Rethinking Trust in the Refugee Resettlement Process: How Service Providers Can Enable Refugee Agency Through Diasporic Connections

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Mahfoudha Sidelemine, Emily D. Campion
{"title":"Rethinking Trust in the Refugee Resettlement Process: How Service Providers Can Enable Refugee Agency Through Diasporic Connections","authors":"Mahfoudha Sidelemine,&nbsp;Emily D. Campion","doi":"10.1111/imig.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current guidance for refugee resettlement agency workers encourages the simultaneous pursuit of trust-building and administrative tasks (e.g., housing, transportation and employment). This dual goal is resource-intensive, and focusing on the former may come at a cost to the latter. The purpose of the current research is to challenge the importance of trust-building by resettlement agencies. Drawing from our qualitative data from in-depth interviews with resettled refugees (<i>N</i> = 20) and agency workers (<i>N</i> = 15), we adopt a grounded theory approach and find that the burden of responsibility for both caregiving and administrative responsibilities can overtax agency workers and create unrealistic expectations for refugee newcomers that can potentially have lasting negative effects on their resettlement. We explore the relationships among refugees and service providers and propose a self-efficacy focused rather than solely a trust-focused approach that prioritises opportunities of reciprocity for refugees that enables them to engage, contribute and be agents in their resettlement (self-efficacy approach). This primarily includes delegating some trust-building activities to diaspora to relieve resettlement agency workers of burdensome tasks for which they may be ill-equipped, so they may focus on tasks for which they are qualified and can be more effective. Ultimately, we argue that empowering refugees early on in their resettlement will reduce the likelihood that they will develop long-term reliance on governmental agencies rather than themselves and their new communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current guidance for refugee resettlement agency workers encourages the simultaneous pursuit of trust-building and administrative tasks (e.g., housing, transportation and employment). This dual goal is resource-intensive, and focusing on the former may come at a cost to the latter. The purpose of the current research is to challenge the importance of trust-building by resettlement agencies. Drawing from our qualitative data from in-depth interviews with resettled refugees (N = 20) and agency workers (N = 15), we adopt a grounded theory approach and find that the burden of responsibility for both caregiving and administrative responsibilities can overtax agency workers and create unrealistic expectations for refugee newcomers that can potentially have lasting negative effects on their resettlement. We explore the relationships among refugees and service providers and propose a self-efficacy focused rather than solely a trust-focused approach that prioritises opportunities of reciprocity for refugees that enables them to engage, contribute and be agents in their resettlement (self-efficacy approach). This primarily includes delegating some trust-building activities to diaspora to relieve resettlement agency workers of burdensome tasks for which they may be ill-equipped, so they may focus on tasks for which they are qualified and can be more effective. Ultimately, we argue that empowering refugees early on in their resettlement will reduce the likelihood that they will develop long-term reliance on governmental agencies rather than themselves and their new communities.

Abstract Image

重新思考难民安置过程中的信任:服务提供者如何通过流散联系使难民机构成为可能
目前对难民重新安置机构工作人员的指导鼓励同时从事建立信任和行政工作(例如住房、交通和就业)。这一双重目标是资源密集型的,专注于前者可能会以后者为代价。目前研究的目的是挑战重新安置机构建立信任的重要性。根据我们对重新安置的难民(N = 20)和机构工作人员(N = 15)的深度访谈的定性数据,我们采用了扎根的理论方法,发现照顾和行政责任的责任负担会使机构工作人员负担过重,并对难民新移民产生不切实际的期望,这可能对他们的重新安置产生持久的负面影响。我们探索了难民和服务提供者之间的关系,并提出了一种以自我效能为中心而不仅仅是以信任为中心的方法,这种方法优先考虑难民的互惠机会,使他们能够参与、贡献并成为重新安置的代理人(自我效能方法)。这主要包括将一些建立信任的活动委托给侨民,以减轻安置机构工作人员的负担,因为他们可能没有能力完成繁重的任务,因此他们可以集中精力完成他们有资格和更有效的任务。最后,我们认为,在难民重新安置的早期赋予他们权力,将减少他们长期依赖政府机构而不是他们自己和他们的新社区的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: International Migration is a refereed, policy oriented journal on migration issues as analysed by demographers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists from all parts of the world. It covers the entire field of policy relevance in international migration, giving attention not only to a breadth of topics reflective of policy concerns, but also attention to coverage of all regions of the world and to comparative policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信