Alexandra Nychuk (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Kiera Kowalski (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Chelsea Gabel (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Robert Henry (Métis - Métis Nation Saskatchewan)
{"title":"When reconciliation overshadows rights: The Métis’ continued fight for health data and recognition","authors":"Alexandra Nychuk (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Kiera Kowalski (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Chelsea Gabel (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Robert Henry (Métis - Métis Nation Saskatchewan)","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act received royal assent in Canada, further affirming inherent rights for Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis). Despite this and a constitutional recognition of Aboriginal rights in 1982, the Métis have yet to have their right to health recognised. The prioritisation of pan-Indigenous approaches to addressing inequities in Canada neglects to recognise the collective rights (exercised through a governing body, nation, tribal community, etc.) that diversifies Indigenous rights from other human rights. Métis critically need accurate health data that are conducted using distinctions-based approaches, as they remain stuck in data dependency. However, a considerable barrier to Métis data collection is that Indigenous health research funding in Canada predominantly favours pan-Indigenous approaches, rendering the Métis insignificant in their fight for health recognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act received royal assent in Canada, further affirming inherent rights for Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis). Despite this and a constitutional recognition of Aboriginal rights in 1982, the Métis have yet to have their right to health recognised. The prioritisation of pan-Indigenous approaches to addressing inequities in Canada neglects to recognise the collective rights (exercised through a governing body, nation, tribal community, etc.) that diversifies Indigenous rights from other human rights. Métis critically need accurate health data that are conducted using distinctions-based approaches, as they remain stuck in data dependency. However, a considerable barrier to Métis data collection is that Indigenous health research funding in Canada predominantly favours pan-Indigenous approaches, rendering the Métis insignificant in their fight for health recognition.