Self-Regulated Moderate Intensity Habitual Exercise and Next-Day Resting Metabolic Rate in Male Endurance Athletes: Implications for Athlete Testing

Jack Eoin Rua O’Neill, Riona Joyce, Niamh Mc Loughlin, Jennifer Robinson, Ciara Mc Phillips, Barry O’Connell, Katy Horner
{"title":"Self-Regulated Moderate Intensity Habitual Exercise and Next-Day Resting Metabolic Rate in Male Endurance Athletes: Implications for Athlete Testing","authors":"Jack Eoin Rua O’Neill,&nbsp;Riona Joyce,&nbsp;Niamh Mc Loughlin,&nbsp;Jennifer Robinson,&nbsp;Ciara Mc Phillips,&nbsp;Barry O’Connell,&nbsp;Katy Horner","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Best practice guidelines for resting metabolic rate (RMR) testing are to avoid moderate to vigorous physical activity for 12–48 h beforehand, the upper limits of which can be difficult for athletes to adhere to. We investigated the effect of self-regulated moderate intensity exercise in a free-living setting on next-day RMR in endurance athletes. Thirteen male endurance athletes participated, alternating between rest and exercise conditions in randomised order. For the exercise condition, participants were instructed to complete a habitual moderate intensity training session (rated 3–4 on the CR-10 rate of perceived exertion scale) on the day before RMR measurement. Recovery markers (blood urea and subjective wellness) were assessed, and intra-individual variation in RMR was explored. Mean (SD) habitual exercise session duration was 111 ± 71 min, heart rate was 128 ± 16 bpm and RPE score was 3.3 ± 0.5. Next-day RMR did not statistically differ between exercise and rest conditions (1979 ± 289 vs. 1958 ± 251 kcal/day, mean Δ = 21 ± 227 kcal/day [95% CI = −116 to 158 kcal/day], <i>p</i> = 0.74, intra-individual inter-day CV 3.8% ± 3.4%). There were no significant correlations between changes in RMR and recovery markers. The findings suggest habitual moderate intensity exercise may be feasible on the day prior to RMR testing in male endurance athletes. Further investigation to perform equivalence testing between conditions is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Best practice guidelines for resting metabolic rate (RMR) testing are to avoid moderate to vigorous physical activity for 12–48 h beforehand, the upper limits of which can be difficult for athletes to adhere to. We investigated the effect of self-regulated moderate intensity exercise in a free-living setting on next-day RMR in endurance athletes. Thirteen male endurance athletes participated, alternating between rest and exercise conditions in randomised order. For the exercise condition, participants were instructed to complete a habitual moderate intensity training session (rated 3–4 on the CR-10 rate of perceived exertion scale) on the day before RMR measurement. Recovery markers (blood urea and subjective wellness) were assessed, and intra-individual variation in RMR was explored. Mean (SD) habitual exercise session duration was 111 ± 71 min, heart rate was 128 ± 16 bpm and RPE score was 3.3 ± 0.5. Next-day RMR did not statistically differ between exercise and rest conditions (1979 ± 289 vs. 1958 ± 251 kcal/day, mean Δ = 21 ± 227 kcal/day [95% CI = −116 to 158 kcal/day], p = 0.74, intra-individual inter-day CV 3.8% ± 3.4%). There were no significant correlations between changes in RMR and recovery markers. The findings suggest habitual moderate intensity exercise may be feasible on the day prior to RMR testing in male endurance athletes. Further investigation to perform equivalence testing between conditions is warranted.

Abstract Image

自我调节中等强度习惯性运动与男性耐力运动员次日静息代谢率:对运动员测试的启示
静息代谢率(RMR)测试的最佳实践指南是在测试前12-48小时避免中度到剧烈的身体活动,运动员很难坚持运动的上限。我们研究了自由生活环境下自我调节的中等强度运动对耐力运动员第二天RMR的影响。13名男性耐力运动员参加了这项研究,他们按随机顺序交替进行休息和锻炼。对于运动条件,要求参与者在RMR测量前一天完成习惯性中等强度训练(CR-10感知运动率评分为3-4)。评估恢复指标(血尿素和主观健康),并探讨RMR的个体差异。平均(SD)习惯性运动时间为111±71 min,心率为128±16 bpm, RPE评分为3.3±0.5。第二天RMR在运动和休息条件下无统计学差异(1979±289 vs 1958±251 kcal/day,平均值Δ = 21±227 kcal/day [95% CI = - 116 ~ 158 kcal/day], p = 0.74,个体内日间CV 3.8%±3.4%)。RMR变化与恢复指标之间无显著相关性。研究结果表明,在男性耐力运动员进行RMR测试的前一天进行习惯性中等强度的运动是可行的。进一步的调查,以执行条件之间的等效测试是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信