Local post-procedural cryoprevention significantly reduces the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Shunjiro Azuma,Yosuke Kobayashi,Ryo Harada,Kei Yane,Kenji Sawada,Akiko Tsujimoto,Osamu Inatomi,Tomoaki Matsumori,Kenichi Yoshimura,Shujiro Yazumi,Akira Kurita
{"title":"Local post-procedural cryoprevention significantly reduces the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Shunjiro Azuma,Yosuke Kobayashi,Ryo Harada,Kei Yane,Kenji Sawada,Akiko Tsujimoto,Osamu Inatomi,Tomoaki Matsumori,Kenichi Yoshimura,Shujiro Yazumi,Akira Kurita","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nPost-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a common, potentially serious adverse event of ERCP. While rectal NSAIDs are recommended for prevention, their use in Japan is limited due to dosage concerns. This multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of ice water irrigation to the papilla in reducing PEP.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis single-blind trial enrolled 880 adults with a native papilla undergoing ERCP at eight hospitals in Japan (March 2022-February 2024). After three withdrawals, 877 were analyzed (cryoprevention: 434; control: 443). The primary outcome was PEP incidence, defined as abdominal pain within 24 hours and serum amylase or lipase ≥3 times the upper normal limit. Secondary outcomes included cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, and mortality.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPEP incidence was significantly lower in the cryoprevention group (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.4%) than the control group (6.8%; 95% CI, 4.6%-9.6%) (P = 0.02), with absolute and relative risk reductions of 3.6% and 52.4%. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, including cholangitis (0.9% vs 1.1%; P = 1.00), bleeding (1.4% vs 2.5%; P = 0.33), or perforation (0.9% vs 0.2%; P = 0.21). One control patient died from severe PEP. No adverse events related to cryoprevention were reported.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCryoprevention using ice water significantly reduced PEP incidence, demonstrating a safe, effective, and low-cost strategy. This approach offers a practical alternative, where NSAID use is limited.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a common, potentially serious adverse event of ERCP. While rectal NSAIDs are recommended for prevention, their use in Japan is limited due to dosage concerns. This multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of ice water irrigation to the papilla in reducing PEP. METHODS This single-blind trial enrolled 880 adults with a native papilla undergoing ERCP at eight hospitals in Japan (March 2022-February 2024). After three withdrawals, 877 were analyzed (cryoprevention: 434; control: 443). The primary outcome was PEP incidence, defined as abdominal pain within 24 hours and serum amylase or lipase ≥3 times the upper normal limit. Secondary outcomes included cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, and mortality. RESULTS PEP incidence was significantly lower in the cryoprevention group (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.4%) than the control group (6.8%; 95% CI, 4.6%-9.6%) (P = 0.02), with absolute and relative risk reductions of 3.6% and 52.4%. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, including cholangitis (0.9% vs 1.1%; P = 1.00), bleeding (1.4% vs 2.5%; P = 0.33), or perforation (0.9% vs 0.2%; P = 0.21). One control patient died from severe PEP. No adverse events related to cryoprevention were reported. CONCLUSIONS Cryoprevention using ice water significantly reduced PEP incidence, demonstrating a safe, effective, and low-cost strategy. This approach offers a practical alternative, where NSAID use is limited.
局部手术后低温预防显著降低ercp后胰腺炎的发生率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
目的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胰腺炎(PEP)是ERCP术后常见的潜在严重不良事件。虽然直肠非甾体抗炎药被推荐用于预防,但由于剂量问题,它们在日本的使用受到限制。这项多中心随机对照试验评估了冰水灌洗乳头降低PEP的有效性和安全性。方法:该单盲试验在日本8家医院(2022年3月至2024年2月)招募了880名患有原生乳头的成年人接受ERCP。三次提取后,分析了877例(低温预防:434例;控制:443)。主要终点为PEP发生率,定义为24小时内腹痛,血清淀粉酶或脂肪酶≥正常上限的3倍。次要结局包括胆管炎、出血、穿孔和死亡率。结果低温预防组spep发生率显著低于对照组(3.2%;95% CI, 1.7%-5.4%)高于对照组(6.8%;95% CI, 4.6%-9.6%) (P = 0.02),绝对和相对风险分别降低3.6%和52.4%。次要结局无显著差异,包括胆管炎(0.9% vs 1.1%;P = 1.00),出血(1.4% vs 2.5%;P = 0.33)或穿孔(0.9% vs 0.2%;P = 0.21)。1例对照患者死于严重PEP。无与低温预防相关的不良事件报道。结论冰水预防可显著降低PEP发生率,是一种安全、有效、低成本的预防策略。在非甾体抗炎药使用受限的情况下,这种方法提供了一种实用的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信