Insights on factor analysis applied to multi-trait and multi-environment selection of common bean lines

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1002/csc2.70120
Júlio Augusto de Castro Miguel, Vinícius Quintão Carneiro, Jussara Mencalha, Rafaela Pereira Carvalho, Andreza Rafaely Martins José, José Eulário Lampi Dique, Magno Antonio Patto Ramalho, Tiago de Souza Marçal
{"title":"Insights on factor analysis applied to multi-trait and multi-environment selection of common bean lines","authors":"Júlio Augusto de Castro Miguel,&nbsp;Vinícius Quintão Carneiro,&nbsp;Jussara Mencalha,&nbsp;Rafaela Pereira Carvalho,&nbsp;Andreza Rafaely Martins José,&nbsp;José Eulário Lampi Dique,&nbsp;Magno Antonio Patto Ramalho,&nbsp;Tiago de Souza Marçal","doi":"10.1002/csc2.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the objectives of common bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.) breeding programs is selection of lines with superior agronomic traits that are adapted to different environmental conditions. Thus, the aim of this study was to verify the applicability of factor analysis as a strategy to assist the selection of common bean lines for multi-traits in multi-environments. Thirty-five carioca common bean lines were assessed in three municipalities of the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil) in the dry, winter, and wet seasons between 2017 and 2019. The lines were assessed for angular leaf spot (ALS) severity, plant architecture (PA), and grain yield (GYD). Lines were selected using two scenarios: (1) selection for one trait in a multi-environment and (2) multi-trait selection in a multi-environment. Scenario 1 compared the following strategies: the overall mean, the confidence index proposed by Annicchiarico, and the genotype-ideotype index associated with factor analysis. The proposal in Scenario 2 was selection based only on factor scores or based on the genotype–ideotype index associated with factor analysis. The strategies of selecting lines for a trait assessed in multi-environments based on the overall mean or on the genotype-ideotype index associated with factor analysis proved to be appropriate for traits with a simple (ALS and PA) or complex (GYD) line by environment interaction. Furthermore, the use of the genotype–ideotype index associated with factor analysis showed balance in selection of lines under the condition of the same trait in multi-environments and under that of multi-traits in multi-environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.70120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the objectives of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) breeding programs is selection of lines with superior agronomic traits that are adapted to different environmental conditions. Thus, the aim of this study was to verify the applicability of factor analysis as a strategy to assist the selection of common bean lines for multi-traits in multi-environments. Thirty-five carioca common bean lines were assessed in three municipalities of the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil) in the dry, winter, and wet seasons between 2017 and 2019. The lines were assessed for angular leaf spot (ALS) severity, plant architecture (PA), and grain yield (GYD). Lines were selected using two scenarios: (1) selection for one trait in a multi-environment and (2) multi-trait selection in a multi-environment. Scenario 1 compared the following strategies: the overall mean, the confidence index proposed by Annicchiarico, and the genotype-ideotype index associated with factor analysis. The proposal in Scenario 2 was selection based only on factor scores or based on the genotype–ideotype index associated with factor analysis. The strategies of selecting lines for a trait assessed in multi-environments based on the overall mean or on the genotype-ideotype index associated with factor analysis proved to be appropriate for traits with a simple (ALS and PA) or complex (GYD) line by environment interaction. Furthermore, the use of the genotype–ideotype index associated with factor analysis showed balance in selection of lines under the condition of the same trait in multi-environments and under that of multi-traits in multi-environments.

因子分析在普通豆系多性状多环境选择中的应用
菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)育种计划的目标之一是选择具有适应不同环境条件的优良农艺性状的品系。因此,本研究的目的是验证因子分析作为辅助多环境下多性状普通豆系选择策略的适用性。在2017年至2019年的旱季、冬季和雨季,在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州的三个城市对35个carioca普通豆品系进行了评估。评估了这些品系的角斑病(ALS)严重程度、植株构型(PA)和籽粒产量(GYD)。选育采用两种情景:(1)多环境下单性状选择和(2)多环境下多性状选择。情景1比较了以下策略:总体均值、Annicchiarico提出的置信度指数和因子分析相关的基因型-理想型指数。方案2的建议是仅基于因子得分或基于与因子分析相关的基因型-理想型指数进行选择。在环境互作条件下,对单系(ALS和PA)或复合系(GYD)的性状,采用综合平均值或基因型-理想型指数进行选择的策略是合适的。基因型-理想型指数结合因子分析表明,同一性状在多环境条件下的选择与多性状在多环境条件下的选择是平衡的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信