Walquiria N. Silva , Erik Eduardo Rego , Giovani G.T.T. Vieira , Luís F.N. Lourenço , Mauricio B.C. Salles
{"title":"An overview of Brazil's electricity market: Planning, dispatch models, pricing, and modernization","authors":"Walquiria N. Silva , Erik Eduardo Rego , Giovani G.T.T. Vieira , Luís F.N. Lourenço , Mauricio B.C. Salles","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Brazilian electricity market is a highly complex system that operates under a centralized dispatch model, where generation is optimized based on cost-minimization principles. This structure has historically ensured energy security and ensured coordination of hydrothermal resources. However, as the electricity matrix evolves with increasing shares of variable renewable energy, new challenges emerge concerning operational flexibility, system balancing, and market efficiency. Unlike deregulated markets where short-term price signals and locational pricing mechanisms guide dispatch decisions, the Brazilian model remains heavily cost-driven and centrally coordinated, raising discussions about its long-term adaptability. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the Brazilian electricity sector, focusing on dispatch optimization, system operation, and long-term planning frameworks as structured in 2025. The research condenses key aspects of the NEWAVE, DECOMP, and DESSEM models, detailing their role in hydrothermal scheduling and their limitations in accommodating a more dynamic and decentralized energy landscape. By consolidating fragmented discussions from the existing literature, this work bridges the knowledge gap on how Brazil's market operates and compares to more advanced market designs. Incorporating lessons learned from international experiences, the study aims to identify market mechanisms and regulatory frameworks that can enhance Brazil's pricing models, flexibility resources, and real-time system coordination. Ultimately, this study serves as a reference for the international energy community, presenting a comprehensive and structured analysis of the Brazilian electricity market. It explores potential avenues for modernization, informed by global best practices, the evolution of contemporary market paradigms, and the ongoing energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Brazilian electricity market is a highly complex system that operates under a centralized dispatch model, where generation is optimized based on cost-minimization principles. This structure has historically ensured energy security and ensured coordination of hydrothermal resources. However, as the electricity matrix evolves with increasing shares of variable renewable energy, new challenges emerge concerning operational flexibility, system balancing, and market efficiency. Unlike deregulated markets where short-term price signals and locational pricing mechanisms guide dispatch decisions, the Brazilian model remains heavily cost-driven and centrally coordinated, raising discussions about its long-term adaptability. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the Brazilian electricity sector, focusing on dispatch optimization, system operation, and long-term planning frameworks as structured in 2025. The research condenses key aspects of the NEWAVE, DECOMP, and DESSEM models, detailing their role in hydrothermal scheduling and their limitations in accommodating a more dynamic and decentralized energy landscape. By consolidating fragmented discussions from the existing literature, this work bridges the knowledge gap on how Brazil's market operates and compares to more advanced market designs. Incorporating lessons learned from international experiences, the study aims to identify market mechanisms and regulatory frameworks that can enhance Brazil's pricing models, flexibility resources, and real-time system coordination. Ultimately, this study serves as a reference for the international energy community, presenting a comprehensive and structured analysis of the Brazilian electricity market. It explores potential avenues for modernization, informed by global best practices, the evolution of contemporary market paradigms, and the ongoing energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.