Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy, Diana Carolina Delgado-Díaz, Kelli E. DuBois, Halide Zeynep Aydin, Courtney M. Monroe, Yesil Kim, James Hardin, Sara Wilcox, Homayoun Valafar
{"title":"The mLIFE randomized trial examining the impact of gamifying social support provision for weight loss","authors":"Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy, Diana Carolina Delgado-Díaz, Kelli E. DuBois, Halide Zeynep Aydin, Courtney M. Monroe, Yesil Kim, James Hardin, Sara Wilcox, Homayoun Valafar","doi":"10.1002/oby.24330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The Mobile Lifestyle Intervention for Food and Exercise (mLIFE) study was a 12-month mobile weight loss intervention examining social gaming to promote social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults with overweight or obesity (<i>n</i> = 243) were randomized to the mLIFE + points (received points for social support activities) or mLIFE group (blinded to points). Weight was measured via Fitbit scales. Repeated-measures mixed models were used to conduct both an intent-to-treat analysis and an analysis among adherent participants (logged on to the mLIFE app ≥25% of study days).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Attrition was lower in the mLIFE + points group (22% vs. 41% in mLIFE; χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.8, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and adherence was higher (61% vs. 42% in mLIFE; χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.6, <i>p</i> < 0.01). None of the group × time interactions was significant for the intent-to-treat analysis except for total number of points earned at 12 months (mLIFE + points mean 605.9 [SE 203.2] vs. mLIFE mean 350.0 [SE 200.0]; <i>p</i> < 0.01). The mLIFE + points participants lost a mean of 5.3 [SE 0.6] kg at 12 months (vs. mean 3.5 [SE 0.7] kg in mLIFE; <i>p</i> = 0.09). Among adherent participants (<i>n</i> = 127), mLIFE + points participants lost more weight (mean 7.3 [SE 0.8] kg) than mLIFE (mean 3.8 [SE 0.9] kg; <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of points led to greater weight loss at 12 months, but only among adherent participants. Providing points for completing social support activities is a way to retain participants and increase engagement in a mobile intervention.</p>\n \n <div>\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 8","pages":"1447-1456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24330","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The Mobile Lifestyle Intervention for Food and Exercise (mLIFE) study was a 12-month mobile weight loss intervention examining social gaming to promote social support.
Methods
Adults with overweight or obesity (n = 243) were randomized to the mLIFE + points (received points for social support activities) or mLIFE group (blinded to points). Weight was measured via Fitbit scales. Repeated-measures mixed models were used to conduct both an intent-to-treat analysis and an analysis among adherent participants (logged on to the mLIFE app ≥25% of study days).
Results
Attrition was lower in the mLIFE + points group (22% vs. 41% in mLIFE; χ2 = 9.8, p < 0.01), and adherence was higher (61% vs. 42% in mLIFE; χ2 = 7.6, p < 0.01). None of the group × time interactions was significant for the intent-to-treat analysis except for total number of points earned at 12 months (mLIFE + points mean 605.9 [SE 203.2] vs. mLIFE mean 350.0 [SE 200.0]; p < 0.01). The mLIFE + points participants lost a mean of 5.3 [SE 0.6] kg at 12 months (vs. mean 3.5 [SE 0.7] kg in mLIFE; p = 0.09). Among adherent participants (n = 127), mLIFE + points participants lost more weight (mean 7.3 [SE 0.8] kg) than mLIFE (mean 3.8 [SE 0.9] kg; p < 0.01).
Conclusions
The use of points led to greater weight loss at 12 months, but only among adherent participants. Providing points for completing social support activities is a way to retain participants and increase engagement in a mobile intervention.
期刊介绍:
Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.