Improvement of pedicle screw placement with first-time use of patient specific drill guides by novice surgeon

Q3 Medicine
Kyle Walker , Kunal Verma , Michael Silverstein , David Gurd
{"title":"Improvement of pedicle screw placement with first-time use of patient specific drill guides by novice surgeon","authors":"Kyle Walker ,&nbsp;Kunal Verma ,&nbsp;Michael Silverstein ,&nbsp;David Gurd","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2025.100215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Accurate placement of pedicle screws is a key component of spine surgery. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a 3-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) guide in improving pedicle screw trajectory placement for a first-time user.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A computed tomography scan of a cadaveric spine was obtained and 3D reconstructed virtually. One pedicle at each vertebra was randomized to the PSI or freehand (FH) grouping. Screw trajectories were virtually planned for T1-L5 vertebral levels. A junior orthopaedic surgery resident used the PSI to place a screw at 17 vertebral levels and then returned on a separate day to place screws using FH technique. No adjustments from the initial placement were allowed. Postoperatively the spine was rescanned and analyzed by a blinded senior attending surgeon for perforation, adequacy of placement, and likelihood of unfavorable outcome. The PSI grouping was analyzed objectively for deviation from the preoperative plan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five of the FH screws were deemed to likely result in paralysis or major neurovascular injury vs zero in the PSI grouping (p-value 0.045). The mean PSI placement time was 47.9 s faster per level than the FH placement time (145.2 ± 74.4 vs 193.1 ± 43.0 s; p-value 0.032). The PSI trajectories were accurate within 2.75 mm and 9.0 degrees of the planned trajectories (p-value 0.045; p-value 0.036).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PSI system appears to offer a relatively inexpensive, user-friendly, and sufficiently accurate solution to pedicle screw placement for even a novice surgeon using the technology for the first time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate placement of pedicle screws is a key component of spine surgery. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a 3-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) guide in improving pedicle screw trajectory placement for a first-time user.

Methods

A computed tomography scan of a cadaveric spine was obtained and 3D reconstructed virtually. One pedicle at each vertebra was randomized to the PSI or freehand (FH) grouping. Screw trajectories were virtually planned for T1-L5 vertebral levels. A junior orthopaedic surgery resident used the PSI to place a screw at 17 vertebral levels and then returned on a separate day to place screws using FH technique. No adjustments from the initial placement were allowed. Postoperatively the spine was rescanned and analyzed by a blinded senior attending surgeon for perforation, adequacy of placement, and likelihood of unfavorable outcome. The PSI grouping was analyzed objectively for deviation from the preoperative plan.

Results

Five of the FH screws were deemed to likely result in paralysis or major neurovascular injury vs zero in the PSI grouping (p-value 0.045). The mean PSI placement time was 47.9 s faster per level than the FH placement time (145.2 ± 74.4 vs 193.1 ± 43.0 s; p-value 0.032). The PSI trajectories were accurate within 2.75 mm and 9.0 degrees of the planned trajectories (p-value 0.045; p-value 0.036).

Conclusions

The PSI system appears to offer a relatively inexpensive, user-friendly, and sufficiently accurate solution to pedicle screw placement for even a novice surgeon using the technology for the first time.
新手外科医生首次使用患者专用钻头导引改善椎弓根螺钉置入
目的椎弓根螺钉的准确放置是脊柱外科手术的关键组成部分。本研究的目的是评估三维(3D)打印患者专用器械(PSI)指南在改善首次使用者椎弓根螺钉轨迹放置方面的准确性和精密度。方法对尸体脊柱进行计算机断层扫描,并进行虚拟三维重建。每个椎体的一个椎弓根随机分为PSI组或徒手组。在T1-L5椎体水平实际上规划了螺钉轨迹。一名初级骨科住院医师使用PSI在17个椎体水平放置螺钉,然后在另一天使用FH技术放置螺钉。不允许对初始位置进行调整。术后对脊柱进行重新扫描,并由一名盲法资深主治医生对穿孔、放置的适当性和不良结果的可能性进行分析。客观分析PSI分组是否偏离术前计划。结果FH组有5例可能导致瘫痪或严重神经血管损伤,PSI组为0例(p值为0.045)。平均PSI放置时间比FH放置时间快47.9 s(145.2±74.4 vs 193.1±43.0 s);假定值0.032)。PSI轨迹在计划轨迹的2.75 mm和9.0度范围内准确(p值0.045;假定值0.036)。结论PSI系统似乎提供了一种相对便宜、用户友好且足够准确的椎弓根螺钉置入解决方案,即使是新手外科医生第一次使用该技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信