed provenance strategy from sites with different characteristics is preferable. For eelgrass restoration, donor material is typically sourced within a few kilometers. It is therefore also this small spatial scale that needs to be considered when testing which local meadows harbor the most beneficial donor material for a given restoration site. We here assessed micro-habitat differences at 10 eelgrass meadows across 1.5–14 km and genotyped the 10 meadows at 1689 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We observed substantial differences in temperature regimes, genetic differentiation, and genetic diversity. We found that even on this small scale, 10% of the overall genetic variation was explained by the local environment of the meadow as well as geographic distance and genetic differentiation. We also identified putative adaptive loci associated with environmental variables and detected differences in growth in common-garden mesocosm experiments simulating ambient summer conditions as well as a marine heatwave with concurrent freshening. We highlight that the variation in environment, genetic diversity, local adaptation, the potential for preadaptation for future conditions, and differences in individual growth can be strong in eelgrass meadows even on the small spatial scale. We suggest a donor registry to take into account these differences and narrow down the pool of potential donor meadows to source the most beneficial combination of donor material for any given restoration site.</p>","PeriodicalId":168,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Applications","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eva.70127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Applications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.70127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying suitable donor sites is an important component of successful restoration and reduces the likelihood that a restoration action will have negative impacts on surrounding populations. Whether the most suitable donor site has (1) fast-growing phenotypes, (2) high genetic diversity, or (3) harbors alleles that are beneficial for the current or future environment at the restoration site is an ongoing debate in restoration genomics. It is also debated whether one single donor site is the best choice, or if a mixed provenance strategy from sites with different characteristics is preferable. For eelgrass restoration, donor material is typically sourced within a few kilometers. It is therefore also this small spatial scale that needs to be considered when testing which local meadows harbor the most beneficial donor material for a given restoration site. We here assessed micro-habitat differences at 10 eelgrass meadows across 1.5–14 km and genotyped the 10 meadows at 1689 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We observed substantial differences in temperature regimes, genetic differentiation, and genetic diversity. We found that even on this small scale, 10% of the overall genetic variation was explained by the local environment of the meadow as well as geographic distance and genetic differentiation. We also identified putative adaptive loci associated with environmental variables and detected differences in growth in common-garden mesocosm experiments simulating ambient summer conditions as well as a marine heatwave with concurrent freshening. We highlight that the variation in environment, genetic diversity, local adaptation, the potential for preadaptation for future conditions, and differences in individual growth can be strong in eelgrass meadows even on the small spatial scale. We suggest a donor registry to take into account these differences and narrow down the pool of potential donor meadows to source the most beneficial combination of donor material for any given restoration site.

Abstract Image

空间距离和环境对大叶藻小尺度遗传变异的影响及其在恢复中的应用
确定合适的捐赠地点是成功恢复的重要组成部分,并减少恢复行动对周围人口产生负面影响的可能性。最合适的供体位点是否具有(1)快速生长的表型,(2)高遗传多样性,或(3)对恢复位点当前或未来环境有益的等位基因,是恢复基因组学中正在进行的争论。一个单一的供体地点是最好的选择,还是来自不同特征地点的混合来源策略更可取,这也是争论的焦点。对于大叶藻修复,供体材料通常来自几公里内。因此,在测试哪个当地草甸为给定的修复地点提供了最有益的供体材料时,也需要考虑这个小的空间尺度。在此,我们评估了跨越1.5-14 km的10个大叶藻草甸的微生境差异,并对10个草甸的1689个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)进行了基因分型。我们观察到温度制度、遗传分化和遗传多样性的实质性差异。我们发现,即使在这个小尺度上,总体遗传变异的10%可以由草甸的当地环境以及地理距离和遗传分化来解释。我们还确定了与环境变量相关的假定适应性位点,并在模拟环境夏季条件的普通花园中游环境实验中检测到生长差异,以及同时伴有清新的海洋热浪。我们强调,即使在小空间尺度上,环境变化、遗传多样性、局部适应、对未来条件的预适应潜力以及个体生长差异在大叶藻草甸中也可能很强。我们建议建立供体登记,考虑到这些差异,缩小潜在供体草地的范围,为任何给定的恢复地点提供最有益的供体材料组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Applications
Evolutionary Applications 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Applications is a fully peer reviewed open access journal. It publishes papers that utilize concepts from evolutionary biology to address biological questions of health, social and economic relevance. Papers are expected to employ evolutionary concepts or methods to make contributions to areas such as (but not limited to): medicine, agriculture, forestry, exploitation and management (fisheries and wildlife), aquaculture, conservation biology, environmental sciences (including climate change and invasion biology), microbiology, and toxicology. All taxonomic groups are covered from microbes, fungi, plants and animals. In order to better serve the community, we also now strongly encourage submissions of papers making use of modern molecular and genetic methods (population and functional genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, quantitative genetics, association and linkage mapping) to address important questions in any of these disciplines and in an applied evolutionary framework. Theoretical, empirical, synthesis or perspective papers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信