Evaluation of two structural sealing methods for sulfuryl fluoride fumigation against bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).

Morgan M Wilson, Alicia Arneson, Dini M Miller
{"title":"Evaluation of two structural sealing methods for sulfuryl fluoride fumigation against bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).","authors":"Morgan M Wilson, Alicia Arneson, Dini M Miller","doi":"10.1093/jee/toaf096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bed bug, Cimex lectularius (L.) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), has become a well-established pest in houses within the United States. This is partly because bed bugs have been so successful at invading the many void spaces that exist in homes. Fumigation with sulfuryl fluoride (Vikane) at the 1.9× dosage rate is one of the few control methods that can access all bed bug harborage spaces in these homes and potentially eliminate all insecticide-resistant bed bug life stages in a single treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the labor costs and efficacy of two different home sealing methods that are typically used when conducting structural fumigation: covering the home with a tarpaulin or sealing cracks of doors and windows with tape (\"tape-and-seal\" method). It was found that the tarpaulin fumigations required a significantly greater number of labor hours (42.6 ± 2.3 SEM) than the tape-and-seal fumigations (24.2 ± 5.0 SEM) due to the more detailed preparation requirements (requiring more laborers) and longer fumigant holding periods. Only the tarp fumigations achieved 100% mortality of sentinel bed bug eggs. In the tape-and-seal fumigations, hatching was observed for 22% of the eggs, with 10% of the hatched nymphs surviving. This lack of complete bed bug mortality was because two tape-and-seal fumigations were unable to reach the 1.9× dosage rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bed bug, Cimex lectularius (L.) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), has become a well-established pest in houses within the United States. This is partly because bed bugs have been so successful at invading the many void spaces that exist in homes. Fumigation with sulfuryl fluoride (Vikane) at the 1.9× dosage rate is one of the few control methods that can access all bed bug harborage spaces in these homes and potentially eliminate all insecticide-resistant bed bug life stages in a single treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the labor costs and efficacy of two different home sealing methods that are typically used when conducting structural fumigation: covering the home with a tarpaulin or sealing cracks of doors and windows with tape ("tape-and-seal" method). It was found that the tarpaulin fumigations required a significantly greater number of labor hours (42.6 ± 2.3 SEM) than the tape-and-seal fumigations (24.2 ± 5.0 SEM) due to the more detailed preparation requirements (requiring more laborers) and longer fumigant holding periods. Only the tarp fumigations achieved 100% mortality of sentinel bed bug eggs. In the tape-and-seal fumigations, hatching was observed for 22% of the eggs, with 10% of the hatched nymphs surviving. This lack of complete bed bug mortality was because two tape-and-seal fumigations were unable to reach the 1.9× dosage rate.

硫酰氟熏蒸灭臭虫两种结构密封方法的评价(半翅目:杀螨科)。
臭虫,臭虫(半翅目:臭虫科),在美国已经成为一种公认的害虫。这在一定程度上是因为臭虫非常成功地侵入了家庭中存在的许多空隙。以1.9倍剂量率的硫酰氟(维坎)熏蒸是为数不多的几种控制方法之一,可以进入这些家庭的所有臭虫避难所,并有可能在一次处理中消灭所有耐杀虫剂的臭虫生命阶段。本研究的目的是评估进行结构性熏蒸时通常使用的两种不同的家庭密封方法的人工成本和效果:用防水油布覆盖房屋或用胶带密封门窗裂缝(“胶带密封”方法)。研究发现,由于篷布熏蒸的准备要求更详细(需要更多的工人)和熏蒸时间更长,篷布熏蒸所需的劳动时间(42.6±2.3 SEM)明显高于胶带和密封熏蒸(24.2±5.0 SEM)。只有油布熏蒸法对哨床臭虫卵的死亡率达到100%。在胶带和密封熏蒸中,22%的卵孵化,10%的孵化若虫存活。这种缺乏完全的臭虫死亡率是因为两次胶带和密封熏蒸无法达到1.9倍的剂量率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信