Strive to fit: Person, vocation, and organization strivings' impact on employee engagement and job performance

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Justin P. Wiegand , Timothy J. Morgan
{"title":"Strive to fit: Person, vocation, and organization strivings' impact on employee engagement and job performance","authors":"Justin P. Wiegand ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Morgan","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study integrates person–environment (P–E) fit theory and the Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior (TPWB) to examine how motivational strivings—achievement, communion, and status—align across personal, vocational, and organizational contexts to predict engagement and job performance. We hypothesize that (a) engagement increases when personal and environmental strivings concurrently increase, (b) engagement is greater when personal strivings exceed corresponding environmental strivings, and (c) engagement mediates the effect of P–E strivings on performance. Using polynomial regression and response surface methodology, we analyze three-wave data from 1188 employees and their supervisors across 98 roles and 83 organizations. Results generally affirmed hypothesized relationships, with person-vocation status striving misfit providing an interesting exception. Implications for understanding differences in work motivation and performance within the TPWB and P-E fit theory are discussed. Together, the results deepen theoretical understanding of how person and environment strivings shape engagement and performance, while offering practical insights for enhancing key work outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 113370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study integrates person–environment (P–E) fit theory and the Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior (TPWB) to examine how motivational strivings—achievement, communion, and status—align across personal, vocational, and organizational contexts to predict engagement and job performance. We hypothesize that (a) engagement increases when personal and environmental strivings concurrently increase, (b) engagement is greater when personal strivings exceed corresponding environmental strivings, and (c) engagement mediates the effect of P–E strivings on performance. Using polynomial regression and response surface methodology, we analyze three-wave data from 1188 employees and their supervisors across 98 roles and 83 organizations. Results generally affirmed hypothesized relationships, with person-vocation status striving misfit providing an interesting exception. Implications for understanding differences in work motivation and performance within the TPWB and P-E fit theory are discussed. Together, the results deepen theoretical understanding of how person and environment strivings shape engagement and performance, while offering practical insights for enhancing key work outcomes.
努力适应:个人、职业和组织努力对员工敬业度和工作绩效的影响
本研究整合了个人-环境(P-E)契合理论和有目的工作行为理论(TPWB),以检验激励性奋斗——成就、交流和地位——如何在个人、职业和组织背景下保持一致,以预测敬业度和工作绩效。我们假设:(a)当个人努力和环境努力同时增加时,敬业度会增加;(b)当个人努力超过相应的环境努力时,敬业度会更大;(c)敬业度会调节P-E努力对绩效的影响。利用多项式回归和响应面方法,我们分析了来自83个组织的98个角色的1188名员工及其主管的三波数据。结果普遍肯定了假设的关系,个人-职业状态奋斗不匹配提供了一个有趣的例外。本文讨论了在TPWB和P-E契合理论中理解工作动机和绩效差异的意义。总之,这些结果加深了对人与环境的努力如何塑造敬业度和绩效的理论理解,同时为提高关键工作成果提供了实际见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信