Optimizing canola production in the Northern Great Plains by leveraging genotype × environment × management synergies

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1002/csc2.70115
Brian L. Beres, Zhijie Wang, F. Craig Stevenson, Charles M. Geddes, Breanne D. Tidemann, Hiroshi Kubota, William E. May, Ramona M. Mohr
{"title":"Optimizing canola production in the Northern Great Plains by leveraging genotype × environment × management synergies","authors":"Brian L. Beres,&nbsp;Zhijie Wang,&nbsp;F. Craig Stevenson,&nbsp;Charles M. Geddes,&nbsp;Breanne D. Tidemann,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kubota,&nbsp;William E. May,&nbsp;Ramona M. Mohr","doi":"10.1002/csc2.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Management practices and cultivars for canola (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) have evolved for seeding and harvest management systems including the adoption of straight-cutting (S/C) over windrowing. We explored how manipulations to seeding rate, pod shatter reduction hybrid, and harvest method alter canola seed yield and quality. An experiment was conducted at five locations across the Canadian Prairies between 2018 and 2022, consisting of two pod shatter reduction hybrids with contrasting growth phenology sown at densities of 60, 120, and 180 seeds m<sup>−2</sup>, and subjected to either windrowing at 60% and 90% seed color change (SCC), or S/C at 10% and 5% seed moisture. Irrespective of hybrid choice or harvest management, densities of 120 and 180 seeds m<sup>−2</sup> provided high and stable yield relative to 60 seeds m<sup>−2</sup>. Seed losses were minimal for both hybrids, but the late-maturing cultivar expressed higher seed yield and oil concentration. Straight-cutting at 10% seed moisture achieved the highest yields for both hybrids, but delays in S/C timing reduced its advantage over windrowing at 90% SCC. Yield components such as seed number and seed weight on secondary branches became critical to achieve high yields at lower seeding densities when environmental stress was low. While reducing seeding densities to cut costs can be tempting, the highest and most stable yields were achieved with a late-maturing hybrid, sown at 120 seeds m<sup>−2</sup> and managed with S/C at harvest. This study provides insights into how seeding density and harvest method interact to affect canola yield within a genetic × environment × management framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.70115","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management practices and cultivars for canola (Brassica napus L.) have evolved for seeding and harvest management systems including the adoption of straight-cutting (S/C) over windrowing. We explored how manipulations to seeding rate, pod shatter reduction hybrid, and harvest method alter canola seed yield and quality. An experiment was conducted at five locations across the Canadian Prairies between 2018 and 2022, consisting of two pod shatter reduction hybrids with contrasting growth phenology sown at densities of 60, 120, and 180 seeds m−2, and subjected to either windrowing at 60% and 90% seed color change (SCC), or S/C at 10% and 5% seed moisture. Irrespective of hybrid choice or harvest management, densities of 120 and 180 seeds m−2 provided high and stable yield relative to 60 seeds m−2. Seed losses were minimal for both hybrids, but the late-maturing cultivar expressed higher seed yield and oil concentration. Straight-cutting at 10% seed moisture achieved the highest yields for both hybrids, but delays in S/C timing reduced its advantage over windrowing at 90% SCC. Yield components such as seed number and seed weight on secondary branches became critical to achieve high yields at lower seeding densities when environmental stress was low. While reducing seeding densities to cut costs can be tempting, the highest and most stable yields were achieved with a late-maturing hybrid, sown at 120 seeds m−2 and managed with S/C at harvest. This study provides insights into how seeding density and harvest method interact to affect canola yield within a genetic × environment × management framework.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用基因型×环境×管理协同效应优化大平原北部油菜生产
油菜(Brassica napus L.)的管理实践和栽培品种已经演变为播种和收获管理系统,包括采用直切(S/C)而不是开窗。探讨了播种率、荚果破碎减量杂交和采收方式对油菜籽产量和品质的影响。2018年至2022年,在加拿大大草原的5个地点进行了一项试验,试验中,两种荚果破碎减减型杂交油菜分别以60、120和180粒m−2的密度播种,在60%和90%的种子颜色变化(SCC)下进行开窗,或在10%和5%的种子湿度下进行S/C开窗。无论杂交选择或收获管理如何,相对于60粒m - 2, 120粒和180粒m - 2的密度均能提供较高且稳定的产量。两种杂交品种的种子损失都很小,但晚熟品种的种子产量和含油量更高。在10%的种子水分条件下直接扦插获得了两种杂交种的最高产量,但在90%的SCC条件下,S/C时间的延迟降低了其优势。在低环境胁迫条件下,种子数和二次枝种子重等产量要素对低播种密度下的高产至关重要。虽然降低播种密度以降低成本可能是诱人的,但晚熟杂交品种的产量最高、最稳定,播种密度为120粒/ m2,收获时采用S/C管理。该研究揭示了在遗传×环境×管理框架下,播种密度和收获方式如何相互作用影响油菜产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信