Pause, observe, intend: A qualitative study exploring expert practitioners’ perceptions of how mindfulness and Alexander technique work synergistically to address stress

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Patrick M. Johnson , Gabriella Minnes Brandes , Victoria Door , Rajal G. Cohen
{"title":"Pause, observe, intend: A qualitative study exploring expert practitioners’ perceptions of how mindfulness and Alexander technique work synergistically to address stress","authors":"Patrick M. Johnson ,&nbsp;Gabriella Minnes Brandes ,&nbsp;Victoria Door ,&nbsp;Rajal G. Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Mind-body disciplines provide effective self-regulation strategies in the face of stress, but the specific techniques and proficiencies of these disciplines are not well understood. The qualitative study presented here provides insights into this problem by documenting how expert practitioners understand the experience of engaging two holistic mind-body disciplines together to self-regulate when under stress.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seventeen expert practitioners who were trained and deeply invested in both mindfulness meditation and Alexander technique participated in semi-structured interviews, detailing their experiences as they recalled stressful moments. Results were analyzed with thematic analysis. We used a feminist approach in both interviews and analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our analysis identified three shared themes, each of which describes a skill set useful for managing stress: finding distance and time (pausing and creating emotional distance from the situation), observing (one’s thoughts, emotions, body, and environment), and maintaining an intention (short-term and long-term). These themes provided a framework for comparing how the two disciplines function in practice. Differences lay in specific application, with participants describing mindfulness as providing a more nuanced approach to navigating internal narratives and emotions and Alexander technique as providing more fully developed tools for managing muscular and postural manifestations of stress.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dual-discipline experts can provide rich descriptions of the specific skills cultivated in mind-body disciplines, the advantages and limitations of each discipline, and how two disciplines can work together. Participants described specific ways that mindfulness and Alexander technique can work together to address cognitive, affective, and physical responses to stress, thus providing a comprehensive toolkit for stress management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 102494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382025000460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Mind-body disciplines provide effective self-regulation strategies in the face of stress, but the specific techniques and proficiencies of these disciplines are not well understood. The qualitative study presented here provides insights into this problem by documenting how expert practitioners understand the experience of engaging two holistic mind-body disciplines together to self-regulate when under stress.

Methods

Seventeen expert practitioners who were trained and deeply invested in both mindfulness meditation and Alexander technique participated in semi-structured interviews, detailing their experiences as they recalled stressful moments. Results were analyzed with thematic analysis. We used a feminist approach in both interviews and analysis.

Results

Our analysis identified three shared themes, each of which describes a skill set useful for managing stress: finding distance and time (pausing and creating emotional distance from the situation), observing (one’s thoughts, emotions, body, and environment), and maintaining an intention (short-term and long-term). These themes provided a framework for comparing how the two disciplines function in practice. Differences lay in specific application, with participants describing mindfulness as providing a more nuanced approach to navigating internal narratives and emotions and Alexander technique as providing more fully developed tools for managing muscular and postural manifestations of stress.

Conclusion

Dual-discipline experts can provide rich descriptions of the specific skills cultivated in mind-body disciplines, the advantages and limitations of each discipline, and how two disciplines can work together. Participants described specific ways that mindfulness and Alexander technique can work together to address cognitive, affective, and physical responses to stress, thus providing a comprehensive toolkit for stress management.
暂停,观察,意图:一项定性研究,探索专家实践者对正念和亚历山大技术如何协同工作以解决压力的看法
身心学科提供了面对压力时有效的自我调节策略,但这些学科的具体技术和熟练程度尚不清楚。这里提出的定性研究通过记录专家从业者如何理解在压力下将两个整体身心学科结合在一起进行自我调节的经验,为这个问题提供了见解。方法:17位接受过正念冥想和亚历山大技巧训练的专家参与了半结构化访谈,详细描述了他们回忆压力时刻的经历。对结果进行专题分析。我们在访谈和分析中都使用了女权主义的方法。结果我们的分析确定了三个共同的主题,每个主题都描述了一套对管理压力有用的技能:寻找距离和时间(暂停并与情境建立情感距离),观察(一个人的思想、情感、身体和环境),以及保持一个目标(短期和长期)。这些主题为比较这两个学科在实践中的作用提供了一个框架。不同之处在于具体的应用,参与者将正念描述为提供一种更微妙的方法来驾驭内部叙述和情绪,而亚历山大技术则提供了更成熟的工具来管理肌肉和姿势的压力表现。结论双学科专家可以对心身学科培养的具体技能、各学科的优势和局限性以及两学科如何协同工作等方面提供丰富的描述。参与者描述了正念和亚历山大技巧可以共同解决认知、情感和身体对压力的反应的具体方式,从而为压力管理提供了一个全面的工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信