Practicality Study on AI-Assisted AOI in Inkjet-Printed FPC Manufacturing for Predictive Electromagnetic Responses

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Kuan-Yi Wu;Cheng-Yao Lo
{"title":"Practicality Study on AI-Assisted AOI in Inkjet-Printed FPC Manufacturing for Predictive Electromagnetic Responses","authors":"Kuan-Yi Wu;Cheng-Yao Lo","doi":"10.1109/LSENS.2025.3582054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An artificial intelligence (AI) model based on Gaussian process regression with covariance function of exponential was established with inkjet-printed flexible printed circuits (FPCs). The AI model was proposed for antenna characteristic prediction through line edge roughness (LER) of the fabricated patterns as a part of the automated optical inspection (AOI). FPCs of antennas in spiral shapes operating at 2.45 GHz were designed with three pattern distortions to imitate practical situations in inkjet printing; and 144 and 36 samples were fabricated as the training and testing groups for AI modeling, respectively. The capacitance value, operating frequency, and coupling efficiency in terms of intensity loss were characterized through simulation, measurement, and prediction in this work. Results indicated that along the deterioration of the LER, all three characteristics degraded as expected. Quantified statistics proved that the predicted capacitance value, operating frequency, and intensity loss exhibited remarkable correctness: root mean square error was 0.0499 pF, 0.0004 GHz, and 0.0430 dB, respectively; with linear coefficient of determination of 0.9862, 0.9828, and 0.9946 from their measured counterparts, respectively. These results outperformed those demonstrated with an AI model established with printed circuit board, which failed to reflect genuine wetting behaviors usually appear in printed electronics. The difference between the measured and predicted capacitance value, operating frequency, and coupling efficiency was merely 0.1583%, 0.0159%, and 0.0564%, respectively; indicating the effectiveness and practicality of introducing the AOI and AI for off-line characteristic prediction from in-line pattern integrity of microelectronic component in a production line.","PeriodicalId":13014,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Letters","volume":"9 8","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11045975/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An artificial intelligence (AI) model based on Gaussian process regression with covariance function of exponential was established with inkjet-printed flexible printed circuits (FPCs). The AI model was proposed for antenna characteristic prediction through line edge roughness (LER) of the fabricated patterns as a part of the automated optical inspection (AOI). FPCs of antennas in spiral shapes operating at 2.45 GHz were designed with three pattern distortions to imitate practical situations in inkjet printing; and 144 and 36 samples were fabricated as the training and testing groups for AI modeling, respectively. The capacitance value, operating frequency, and coupling efficiency in terms of intensity loss were characterized through simulation, measurement, and prediction in this work. Results indicated that along the deterioration of the LER, all three characteristics degraded as expected. Quantified statistics proved that the predicted capacitance value, operating frequency, and intensity loss exhibited remarkable correctness: root mean square error was 0.0499 pF, 0.0004 GHz, and 0.0430 dB, respectively; with linear coefficient of determination of 0.9862, 0.9828, and 0.9946 from their measured counterparts, respectively. These results outperformed those demonstrated with an AI model established with printed circuit board, which failed to reflect genuine wetting behaviors usually appear in printed electronics. The difference between the measured and predicted capacitance value, operating frequency, and coupling efficiency was merely 0.1583%, 0.0159%, and 0.0564%, respectively; indicating the effectiveness and practicality of introducing the AOI and AI for off-line characteristic prediction from in-line pattern integrity of microelectronic component in a production line.
人工智能辅助AOI在喷墨印刷FPC制造中预测电磁响应的实用性研究
以喷墨印刷柔性印刷电路为研究对象,建立了基于指数协方差函数高斯过程回归的人工智能模型。作为自动光学检测(AOI)的一部分,提出了通过线边缘粗糙度(LER)预测天线特性的人工智能模型。为模拟喷墨打印的实际情况,设计了工作频率为2.45 GHz的螺旋形天线fpc;分别制作144个和36个样本作为AI建模的训练组和测试组。本工作通过仿真、测量和预测对电容值、工作频率和耦合效率进行了表征。结果表明,随着LER的恶化,这三个特征都像预期的那样退化。量化统计表明,预测的电容值、工作频率和强度损耗具有显著的正确性:均方根误差分别为0.0499 pF、0.0004 GHz和0.0430 dB;其线性决定系数分别为0.9862、0.9828和0.9946。这些结果优于用印刷电路板建立的人工智能模型所展示的结果,后者未能反映印刷电子产品中通常出现的真实润湿行为。电容值、工作频率和耦合效率的实测值与预测值的差异仅为0.1583%、0.0159%和0.0564%;说明了在生产线中引入AOI和AI进行微电子元件在线模式完整性离线特性预测的有效性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Letters
IEEE Sensors Letters Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
194
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信