Effectiveness of dietary interventions in individuals with diabetes for preventing and healing chronic wounds; a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 3.4
Hailey R Donnelly, Clare E Collins, Erin D Clarke, Prudence I Morrissey, Natalie Gilbertson-Viljevac, Lucy Leigh, Peta E Tehan
{"title":"Effectiveness of dietary interventions in individuals with diabetes for preventing and healing chronic wounds; a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Hailey R Donnelly, Clare E Collins, Erin D Clarke, Prudence I Morrissey, Natalie Gilbertson-Viljevac, Lucy Leigh, Peta E Tehan","doi":"10.1111/dme.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimising the nutritional status of individuals with diabetes is essential to optimise glycaemic control, as well as to prevent and promote wound healing. A variety of nutrition interventions are available. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe and synthesise the effectiveness of nutrition interventions for the prevention and management of chronic wounds in people with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases and four clinical trial registries were searched for nutrition intervention studies. Included studies involved a nutrition intervention, such as personalised medical nutrition therapy, education and/or nutrient supplementation for those with diabetes and a chronic wound. Meta-analysis was completed utilising mean wound size at follow-up and non-adjusted data where available. Quality was appraised using RoB 2 and ROBINS, and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included; all included studies were in diabetes-related foot ulcer populations. Meta-analyses demonstrated nutrient supplements, including single and multi-nutrient supplements, significantly reduced wound depth (MWD -0.200 [95% CI -0.364, -0.035], p = 0.0172), width (WMD -0.466 [95% CI -0.724, -0.208], p = 0.0004) and length (-0.443 [95% CI -0.841, -0.045], p = 0.0292), the quality of included studies was low and the certainty of evidence was very low. While substantial heterogeneity was detected (I<sup>2</sup> = 56%-68%), a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to account for between-study variability, providing an overall estimate while acknowledging differences in study characteristics. Two studies evaluating the effect of nutrition education demonstrated significant wound size reduction (n = 1) and proportion of people healed (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is low-quality evidence that nutrient supplementation improves wound healing. Nutrition education may have a role in enhancing wound size reduction. Further studies are needed using robust methodologies to comprehensively determine the effectiveness of nutrition interventions for wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":520603,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","volume":" ","pages":"e70100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimising the nutritional status of individuals with diabetes is essential to optimise glycaemic control, as well as to prevent and promote wound healing. A variety of nutrition interventions are available. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe and synthesise the effectiveness of nutrition interventions for the prevention and management of chronic wounds in people with diabetes.

Methods: Five databases and four clinical trial registries were searched for nutrition intervention studies. Included studies involved a nutrition intervention, such as personalised medical nutrition therapy, education and/or nutrient supplementation for those with diabetes and a chronic wound. Meta-analysis was completed utilising mean wound size at follow-up and non-adjusted data where available. Quality was appraised using RoB 2 and ROBINS, and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results: Twenty-three studies were included; all included studies were in diabetes-related foot ulcer populations. Meta-analyses demonstrated nutrient supplements, including single and multi-nutrient supplements, significantly reduced wound depth (MWD -0.200 [95% CI -0.364, -0.035], p = 0.0172), width (WMD -0.466 [95% CI -0.724, -0.208], p = 0.0004) and length (-0.443 [95% CI -0.841, -0.045], p = 0.0292), the quality of included studies was low and the certainty of evidence was very low. While substantial heterogeneity was detected (I2 = 56%-68%), a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to account for between-study variability, providing an overall estimate while acknowledging differences in study characteristics. Two studies evaluating the effect of nutrition education demonstrated significant wound size reduction (n = 1) and proportion of people healed (n = 1).

Conclusion: There is low-quality evidence that nutrient supplementation improves wound healing. Nutrition education may have a role in enhancing wound size reduction. Further studies are needed using robust methodologies to comprehensively determine the effectiveness of nutrition interventions for wound healing.

糖尿病患者饮食干预对慢性伤口预防和愈合的有效性荟萃分析的系统综述。
背景:优化糖尿病患者的营养状况对于优化血糖控制,以及预防和促进伤口愈合至关重要。有多种营养干预措施可供选择。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在描述和综合营养干预对糖尿病患者慢性伤口的预防和管理的有效性。方法:检索5个数据库和4个临床试验注册中心的营养干预研究。纳入的研究涉及营养干预,例如针对糖尿病和慢性伤口患者的个性化医疗营养治疗、教育和/或营养补充。利用随访时的平均伤口大小和可用的非调整数据完成meta分析。采用rob2和ROBINS评价质量,采用GRADE评价证据的确定性。结果:纳入23项研究;所有纳入的研究都是在糖尿病相关的足溃疡人群中进行的。meta分析显示,营养补充剂,包括单一和多种营养补充剂,可显著减少伤口深度(MWD -0.200 [95% CI -0.364, -0.035], p = 0.0172)、宽度(WMD -0.466 [95% CI -0.724, -0.208], p = 0.0004)和长度(-0.443 [95% CI -0.841, -0.045], p = 0.0292),纳入的研究质量较低,证据的确定性很低。虽然检测到大量异质性(I2 = 56%-68%),但进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以解释研究之间的变异性,在承认研究特征差异的同时提供总体估计。两项评估营养教育效果的研究显示,伤口大小显著减少(n = 1),治愈人数显著增加(n = 1)。结论:营养补充促进创面愈合的证据质量不高。营养教育可能有促进伤口缩小的作用。需要使用可靠的方法进行进一步的研究,以全面确定营养干预对伤口愈合的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信