Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of non-myeloid subsequent malignant neoplasms after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

June-Wha Rhee, Sitong Chen, Raju Pillai, Alysia Bosworth, Artem Oganesyan, Emma Grigorian, Liezl Atencio, Caitlyn Estrada, Mareen Kassabian, Lanie Lindenfeld, Rusha Bhandari, Scott Goldsmith, Michael Rosenzweig, Alex F Herrera, Matthew G Mei, Ryotaro Nakamura, F Lennie Wong, Stephen J Forman, Saro H Armenian
{"title":"Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of non-myeloid subsequent malignant neoplasms after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation","authors":"June-Wha Rhee, Sitong Chen, Raju Pillai, Alysia Bosworth, Artem Oganesyan, Emma Grigorian, Liezl Atencio, Caitlyn Estrada, Mareen Kassabian, Lanie Lindenfeld, Rusha Bhandari, Scott Goldsmith, Michael Rosenzweig, Alex F Herrera, Matthew G Mei, Ryotaro Nakamura, F Lennie Wong, Stephen J Forman, Saro H Armenian","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Examine the association between clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and non-myeloid subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,931 consecutive patients who underwent HCT between 2010 and 2016 at a single center. DNA from pre-HCT mobilized blood products was sequenced to identify CH variants (variant allele frequency [VAF] ≥2%). The primary outcome was 8-year(y) cumulative incidence (CI) of non-myeloid SMNs. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between CH and non-myeloid SMNs, as well as cause-specific mortality. Results Median age at HCT was 58.8 y (range 18.4-78.1y); 389 patients (20.1% of the cohort) had at least one CH variant and 94 (4.9%) had ≥2 variants. The 8 y CI of non-myeloid SMNs was significantly higher in patients with CH compared to those without (15.1% vs 7.2%, p < .001), and increased by VAF: 7.2% (VAF <2%), 14.0% (VAF 2– <10%), 19.4% (VAF ≥10%); p = .001. Patients with CH had a two-fold increased risk of non-myeloid SMNs (standardized incidence ratio = 1.9), compared with the general population. In multivariable analysis, CH was an independent and significant risk factor for non-myeloid SMNs (hazard ratio [HR]=1.72, 95%CI 1.15–2.59). Finally, patients with CH had significantly worse survival, primarily due to the higher risk of non-relapse mortality (HR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.90-4.64). Conclusions CH was significantly associated with risk of non-myeloid SMNs after HCT, and the magnitude of association increased by VAF. CH may serve as a biomarker for identifying HCT survivors at higher risk for developing non-myeloid SMNs.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Examine the association between clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and non-myeloid subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,931 consecutive patients who underwent HCT between 2010 and 2016 at a single center. DNA from pre-HCT mobilized blood products was sequenced to identify CH variants (variant allele frequency [VAF] ≥2%). The primary outcome was 8-year(y) cumulative incidence (CI) of non-myeloid SMNs. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between CH and non-myeloid SMNs, as well as cause-specific mortality. Results Median age at HCT was 58.8 y (range 18.4-78.1y); 389 patients (20.1% of the cohort) had at least one CH variant and 94 (4.9%) had ≥2 variants. The 8 y CI of non-myeloid SMNs was significantly higher in patients with CH compared to those without (15.1% vs 7.2%, p < .001), and increased by VAF: 7.2% (VAF <2%), 14.0% (VAF 2– <10%), 19.4% (VAF ≥10%); p = .001. Patients with CH had a two-fold increased risk of non-myeloid SMNs (standardized incidence ratio = 1.9), compared with the general population. In multivariable analysis, CH was an independent and significant risk factor for non-myeloid SMNs (hazard ratio [HR]=1.72, 95%CI 1.15–2.59). Finally, patients with CH had significantly worse survival, primarily due to the higher risk of non-relapse mortality (HR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.90-4.64). Conclusions CH was significantly associated with risk of non-myeloid SMNs after HCT, and the magnitude of association increased by VAF. CH may serve as a biomarker for identifying HCT survivors at higher risk for developing non-myeloid SMNs.
克隆造血和自体造血细胞移植后非髓系恶性肿瘤的风险
目的探讨自体造血细胞移植(HCT)后克隆造血(CH)与非髓系继发恶性肿瘤(SMNs)的关系。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2010年至2016年在单中心连续接受HCT治疗的1931例患者。对hct前动员血液制品的DNA进行测序,鉴定CH变异(变异等位基因频率[VAF]≥2%)。主要终点是非髓系smn的8年累积发病率(CI)。多变量回归分析用于评估CH与非髓系smn以及病因特异性死亡率之间的关系。结果HCT的中位年龄为58.8岁(18.4-78.1岁);389例患者(占队列的20.1%)至少有一种CH变异,94例患者(4.9%)有≥2种变异。CH患者非髓系smn的8 y CI显著高于无CH患者(15.1% vs 7.2%, p <;措施),并增加了VAF: 7.2% (VAF和lt; 2%), 14.0% (VAF 2 -和lt; 10%), 19.4% (VAF≥10%);P = .001。与一般人群相比,CH患者发生非髓系SMNs的风险增加了两倍(标准化发生率= 1.9)。在多变量分析中,CH是非髓系SMNs的独立且显著的危险因素(危险比[HR]=1.72, 95%CI = 1.15-2.59)。最后,CH患者的生存率明显较差,主要是由于非复发死亡率风险较高(HR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.90-4.64)。结论CH与HCT后非髓系SMNs发生风险显著相关,且VAF增加了相关性。CH可以作为识别HCT幸存者发生非髓系smn风险较高的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信