Conducting MRI trials in Alzheimer's patients: Challenges and Guidelines.

Maria Dobrushina, Sayyeda Chandni, Linda Dietrich, Wenzel Glanz, Michaela Butryn, Dorothea Hämmerer, Lucía Penalba-Sánchez
{"title":"Conducting MRI trials in Alzheimer's patients: Challenges and Guidelines.","authors":"Maria Dobrushina, Sayyeda Chandni, Linda Dietrich, Wenzel Glanz, Michaela Butryn, Dorothea Hämmerer, Lucía Penalba-Sánchez","doi":"10.1101/2025.07.02.25330723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combining pharmaceutical interventions with neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research presents logistical and methodological challenges. This perspective paper outlines early-phase experiences from a 7-tesla (7T) fMRI clinical trial involving individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild AD, highlighting recruitment hurdles and practical recommendations. From a pool of 1,000 patients, 475 had MCI or AD clinically diagnosed; following pre-selection and screening, only 6% met all inclusion criteria. Major barriers included exclusion due to comorbidities, difficulties with blood draws, miscommunication about study procedures, and unreported medical conditions discovered during MRI. Effective communication, often requiring caregiver involvement, was essential for obtaining accurate medical histories and improving adherence. Internally, clear team coordination helped manage scheduling and protocol compliance. While strict eligibility criteria enhance data quality, they significantly impede recruitment and feasibility in high-field MRI drug studies. We offer recommendations to optimize recruitment and screening, improve protocol execution, and better balance scientific rigor with real-world clinical constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.02.25330723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combining pharmaceutical interventions with neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research presents logistical and methodological challenges. This perspective paper outlines early-phase experiences from a 7-tesla (7T) fMRI clinical trial involving individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild AD, highlighting recruitment hurdles and practical recommendations. From a pool of 1,000 patients, 475 had MCI or AD clinically diagnosed; following pre-selection and screening, only 6% met all inclusion criteria. Major barriers included exclusion due to comorbidities, difficulties with blood draws, miscommunication about study procedures, and unreported medical conditions discovered during MRI. Effective communication, often requiring caregiver involvement, was essential for obtaining accurate medical histories and improving adherence. Internally, clear team coordination helped manage scheduling and protocol compliance. While strict eligibility criteria enhance data quality, they significantly impede recruitment and feasibility in high-field MRI drug studies. We offer recommendations to optimize recruitment and screening, improve protocol execution, and better balance scientific rigor with real-world clinical constraints.

在阿尔茨海默病患者中进行MRI试验:挑战和指南。
在阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究中结合药物干预和神经影像学提出了后勤和方法上的挑战。本文概述了一项涉及轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度AD患者的7特斯拉(7T) fMRI临床试验的早期经验,强调了招募障碍和实用建议。在1000名患者中,475名临床诊断为轻度认知障碍或AD;经过预选和筛选,只有6%符合所有纳入标准。主要障碍包括因合并症、抽血困难、对研究程序的误解以及MRI发现的未报告的医疗状况而被排除。有效的沟通通常需要护理人员的参与,这对于获得准确的病史和提高依从性至关重要。在内部,清晰的团队协作有助于管理日程安排和协议遵从性。虽然严格的资格标准提高了数据质量,但它们严重阻碍了高场MRI药物研究的招募和可行性。我们提供建议,以优化招募和筛选,改善方案执行,更好地平衡科学严谨性与现实世界的临床约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信