Mohammad Anis , Srinivas R. Geedipally , Dominique Lord
{"title":"Pedestrian crash causation analysis near bus stops: Insights from random parameters Negative Binomial–Lindley model","authors":"Mohammad Anis , Srinivas R. Geedipally , Dominique Lord","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pedestrian safety remains a pressing concern near bus stops along urban transit, where frequent pedestrian–vehicle interactions occur. While prior research has primarily focused on intersections and midblock locations, bus stops have often been treated as secondary contributors rather than as distinct sites requiring targeted safety assessments. This has left a critical gap in understanding how traffic exposure, roadway characteristics, and bus stop design features specifically influence pedestrian crash risks around bus stop locations. To address these gaps, this study develops a comprehensive framework focused on pedestrian safety in the vicinity of bus stops. The proposed approach employs a Random Parameters Negative Binomial–Lindley (RPNB–L) model to account for unobserved heterogeneity and site-specific variability. Using data from 596 bus stops in Fort Worth, Texas (2018–2022), the model identifies that higher pedestrian crash frequencies are significantly associated with increased AADT, elevated boarding activity, and the absence of key safety elements such as crosswalks, medians, and lighting. Conversely, far-side bus stop placement, signalized intersections, sidewalks, and mixed-use development are associated with lower crash risks. Roads near schools and those with speed limits of <span><math><mo>≤</mo></math></span>35 mph show elevated crash risk. To support proactive safety management, the study integrates a Full Bayes-based Potential for Safety Improvement (PSI) metric, enabling the identification of hazardous stops and high-risk corridors. By unifying advanced count-based modeling with strategic risk prioritization, this research offers actionable, data-driven insights for improving pedestrian safety near bus stops.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108137"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525002234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pedestrian safety remains a pressing concern near bus stops along urban transit, where frequent pedestrian–vehicle interactions occur. While prior research has primarily focused on intersections and midblock locations, bus stops have often been treated as secondary contributors rather than as distinct sites requiring targeted safety assessments. This has left a critical gap in understanding how traffic exposure, roadway characteristics, and bus stop design features specifically influence pedestrian crash risks around bus stop locations. To address these gaps, this study develops a comprehensive framework focused on pedestrian safety in the vicinity of bus stops. The proposed approach employs a Random Parameters Negative Binomial–Lindley (RPNB–L) model to account for unobserved heterogeneity and site-specific variability. Using data from 596 bus stops in Fort Worth, Texas (2018–2022), the model identifies that higher pedestrian crash frequencies are significantly associated with increased AADT, elevated boarding activity, and the absence of key safety elements such as crosswalks, medians, and lighting. Conversely, far-side bus stop placement, signalized intersections, sidewalks, and mixed-use development are associated with lower crash risks. Roads near schools and those with speed limits of 35 mph show elevated crash risk. To support proactive safety management, the study integrates a Full Bayes-based Potential for Safety Improvement (PSI) metric, enabling the identification of hazardous stops and high-risk corridors. By unifying advanced count-based modeling with strategic risk prioritization, this research offers actionable, data-driven insights for improving pedestrian safety near bus stops.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.