When reconciliation overshadows rights: The Métis’ continued fight for health data and recognition

Alexandra Nychuk (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Kiera Kowalski (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Chelsea Gabel (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Robert Henry (Métis - Métis Nation Saskatchewan)
{"title":"When reconciliation overshadows rights: The Métis’ continued fight for health data and recognition","authors":"Alexandra Nychuk (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) ,&nbsp;Kiera Kowalski (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) ,&nbsp;Chelsea Gabel (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) ,&nbsp;Robert Henry (Métis - Métis Nation Saskatchewan)","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act received royal assent in Canada, further affirming inherent rights for Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis). Despite this and a constitutional recognition of Aboriginal rights in 1982, the Métis have yet to have their right to health recognised. The prioritisation of pan-Indigenous approaches to addressing inequities in Canada neglects to recognise the collective rights (exercised through a governing body, nation, tribal community, etc.) that diversifies Indigenous rights from other human rights. Métis critically need accurate health data that are conducted using distinctions-based approaches, as they remain stuck in data dependency. However, a considerable barrier to Métis data collection is that Indigenous health research funding in Canada predominantly favours pan-Indigenous approaches, rendering the Métis insignificant in their fight for health recognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act received royal assent in Canada, further affirming inherent rights for Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis). Despite this and a constitutional recognition of Aboriginal rights in 1982, the Métis have yet to have their right to health recognised. The prioritisation of pan-Indigenous approaches to addressing inequities in Canada neglects to recognise the collective rights (exercised through a governing body, nation, tribal community, etc.) that diversifies Indigenous rights from other human rights. Métis critically need accurate health data that are conducted using distinctions-based approaches, as they remain stuck in data dependency. However, a considerable barrier to Métis data collection is that Indigenous health research funding in Canada predominantly favours pan-Indigenous approaches, rendering the Métis insignificant in their fight for health recognition.
当和解掩盖了权利:姆萨姆族继续争取健康数据和认可
2021年,《联合国土著人民权利宣言》法案在加拿大获得御准,进一步肯定了土著人民(第一民族、因纽特人和姆萨梅蒂斯人)的固有权利。尽管如此,而且1982年宪法承认土著居民的权利,但姆萨迪人的健康权尚未得到承认。在加拿大,将解决不平等问题的泛土著方法列为优先事项,忽视了承认使土著权利有别于其他人权的集体权利(通过理事机构、国家、部落社区等行使)。由于她们仍然陷于对数据的依赖,因此她们迫切需要使用基于区别的方法获得准确的健康数据。然而,收集msamims数据的一个相当大的障碍是,加拿大土著保健研究经费主要支持泛土著方法,使msamims在争取健康承认方面显得微不足道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信