Soil thickness prediction models: Types, accuracy and influencing factors

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qilian Zhu , Zhen Han , Fayong Fang , Rui Hou , Longshan Zhao
{"title":"Soil thickness prediction models: Types, accuracy and influencing factors","authors":"Qilian Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhen Han ,&nbsp;Fayong Fang ,&nbsp;Rui Hou ,&nbsp;Longshan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil thickness is a key soil property that critically influences geomorphological processes, hydrological dynamics, and related domains. It is affected by many factors and has strong spatial heterogeneity; thus, accurate soil thickness prediction is typically difficult to achieve. In this paper, the types, accuracies and influencing factors of soil thickness prediction models were reviewed. We collected 123 publications related to soil thickness prediction worldwide and performed statistical analysis on 732 observations. The results showed that the spatial interpolation method had the highest prediction accuracy among the various models. Furthermore, the highest prediction accuracy among the different study area sizes was achieved for areas <span><math><mo>≤</mo></math></span> 25,000 km<sup>2</sup>. The sample density had a significant positive effect (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), whereas the observed range of soil thickness and the number of predictors had significant negative effects (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). However, under different methods and area sizes, the effects of the number of predictors, observed range of soil thickness, sample density, and DEM resolution on prediction accuracy needs to be specifically analyzed. Future research on soil thickness prediction should prioritize the integration of methods, uncertainty assessment of predictive results, and interpretability of predictive results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109282"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225005843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil thickness is a key soil property that critically influences geomorphological processes, hydrological dynamics, and related domains. It is affected by many factors and has strong spatial heterogeneity; thus, accurate soil thickness prediction is typically difficult to achieve. In this paper, the types, accuracies and influencing factors of soil thickness prediction models were reviewed. We collected 123 publications related to soil thickness prediction worldwide and performed statistical analysis on 732 observations. The results showed that the spatial interpolation method had the highest prediction accuracy among the various models. Furthermore, the highest prediction accuracy among the different study area sizes was achieved for areas 25,000 km2. The sample density had a significant positive effect (P < 0.05), whereas the observed range of soil thickness and the number of predictors had significant negative effects (P < 0.05). However, under different methods and area sizes, the effects of the number of predictors, observed range of soil thickness, sample density, and DEM resolution on prediction accuracy needs to be specifically analyzed. Future research on soil thickness prediction should prioritize the integration of methods, uncertainty assessment of predictive results, and interpretability of predictive results.
土壤厚度预测模型:类型、精度及影响因素
土壤厚度是影响地貌过程、水文动力学和相关领域的关键土壤属性。受多种因素影响,具有较强的空间异质性;因此,准确的土壤厚度预测通常难以实现。本文综述了土壤厚度预测模型的类型、精度及其影响因素。我们收集了123篇与全球土壤厚度预测相关的出版物,并对732个观测结果进行了统计分析。结果表明,空间插值方法预测精度最高。在不同研究面积中,预测精度最高的是≤25000 km2的区域。样品密度有显著的正影响(P <;0.05),而土壤厚度观测范围和预测因子数量对土壤质量的影响呈显著负向(P <;0.05)。但是,在不同的方法和面积大小下,需要具体分析预测者数量、土壤厚度观测范围、样本密度和DEM分辨率对预测精度的影响。未来的土壤厚度预测研究应优先考虑方法的整合、预测结果的不确定性评估和预测结果的可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信