The diversity washing dilemma: When signaling diversity enhances image and credibility – And when it backfires

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Thomas Koch, Sandra Mechler, Nora Denner
{"title":"The diversity washing dilemma: When signaling diversity enhances image and credibility – And when it backfires","authors":"Thomas Koch,&nbsp;Sandra Mechler,&nbsp;Nora Denner","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how different presentations of diversity influence perceptions of a company and whether discrepancies between diversity self-presentation and actual diversity cause backfire effects. Additionally, it explores whether these effects occur only in corporate self-presentation or also in product advertising. Two online experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, participants viewed a company presenting itself as highly, somewhat, or not diverse, with perceptions measured before and after revealing its actual lack of diversity. Experiment 2 tested whether diversity claims in self-presentation or product advertising influenced perceptions, again measuring responses before and after revealing the company’s true diversity. Results show that presenting a company as diverse enhances its image, credibility, and behavioral intentions, whether through self-presentation or product communication. However, once a lack of diversity is exposed, perceptions of image and credibility decline, along with application and purchase intentions. Interestingly, companies that misleadingly claimed diversity still received higher ratings than those that were honest about their lack of diversity, but their credibility suffered more when the truth was revealed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how different presentations of diversity influence perceptions of a company and whether discrepancies between diversity self-presentation and actual diversity cause backfire effects. Additionally, it explores whether these effects occur only in corporate self-presentation or also in product advertising. Two online experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, participants viewed a company presenting itself as highly, somewhat, or not diverse, with perceptions measured before and after revealing its actual lack of diversity. Experiment 2 tested whether diversity claims in self-presentation or product advertising influenced perceptions, again measuring responses before and after revealing the company’s true diversity. Results show that presenting a company as diverse enhances its image, credibility, and behavioral intentions, whether through self-presentation or product communication. However, once a lack of diversity is exposed, perceptions of image and credibility decline, along with application and purchase intentions. Interestingly, companies that misleadingly claimed diversity still received higher ratings than those that were honest about their lack of diversity, but their credibility suffered more when the truth was revealed.
多样性清洗困境:什么时候表达多样性可以提升形象和可信度——以及什么时候适得其反
本研究考察了多样性的不同表现如何影响公司的认知,以及多样性自我表现与实际多样性之间的差异是否会导致适得其反的效果。此外,它还探讨了这些影响是否只发生在企业自我展示中,还是也发生在产品广告中。进行了两个在线实验。在实验1中,参与者认为一家公司表现出高度、一定程度或不多样化,并在其实际缺乏多样性之前和之后测量他们的看法。实验2测试了自我展示或产品广告中的多样性主张是否会影响人们的认知,再次测量了揭示公司真实多样性之前和之后的反应。结果表明,无论是通过自我展示还是产品沟通,将公司呈现为多元化都能提高其形象、可信度和行为意图。然而,一旦暴露出缺乏多样性,对形象和可信度的认知就会下降,同时应用和购买意愿也会下降。有趣的是,那些误导性地声称多元化的公司仍然比那些诚实地承认自己缺乏多元化的公司获得更高的评级,但当真相被揭露时,它们的可信度受到的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信