Exploring best practices that integrate environmental health and primary healthcare in Indigenous populations: A scoping review

Jayden Wells , Veronica Matthews , Amal Chakraborty
{"title":"Exploring best practices that integrate environmental health and primary healthcare in Indigenous populations: A scoping review","authors":"Jayden Wells ,&nbsp;Veronica Matthews ,&nbsp;Amal Chakraborty","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Country and the environment are essential components of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing. Colonisation disrupted these essential connections, damaging important reciprocal beneficial relationships that kept Country and community well. As a result, Indigenous populations exhibit poorer health outcomes compared with non-Indigenous Australians, with the life expectancy of Indigenous Australians being 74 years compared with 84 years in the general population. It is reported that 20 to 30 per cent of Indigenous disease burden can be attributed to environmental factors; however, historically, there has been little coordination between the environmental and primary healthcare sectors in Australia. The National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) has called for increased collaboration between environmental initiatives and primary healthcare to address various health disparities present within Indigenous Australians. This scoping review aimed to identify and analyse best practices that integrate environmental health initiatives and primary healthcare within Indigenous populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Standard scoping review methodology was employed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR Joannah Briggs Institute guidelines. Databases that were searched included CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE and Embase, as well as grey literature, between 2004–24. Inclusion criteria focused on studies involving international Indigenous populations, environmental health factors and primary healthcare integration, with two primary reviewers and a third for resolving conflicts.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>A total of 32 papers, primarily from Australia, were included in the final review. Regarding environmental determinants, there was a strong focus on housing condition, water quality and Indigenous land management. Various integrated programs demonstrated significant health improvements, such as reduced prevalence of infectious disease, enhanced cardiovascular health and better mental health outcomes. The concept of Indigenous 'caring for Country' emerged as a central theme, demonstrating the benefits of a unified approach to healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>These findings demonstrate the value of implementing connections between environmental and primary healthcare services in improving Indigenous health. Factors leading to program success included community participation, Indigenous leadership and targeted, place-based interventions. However, there is a general lack of published evidence that sustainably integrates both environmental health and primary care. The limited number of examples demonstrated positive health outcomes, indicating the need for more community-led and Country-centred initiatives within primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Country and the environment are essential components of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing. Colonisation disrupted these essential connections, damaging important reciprocal beneficial relationships that kept Country and community well. As a result, Indigenous populations exhibit poorer health outcomes compared with non-Indigenous Australians, with the life expectancy of Indigenous Australians being 74 years compared with 84 years in the general population. It is reported that 20 to 30 per cent of Indigenous disease burden can be attributed to environmental factors; however, historically, there has been little coordination between the environmental and primary healthcare sectors in Australia. The National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) has called for increased collaboration between environmental initiatives and primary healthcare to address various health disparities present within Indigenous Australians. This scoping review aimed to identify and analyse best practices that integrate environmental health initiatives and primary healthcare within Indigenous populations.

Methods

Standard scoping review methodology was employed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR Joannah Briggs Institute guidelines. Databases that were searched included CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE and Embase, as well as grey literature, between 2004–24. Inclusion criteria focused on studies involving international Indigenous populations, environmental health factors and primary healthcare integration, with two primary reviewers and a third for resolving conflicts.

Main findings

A total of 32 papers, primarily from Australia, were included in the final review. Regarding environmental determinants, there was a strong focus on housing condition, water quality and Indigenous land management. Various integrated programs demonstrated significant health improvements, such as reduced prevalence of infectious disease, enhanced cardiovascular health and better mental health outcomes. The concept of Indigenous 'caring for Country' emerged as a central theme, demonstrating the benefits of a unified approach to healthcare.

Principal conclusions

These findings demonstrate the value of implementing connections between environmental and primary healthcare services in improving Indigenous health. Factors leading to program success included community participation, Indigenous leadership and targeted, place-based interventions. However, there is a general lack of published evidence that sustainably integrates both environmental health and primary care. The limited number of examples demonstrated positive health outcomes, indicating the need for more community-led and Country-centred initiatives within primary care.
探索将土著居民的环境卫生和初级保健结合起来的最佳做法:范围审查
国家和环境是土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民福祉的重要组成部分。殖民破坏了这些重要的联系,破坏了保持国家和社区良好的重要互惠关系。因此,与非土著澳大利亚人相比,土著人口的健康状况较差,土著澳大利亚人的预期寿命为74岁,而一般人口的预期寿命为84岁。据报告,20%至30%的土著疾病负担可归因于环境因素;然而,从历史上看,澳大利亚的环境和初级保健部门之间几乎没有协调。全国土著社区控制的卫生组织呼吁加强环境倡议与初级保健之间的合作,以解决澳大利亚土著居民体内存在的各种健康差距。这次范围审查的目的是确定和分析将环境卫生倡议与土著人口的初级保健结合起来的最佳做法。方法按照PRISMA-ScR乔安娜布里格斯研究所指南采用标准范围审查方法。检索的数据库包括2004-24年间的CINAHL、Scopus、MEDLINE和Embase,以及灰色文献。纳入标准侧重于涉及国际土著人口、环境健康因素和初级保健一体化的研究,有两名主要审查者,第三名审查者负责解决冲突。最终评审共收录了32篇论文,主要来自澳大利亚。关于环境决定因素,重点是住房条件、水质和土著土地管理。各种综合项目显示出显著的健康改善,如降低传染病的患病率、增强心血管健康和改善心理健康结果。土著人“关心国家”的概念成为一个中心主题,展示了统一的医疗保健方法的好处。这些发现表明,在环境和初级保健服务之间建立联系,有助于改善土著居民的健康。导致项目成功的因素包括社区参与、土著领导和有针对性的、基于地点的干预措施。然而,普遍缺乏已发表的证据表明环境卫生和初级保健可以可持续地结合起来。数量有限的例子表明了积极的健康结果,表明需要在初级保健中采取更多社区主导和以国家为中心的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信